Portrait of Kim Jong Un as a Young Leader
[a lengthy thread]
“Furthermore, Fujimoto stated that "if power is to be handed over then Jong-un is the best for it. He has superb physical gifts, is a big drinker and never admits defeat." Also, according to
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Jong-…
2/"Fujimoto, Jong-un smokes Yves Saint Laurent cigarettes, loves Johnnie Walker whisky and has a Mercedes-Benz 600 luxury sedan. When Jong-un was 18, Fujimoto described an episode where Jong-un once questioned his lavish lifestyle and asked, "we are here, playing basketball,
3/"riding horses, riding jet skis, having fun together. But what of the lives of the average people?”
So at 18 Kim Jong Un is "a big drinker, never admits defeat, smokes Yves Saint Laurent cigarettes, loves Johnnie Walker whisky", basketball, the Chicago Bull & Michael Jordan,
4/Jackie Chan action films, was "well-integrated and ambitious", grades not so hot, liked sports & played video games. If in the US if you were doing all that at 18 you might be a future rock musician or sports player or just a partying trust fund baby. A key to Kim Jong Un's
5/character has been captured by Kenji Fujimoto's recollection when "Jong-un once questioned his lavish lifestyle and asked, "we are here playing basketball, riding horses, riding jet skis, having fun together. But what of the lives of the average people?”
cnn.com/2012/09/19/wor…
6/At 18 Kim Jong Un is a guy who likes to have a good time, loves basketball and knows the mantle of his country's leadership is resting on his shoulders. He has to be incognito among his friends at school in Switzerland but he can't keep it secret. He
world.time.com/2012/01/18/nor…
7/tells a friend in effect, "I'm the son of the leader of North Korea." How would you act if you were the prince of a king or monarch or knew your were "inheriting the throne"? What would go through your mind? How would you handle it? Would you be up to the monumental task?
8/"But what of the lives of the average people?”
That is the moment when you realize you're going to be thrust onto a trajectory far beyond the ordinary, that you'll be entrusted with power, that your loyalty must be with your father & grandfather and that its up to you to find a
9/path to peace w/ the US b/c it's either going to be peace or war w/ the country that destroyed 85% of your country long ago. Luckily you're married to a really hot former cheerleader and pop singer who loves you and will be the mother of your children, whom you love
10/passionately without whom you'd be rudderless.
nytimes.com/2012/07/26/wor…
That Mystery Woman in North Korea? Turns Out She’s the First Lady
"“It would put some of his new policies into the context of a North Korean version of Camelot,” Mr. Park said. “A dynamic and charismatic
11/"first lady could be very helpful in creating this image of Camelot. It’s definitely an uphill battle, but this image could generate some initial momentum.”"
12/You have to keep your country together, show the generals whose in charge, improve the economy under the sanctions, increase agricultural yield and most importantly continue the path of developing nuclear deterrence b/c that is the only way you'll keep the USA on its heels b/c
13/the world has seen what has happened to Libya. You must reward loyalty and punish disloyalty b/c the insidious allure of the West's capitalism always rears its ugly head to interfere with the struggle of achieving the success of DPRK's socialism. You know the last thing you
14/want is war but your hands are tied. Your duty is to maintain strategic national defense that protects your people, your country & your sovereignty so you can't do what the US wants, which is to be like Libya and fully denuke. You can't beg for peace from the US. Obama was a
15/was a liar who didn't fulfill his word and refused to call you by phone, which you asked Dennis Rodman to ask him to do. The US put up a wall of non communication so you had to enact the April 1 2013 Nuclear Law declaring nuclear deterrence as DPRK's national defense.
16/But w/ Trump the miraculous would happen. He'd be the first POTUS with whom you'd make real progress by signing the Singapore Joint Statement and bringing DPRK-US relations to a historic rapprochement. As a family person you want there top be peace on the Korean Peninsula so
17/that your children and their generation will experience the peace you and your generation never did. You and your wife know that the future of DPRK is in the children's hands; it's their future you're working towards, the Promised Land of peace the armistice was signed in
18/to obtain, but which the US has scandalously deserted its duties in, instead continuing to remain "hostile" by demanding the surrender of your national defense. That'll never happen, so God help us all and the world if the US goes crazy and paranoid and wants to attack DPRK.
