1./ Is the Beeb careless about paedophilia? One reason it might be is its closeness to madcap LGBTQ+ activists who seem themselves to be blasé about child safeguarding. How else to explain why the BBC is still showcasing this film presented by a notorious paedophile, Ian Dunn.👇
2./ 'Glad to Be Gay' is one of the films in the BBC's Gay Archive. And who is Dunn? He was exposed in the 1980s as one of the founders of the Paedophile Information Exchange. Yet here's the BBC Pride staff group last week suggesting people check out the films. No questions asked.
3./ Dunn was a disgusting individual who campaigned to sweep away the age of consent and is alleged to have had lots of under age sex himself. It's not as if the BBC wasn't warned. Here's the Daily Mail complaining about the film in...2015. 👇 dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3…
4./ There's an argument for allowing access to the film as a historical item. But it's a total ethical failure not to highlight the TRUTH about Dunn. Here's what happened to the National Museum when they presented Dunn as some sort of gay rights hero.👇scotsman.com/arts-and-cultu…
5./ Even the Greens' Patrick Harvie had to apologise for taking an award in Dunn's name tho I'm not sure he ever handed it back. IF the BBC took advice from mainstream LGB staff I'd guarantee they'd urge the Beeb to highlight Dunn's appalling mixed record and terrible legacy.👇
6./ Instead the BBC relies on its LGBTQ+ Queer Theory influenced activists who seem to share the tin ear of the likes of Peter Tatchell on the horror felt by the public at paedophilia. Here's Tatchell's uplifting obituary to Dunn, the notorious paedo. 👇 independent.co.uk/news/obituarie…
7./ The BBC has been advised by Stonewall and other weird organisations for years. You have to wonder why in all that time the BBC has not removed a paedophile from its showcase history of gay rights. Maybe they don't care about gay people's reputation? 👇bbc.co.uk/archive/the-ga…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ Words fail me. This disturbed person says “he” is now a gay man. Born female “he” asked surgeons to create a suppurating roll of flesh “he” calls a penis harvested from “his” thigh. An op with a 50% fail rate with as many as 12 corrective follow ups.👇 nymag.com/intelligencer/…
2./ In “his” pre transition life as a journalist “he” wrote about organising their own violent abuse in order to “deal with PTSD” they claimed to be linked to a Haitian woman’s rape. That woman complained bitterly about her story being misused. 👇 amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/24…
3./ It was a disgusting article that left many wondering if there wasn’t something wrong with the journalist. A “queer” therapist claimed to have recommended the journalist’s own abuse at the hands of a male friend; not as some freaky S&M fantasy but as healing ritual. 🤦♂️
1./ The BLOB. This by Paul Dacre on @Ofcom is brilliant. But he doesn't mention the Nolan Investigates revelation that the regulator lied to the @BBC (our national broadcaster) about its engagement with @ALLIANCELGB; a gay charity its leader defamed. 👇spectator.co.uk/article/if-i-w…
2./ Questioned by a buffoon masquerading as a politician @dawes_melanie seemed to suggest she took instruction from @stonewalluk on appropriate editorial decisions. @Ofcom then did what any incompetent TV producer might do when caught out: they lied.👇bbc.co.uk/programmes/p09…
3./ But of course the thing about the Blobbites is they have no backbone. And it wasn't too long before @Ofcom who'd denied any influence AT ALL by @stonewalluk then unceremoniously dumped them in order to avoid the impression of err...influence.🤷♀️👇ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/la…
1./ What’s “normal”? If you believe Lorna Slater, Scotland’s very own low rent Greta Thurnberg it’s gender self identification where males get to hang out in girls changing rooms and lesbians get told objecting to lady penis is transphobic. 👇
2./ Lorna fails to mention the first country to let any guy say he’s a woman (no questions asked) was a corrupt basket-case. Argentina’s government introduced a Self-ID policy to distract attention from multiple scandals and its ruination of the economy. Sound familiar?👇
3./ This breakthrough was then used by the lobby group @ILGAWORLD (who were excluded by the UN for over a decade because of their relationship with a paedophile outfit) to argue there was no safeguarding risk despite Argentina conducting no research. Very Normal. 👇
1./ More crap conversion therapy "science". If you imagined the govt's proposed conversion therapy ban is based on authoritative evidence, you'd be wrong. You can tell because the team behind it are now churning out self-justifying rubbish like this. 👇theconversation.com/does-the-gover…
2./ In his essay Adam Jowett gives the impression he surveyed so MANY people who were incredibly representative; peppering it with comments like "several people felt" or "most told us". Never does he admit the grand TOTAL of people he spoke to in his research was...30. Yep 30!👇
3./ I've said before you might be able to make useful comments about the experiences of just 30 people. But here's the same Adam Jowett retweeting someone slamming a recent BBC article and dismissing the experience of 80 lesbians as "marginal". Is 30 less marginal than 80?👇
1./ Self-ID and Liars. Those who support Gender Self-ID (the right of any male to say he's a woman and be believed, no questions asked) ridicule the notion anyone would exploit this with malign intent. So how to explain this incredible story from Canada.👇 cbc.ca/newsinteractiv…
2./ The Union that failed to represent @Docstockk embraced not just gender self-ID but racial Self-ID, and so has Canada. So when Carrie Bourassa claimed to be "indigenous" she HAD to be believed. Here she is getting all emotional in a Ted Talk. 👇 cbc.ca/player/play/19…
3./ Bourassa was a big fake. Her ethnic origins were actually Czech yet she rose effortlessly on a wave of affirmation to become one of Canada's leading indigenous figures wielding huge influence and budgets. Could you have told she was lying in this interview with students? 👇
1./ It's great to see @RichardDawkins sign the Declaration on Women's Sex Based Rights. Having worked with him on a show about Evolution I can testify to his unbending rigour about facts. There's no chance denying biological sex's importance would pass muster with the Prof. 👇
2./ As @blablafishcakes has pointed out it was attempts by trans activists to convince Dawkins that seem to have backfired. In a choice between the rational argument of @Docstockk and an irrational cacophony -or Katyophony- Dawkins championed Reason, one more time. 👇
3./ Dawkins has made it clear where he stands for some time. Here he applauds a brilliant article by @TrevorPTweets that denounced workplace attempts to force employees to agree 'transwomen are women'. He called this 'oppressive nonsense', which it is. 👇