🧵

Some people seem to think Omicron is a good thing — a mild variant that can bring this pandemic to an end. I disagree. Omicron is bad news.

1/8
First of all, many more people will die than would not have if Omicron didn’t appear. It will burn through existing immunity and infect huge numbers of people worldwide. Even at a 5x lower death rate, because of many more people getting it, it will cause many extra deaths.

2/8
Second, there is no guarantee Omicron can even rid us of Delta, let alone end the pandemic. On the contrary, its arrival is bad news: that a variant can arise that can escape existing immunity greatly diminishes the hope that vaccines/immunity can eventually eradicate SARS2.

3/8
Before Omicron I thought existing immunity in a high enough % of people in most places will eventually cause Delta or its successors to peter out, as I was cautiously optimistic that variants with SUCH an ability to evade immunity could not arise from human circulation.

4/8
But now we see Omicron arise and reinfect everyone, which means so could the next variant and there is no end in sight. Also, there is no guarantee the next immunoevading variant won’t be deadlier than Omicron or even Delta.

5/8
So our only hope now is that Omicron first eradicates Delta and then burns through the world fast enough to give enough people immunity against itself, and does so before the next immunoevading variant arises.

6/8
That’s the hope, but there are at least two unknowns: how durable Omicron’s immunity is against its own reinfection (hopefully durable enough), and what’s the chance that the next variant arises that will escape ALL prior immunity (hopefully low).

7/8
Oh, and yet another unknown is the potential persistence of SARS2 in people who recover. More and more data emerge that SARS2 can remain active for months in people who show no symptoms. I really hope such dormant infections won’t re-emerge years later like shingles or FIP.

8/8
So Merry Christmas everyone! 😂

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yuri Deigin

Yuri Deigin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ydeigin

23 Dec
Ok, this preprint is scary is as HELL.

"We show SARS-CoV-2 disseminates across the human body and brain early in infection at high levels, and provide evidence of virus replication at multiple extrapulmonary sites during the first week [of] symptom[s]."

researchsquare.com/article/rs-113…
"Others have previously reported SARS-CoV-2 RNA within the heart, lymph node, small intestine, and adrenal gland. We demonstrate conclusively that SARS-CoV-2 is capable of infecting and replicating within these tissues."
"≥50% of late cases also had persistence in the myocardium, thoracic cavity lymph nodes, tongue, peripheral nerves, ocular tissue, and in all sampled areas of the brain, except the dura mater."
Read 4 tweets
13 Dec
I mean seriously, why does it fall to me to educate virologists? 😂 Fact: CoVs *love* to recombine and can pick up all sorts of RNAs during template switching events. CoVs are positive stranded but use a negative template strand for replication. VSV are negative stranded, so
it seems quite possible to me that a CoV RdRp could pick up a negative VSV-SARS2 strand during template switching. Especially given that the VSV-SARS2 spike gene is identical to WT SARS2 save for immunoevading mutations, so
if the template switch happens during spike gene synthesis, the VSV-SARS2 strand will fit right in.
Read 4 tweets
12 Nov
So what do we know on the topic of "Pfizer falsified vaccine trial data"? The only evidence for this comes from @thackerpd piece in @bmj_latest: an action item to discuss "e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc." and a note that one staffer was "verbally counseled for changing data":
The Pfizer trial started screening patients on July 27, 2020 (see attached). So what eDiary data could have been falsified in "early August 2020"? Height/weight/BP? It is not even clear if the staffer counseled for changing data was counseled in connection with the Pfizer trial.
Also, the whistleblower who inspired the BMJ article, Brook Jackson, started her ~2-week stint at Ventavia in September, as the emails she released indicate, i.e. ~1 month after the purported counseling of employee over changed data.
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
🧵 WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN DRASTIC

Ok, we need to set the record straight about how the DRASTIC schism happened. And no, it’s not because of the Radical R, although many of us did want to change it once we realized Billy originally used it for his RAGE University years ago:
Needless to say, most DRASTIC members want nothing to do with such radical anarchist messaging which we never signed up to endorse:
Read 15 tweets
28 Oct
Here's the complete footage of my debate with @stkirsch and his supporters. Yes, it's really 3.5 hours long (sorry). Hey, it's only an hour on 3.5x as @ZDoggMD likes to watch stuff 😂

So, from what I heard, here are the key points of Steve's position:

1) the lone spike in vaccines is toxic and is killing people
[this has, of course, been debunked many times over]

2) it's not just the mRNA vaccines, it's all Covid vaccines that are equally deadly because of (1)

3) VAERS is grossly underreporting potential deaths
4) Almost all *reported* VAERS deaths truly are caused by vaccines and CDC is lying when saying otherwise; and all underreported VAERS deaths are also caused by vaccines (hence Steve's 150K killed Americans number)
Read 6 tweets
2 Oct
Ok, just to show that I am not biased against zoonosis, here is a much more plausible NATURAL way the FCS could have arisen in SARS2 than what virologists could muster so far — via recombination with host mRNA. Namely, pangolin mRNA. In fact, I found a 14-nt match to PRRA insert
in the GIABR pangolin dataset. Yes, that’s the same dataset that contains the SARS2 RBM and was the source for the MP789 pangolin CoV. I was checking it for the PRRA insert and found 3 reads in lung08 run (SRX6893154) that match a 14-nt stretch that fully covers the PRRA insert:
The first read actually mapped to a COMPLEMENT (minus strand) of pangolin mRNA, which is perfect for coronaviral RdRp recombination, as the CoV template strand is a minus strand.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(