Bar charts like these with percentages and fixed overall lengths are usually read as 100% bar charts - each coloured slab is a proportion of the whole.
But in UCU's the percentages don't add up, because each one is a percentage of something else.
Its misdirection
It is a self selected survey (likely to attract people concerned about sexual violence and more likely to have been victims).
66% of respondents were women, 32% men, 2% trans/NB
And out of those who said they had experienced sexual violence 80% women, 16% men, 4% trans/NB
UCU has about 120,000 members & just under 4,000 filled in the survey.
UCU's headline about "risk" is nonsensical. Its a self selected survey - it can't tell you about the people who didn't fill it in.
I don't know what the P values at the bottom are supposed to mean 🤨
14 individuals identifying as trans/NB said they had experienced sexual violence
UCU's No. 1 recommendation is about terminology "gender based violence"
Nothing about the fact that women are the predominant victims
Nothing about the predominant sex of the perpetrators at all
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Did you not even read what the GRA requires? There is no panel judging if you are "feminine or masculine enough" - this is complete fantasy. Pure propaganda
I hope @Emmabarnett challenges her on comparing women who won't pretend that they can't see sex to anti-semites, and lesbians to racists if they rule out dating any men.
Also how she thinks their guidance to allow males to self ID into "female" spaces (changing rooms, toilets, showers at work, uni etc..) accommodates Muslim, Sikh, Jewish women ...
Emma: why do you want to do the job.
Nancy: I am a lesbian. I am married. I adopted children. My life has been transformed.
So to repay Stonewall for its work for LGBTQ people