🧵 on the physiology of regional strain. While the added value of global longitudinal strain is doubtful, compared to MAPSE, strain and strain rate was, and is still a method for visualising inequalities of *Regional* systolic shortening.
1/ B-mode provides all the necessary information where changes are large and obvious, as in this case, but regional strain/strain rate may be of added value in giving some added physiological information
2/ in other cases, where changes are small, strain and strain rate may add diagnostic value.
3/ However, regional strain and strain rate are vulnerable to all kinds of noise and other distortions, as well as method and vendor dependent. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528162/
4/ But the physiological mechanisms are independent of vendor and method. Qualitative evaluation of curve shape or colour M-mode are thus far more robust, while containing most of the pathophysiological information. This is Strain and strain rate from the septum of pat. in 2/
5/ the curve shapes of strain rate and strain gives the same information, but strain may be more intuitive. Colour M-mode is another semi-quantitative approach, giving much of the same information, useful for evaluating timing as well as extent of pathology.
6/ Even with different technology, speckle tracking and Tissue Doppler gives roughly the same information, relating to the same physiology, as in this example from the case in tweet 1/
7/ To understand the physiology of altered regional function, it is necessary to look at shortening versus load. In a symmetric ventricle the load can be described by intracavitary pressure, P, wall thickness, h, and the radius of regional curvature, r by the law of Laplace.
8/ Looking at the experimental model of isolated papillary muscle, it explains this well. As the muscle develops tension (force), the contraction is isometric, until tension = load, where the muscle starts to shorten, in an isotonic contraction.
Of course, this model is simplified, relating to the whole heart, but is still useful in explaining the physiology.
9/ The papillary muscle model illustrates the dependence of strain and strain rate on load, in the case of unchanged contractility. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13978233/
10/ Contractility changes also affect strain and strain rate, also with constant load. Contractility change also affects relaxation rate. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14220048/
In the case of ischemia, the prolongation of relaxation is even more pronounced, as SERCA is energy dependent
In general, the wall stress is fairly equally distributed over the ventricle, curvature being greatest in the apex, but the apical wall is also thinnest. P, of course is the same for all parts of the ventricle. Thus all segments shows approximately the same shortening.
11/As long as contractility is normal in all segments, this will be the pattern. However, looking at the longitudinal tension, it is also part of the load of the neighbouring segment. If both segments (red and blue) have normal contractility, the tension balances.
12/ A segment with reduced contractility (blue), will produce less tension. Thus:
1: Shortening of the segment is reduced
2: Shortening of neighbouring segment is increased due to less load.
3: Delayed relaxation in the segment, thus shortening when the normal segment relaxes
Which looks like something you've seen before
13/ With less tension, there is less shortening, until tension is too low to shorten the segment, but instead it will stretch. But with some tension and delayed relaxation, there will still be PSS
-as also seen before.
14/ Basically, in regional dysfunction (or asynchrony), the tension of a segment is part of the load of the other segments, and the strain pattern depends on the tension-load-shortening relationship. Looking at the systole:
15/ In ischemia, global tension is reduced, giving globally reduced annular motion. But load induced regional hyperkinesia in non ischemic segments, gives reduction of annular in all walls. Annular motion cannot locate iskemia.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14534065/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32600336/
16/ - and when infarcted segments recover, the hyperkinesia of healthy segments reverses as well, although, we didn't quite understand the mechanism of the hyperkinesia at that time. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15891749/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🇳🇴🇩🇰Asbjørn Støylen 🇺🇦🇵🇸

🇳🇴🇩🇰Asbjørn Støylen 🇺🇦🇵🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @strain_rate

Jun 18
🧵On the Wiggers diagram. It is an illustration of temporal relations of atrial, ventricular and aortic pressures with ventricular volumes, in a simplified, schematic illustration of the main relations, for basic teaching purposes, but is not the full truth about physiology. Image
The full picture is far more complex, the typical version of the Wiggers diagram as shown here, do not show the effects of inertia of blood, the knowledge from newer physiological studies with high-fidelity catheters, nor from Doppler and TDI. Let’s look at what’s missing.
#1 The atrioventricular pressure curves cross over in the middle of atrial systole, reversing the gradient from positive to negative, as documented by
Carmeliet;
Appleton: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2208210/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9362417/
Image
Read 15 tweets
Jun 6
🧵on ventricular ejection. Does blood always flow downwards a pressure gradient? Certainly not. A pressure gradient accelerates stagnant blood to flow down the gradient, but blood in motion may flow against the pressure gradient (by inertia), being decelerated. Image
2/ It was shown in the early 60ies that the pressure gradient from LV to Aorta was positive only during early ejection, and then negative during most of ejection. Pressure crossover occurred earlier than peak pressure. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13915694/
Image
3/ The negative gradient after pressure crossover would then decelerate LV outflow, so peak flow must be at pressure crossover. As flow = rate of LV volume decrease, peak rate of volume decrease mus also be: - later that AVO (due to the acceleration) - before peak pressure Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 18
Old misconceptions become as new. A 🧵 A recent paper focusses on pre ejection velocities as a contractility measure. In addition, the authors maintain that these velocities are isovolumic contraction, which they also maintain, is load independent. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37816446/
All three concepts are wrong. True, the peak contraction velocity (peak rate of force development) occurs before AVO, and thus is afterload independent. But it's not preload independent and thus not a true contractility measure. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13915199/
Image
2/ Peak RFD corresponds to peak dP/dt, which is during IVC,m but closest to the AVO. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5561416/
Image
Read 13 tweets
Apr 14
🧵 on atrial systole. 1/ Already in 2001, did we show that both the early and late filling phase was sequential deformation propagating from the base to the apex. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11287889/
Image
2/ This means, both phases consist of a wall elongation wave, generating an AV-plane motion away from the apex. So what are the differences? Image
3/ Only e’ correlates with MAPSE, so the elastic recoil is finished in early systole, while a’ do not, so atrial systole is a new event, caused by the next atrial contraction. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37395325/
Read 12 tweets
Apr 10
🧵1/ Sorry, I accidentally deleted the first tweet in this thread, here is a new and slightly improved version. Looking at the physiology of AVC propagation velocity, there are confounders galore, so taking it as a marker of fibrosis, is premature, to put it mildly.
2/ Firstly, The AVC is an event of onset of IVR, i.e at a part of heart cycle with relatively high cavitary and myocardial pressure. This may contribute to wall stiffness, which again may affect (probably increase) wave propagation velocity. Image
3/ Secondly, This may affect AS patients; who may have a higher wall/cavity pressure at end systole than controls, and thus higher pressure related stiffness.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 10
🧵1/ Looking at the physiology of AVC propagation velocity, there are confounders galore, so taking it as a marker of fibrosis, is premature, to put it mildly.
2/ Firstly, The AVC is an event of onset of IVR, i.e at a part of heart cycle with relatively high cavitary and myocardial pressure. This may contribute to wall stiffness, which again may affect wave prpagation velocity.
3/ Secondly, AS patients may have a higher wall/cavity pressure at end systole than controls, and thus higher pressure related stiffness.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(