Aella Profile picture
26 Dec, 7 tweets, 2 min read
I unapologetically view people who literally believe the stars/planets can predict unrelated things on earth as uniquely bad at thinking (moreso than many other strange beliefs)
But if you don't literally believe this, then astrology seems like it could be really cool. 1/
There's a ton of strange 'power of mind' stuff that probably feels very much like magic, and might need to be approached in a frame of magic for it to work well (similarly how believing in jesus makes spiritual healing work better on you). But it's hard to strike a balance! 2/
As in it can be really hard to let multiple frames overlay your reality at once without picking the mystical one and letting it blend into the predictive one. Mystical experiences can be soul-shatteringly profound, and it's *hard* to not let it interrupt normal truthfinding. 3/
I don't mean to treat mystical experiences as untrue, but rather as a diff type of truth. They are fundamental, they are art, they are the fount of wisdom that can transform who you are, but they *aren't* good evidence for planets predicting the future. 4/
knowingless.com/2019/08/17/you…
When I'm around people where I feel comfortable they know how to keep their frames separate, where understanding of physics remains intact, then I personally feel comfortable talking and interacting in very magical terms that would sound insane to outsiders. 5/
I think of it a bit like a computer; the "true nature" of the computer is incomprehensible ones and zeros in strange boards, but we interact with the "illusion" of the information on the screen. I'm comfortable interacting with illusions, knowing the true nature is 1s and 0s. 6/
and i wouldn't be surprised if we've only begun to tap the weird, cool shit we can do with the illusions on the screen. Experimenting with and investigating this - as long as it's done in harmony with predictive beliefs, not in dismissal of them - sounds really fascinating to me!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aella

Aella Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aella_Girl

24 Dec
I think sex work changed my relationship to my appearance without me noticing: a thread
Pre sex work, I cared very little about my appearance. My mom picked out all my clothes to buy till I was 16 or so; I wore minimal/rare makeup, looking hot wasnt something i thought much of 1/
I started sex work when I was 20; over the years, caring about my appearance became really important for work. I put a *huge* amount of effort into it, cause it was absolutely crucial for my income levels.
This entire time, I viewed the care as "sex work specific"
As in; I figured "being hot" was an overlay onto my natural, not-caring-about-appearance default, and independent of sex work I wouldn't care much anymore. I think this started out true! But nearly a decade in and I think it's fused with me.
Read 5 tweets
23 Dec
a *sigh* woo clarification thread
1. not all woo is created equal; i think some forms of it are still wrong but not very predictive of curiosity/iq
2. i think its possible to approach woo practices with a framework thats compatible with science, i.e. narrative/placebo/ritual work
to elaborate:
just cause a belief is wrong doesn't make it predictive of the person being incurious. If you lived in a hindu culture, "do you believe in hinduism" wouldnt help much differentiating the smart from the dumb people. It depends on how accessible 'right' info is.
This is why I don't believe thinking 9/11 is an inside job is super predictive of curiosity/iq; it's basically plausible (governments doing practical things in secret), and further determination relies on a bunch of confusing details about material sciences or whatever
Read 7 tweets
23 Dec
Ppl who are real into astrology/conspiracies/woo beliefs *really* trigger me, but it's not because of the beliefs themselves, it's what it indicates about the person.
To me, it implies a profound lack of curiosity in checking to see if their beliefs are true. 1/
They're drawn to woo beliefs because it feels good or serves some meaning purpose for them - which I get, I mean I was raised in religion - but there's a total absence of interest in tests to check other theories for why they might be experiencing this thing 2/
I don't get this! How could you not be curious about other theories, when you *know* other people in the world deeply believe stuff that is clearly wrong? It *must* feel convincing to them, so "feeling convincing" to you shouldn't be sufficient criteria. 3/
Read 6 tweets
5 Dec
When you hurt someone you don't like, you lean away from the pain - distance yourself, say they deserve it, you don't feel a bit of what you've caused.
But when you hurt someone you like, you also lean away from the pain - you try to fix it, reassure, apologize, make it stop.
1/
What happens if we don't lean away from the pain? What if we lean *in*? What if it's okay to hurt someone? Of course this does *not* mean distance. To accidentally hurt someone and not lean away is the hardest of all; it means staying with their pain, and yours for causing it 2/
It means you're not trying to fix or brush away. You're here saying "I accept that I hurt you, it's okay that I hurt you", as the pain you caused them shoots back through your bond with them to burn you as well; and you hold that bond, don't flinch, don't let go. 3/
Read 4 tweets
23 Nov
I usually try not to call people idiots, but people have *somehow* managed to interpret this tweet as though I support pedophilia?? Where the hell is the reading comprehension?
And this question (and others like it) is really important, because this *has happened before*. 1/
There actually *is* a tribe where the pedophilia thing is normal: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambia_pe…
And this is great fodder for a billion questions around morality, trauma, how influenced we are by cultural norms, etc. I can't believe people know about this and just shrug it off! 2/
And it's not just that tribe - culture across the world and history has been chock full of behaviors that we today find abhorrent, but at the time were not perceived as harmful. The implications of this... this is like one of the *most* important things to think about. 3/
Read 5 tweets
22 Nov
Eugenics Poll Thread: what do you consider to be eugenics, and do you support it? If possible, please vote for the 'eugenics' part only; if you disagree with other parts of the scenario (like if you object to government funding on principle) please ignore that

POLL 1:
A country provides free screening for down syndrome, counselling that recommends abortion for down syndrome fetuses, and funding for those abortions. This is:
A country offers $5000 to any woman who reproduces, if she scores in the top 10% of a set of (carefully designed, reliable) tests meant to judge general intelligence. This is:
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(