Notice specifically what Thompson says. First, he says if a criminal referral would be warranted, there would be no reluctance on the part of the committee to do that.
Earlier, @emptywheel quoted from the letter the committee sent to Jim Jordan (Screenshot #1)
See how the language echoes the language of 18. U.S. 1505? (Screenshot #2)
2/
One of the things that goes wrong on social media is confusing speculation (this must be happening because) or (we know it isn't happening because) versus following what is reported as facts.
Yes, we all know that Trump delayed and tried to obstruct the proceedings. . .
3/
But what the committee is telling us is that they have evidence. Notice footnote #3. Documentary evidence.
For reasons I've talked about in some of my videos (transcript on my blog) it's hard to get the boss who insulates himself. But the committee is after hard evidence.
7/
Some insurrectionists already charged have been charged with 1505.
It's not the dramatic crime people might be hoping for, but my guess from what Thompson and Cheney are saying is they have the evidence for that one. They're not going to tease or raise false expectations.
8/
Somewhere on the select committee website (or in one of the docs, I'd have to look for it) the committee says they are coordinating and sharing information with other investigatory agencies to avoid duplication of efforts.
Also it seemed to me from the brief that the DOJ lawyers filed on behalf of the National Archives in Trump's executive privilege case that they knew what evidence has been cataloged.
There is a Twitter consensus that the purpose of all these lawsuits (like the one Flynn filed seeking an injunction against the select committee) is to "run out the clock."
This makes no sense because the clock runs until at least 2024 and the cases are moving quickly.
1/
The work of the committee will be done in 2022 but the select committee is a truth-finding panel. The prosecutors have until at least 2024.
People similarly said that the election fraud lawsuits were to “run out the clock.”
Those cases also went fast.
2/
The election fraud cases were to feed the right-wing propaganda network.
Trump and pals also lost 60 of the 61 election fraud lawsuits (and the "win" was a minor one that didn't help much.)
3/
Looks like Trump is suing Letitia James because he doesn't want to give a deposition under oath.
I'm reading it now.
Oh goodness. This will not break his losing streak. He needs a preliminary injunction and that isn't going to happen. documentcloud.org/documents/2116…
1/
To paraphrase his argument: Letitia James is a Democrat and she doesn't like me so her investigation is politically motivated and therefore unfair and the court needs to make her stop.
I wish I was exaggerating.
Oy.
2/
And what law is she violating?
Count 1: Trump alleges that she is violating his civil rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42…
Alleging a 14th Amendment violation takes some real chutzpa.
3/
Basically, the text says that the Electoral Count Act was unconstitutional, so it should be disregarded.
Among the problems is this: You can't change the rules by which the election results are tabulated after the counting of the votes. You can't change the rules after the game.
"I know I have cookie crumbs on my face, but I swear I wasn't the one who took the cookie."
(Although my expectations for these guys are so low I'm actually glad he isn't already digging in and saying there was nothing wrong with the text.)