19/In the 19th century there was only one Korea. And with two Koreas today, Korean culture and history goes back 1000s of years. 20th century ideologies can be as incompatible as oil and vinegar, but as we know, a salad without dressing is tasteless. Beneath ideology is the human
20/being. I see in Kim Jong Un a regular guy who has been catapulted into the position he's in, which he didn't ask for, but which it is his duty to carry out. A nation's hopes rests on his shoulders, and he & Ri Sol Ju want peace, but the US won't give peace. And they cannot
21/surrender their nuclear deterrence. So they're biding their time waiting on the US. Who'll be POTUS in the next Admin? Will it be Trump? Is peace around the corner? Or escalation. They've told the US: "We'll respond power w/ power, good will w/ good will", but the US is
22/notoriously unpredictable and seemingly not intelligent enough to understand their communications. It is a complex situation but they have the right to defend themselves. Why are the US, ROK & the Western powers so against the Kim Dynasty?
23/The Kim Dynasty has been in place since 1948, the year the ROK and DPRK were formed as two sovereign Korean states in ideological opposition. Dynasties, from the Yamato (781 AD - present) to the Ottoman (1299 - 1922 AD) to the Davidic (1010 - 586 BCE) to extant dynasties
24/ruling sovereign monarchies (there “are 43 sovereign states with a monarch as head of state, of which 41 are ruled by dynasties. There are currently 26 sovereign dynasties”), are a part of human civilization. Unlike the election of a civilian as president in democracies, the
25/mantle of leadership, in days past & in the present, in a dynasty are passed down in a hereditary line.

The Korean War was a civil war among the Korean people and an ideological proxy war b/t the USSR & USA. That the fighting ended with the signing of an armistice in 1953 w/
25/the expectation of a peace treaty to settle differences and bring a formal end to the war remains to this day the most significant aspect about an unresolved war b/t South Korea and the DPRK. Two countries fought to gain control of the Korean Peninsula, but no one won, so it
26/stands to reason that both sides relinquish both aspirations and claims of sovereignty over the entire peninsula. Since the then superpowers USA & USSR divided the Korean Peninsula into two Koreas along the 48th parallel (like generals drawing a division line on a map) it
27/isn’t the fault of the Koreas that each naturally would like to lay claim to the entire peninsula. But since this wasn’t resolved by either side winning the war (and thereby taking the “prize” of ownership of the Korean Peninsula), for the two Koreas to make peace they must
28/cease acting as pawns in the game of superpowers and take control of their destinies, whether separately or “hand in hand” in joint collaborative efforts. Kim Jong Un and Moon Jae In have made progress in this direction, aka the Sunshine (or Moonshine) Policy by meeting and
29/signing the Panmunjom & Pyongyang Declarations and Moon delivering a speech in Pyongyang’s May Day Stadium 20 Sept 2018. Yet conservative ROK’s People Power Party has seemingly been perennially against the ROK and DPRK making formal peace, stuck it would seem in the Cold War
30/past which was the cauldron which set off the war. The requirement of today however is to put the past forever behind and follow through on the peace treaty all sides were expecting when the armistice was signed 68 years ago. That means both sides acknowledging the sovereignty
31/ of the other and agreeing to coexist peacefully w/ one another. This is where a variation of the proverbial Judgement of Solomon
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgement…
comes into play. Think of it as the superpowers USA & USSR having already divided the Korean Peninsula in half (the baby).
32/They are symbolic of the woman who, not being the actual mother, was content that Solomon cut the baby in two by the sword. For indeed, the Korean Peninsula has been cut in two by the sword of warfare. Both Korea’s, like brothers then (or sisters), then should be like the true
33/mother who beseeched Solomon to sheath the sword.
“Solomon revealed their true feelings and relationship to the child by suggesting the baby be cut in two, each woman to receive half. With this strategy, he was able to discern the non-mother as the woman who entirely approved
34/of this proposal, while the actual mother begged that the sword might be sheathed and the child committed to the care of her rival.”
How should ROK and the DPRK reconcile? Both sides butt heads when it comes to Korean reunification. Socialism is not in South Korean’s national
35/interest (says Moon), and Kim Il Sung’s concept of Democratic Federal Republic of Koryo relegates socialism to the north (as does DPRK’s constitution itself). Before any real talk of Korean reunification occurs, then, first things first: both Korea’s have to formally
36/acknowledge that since neither won the war, none can lay claim to the entire Korean Peninsula. In order, then, is for both Koreas to formally acknowledge the sovereignty of the other. For the ROK this means abolishing the National Security Law that’s been in effect since 1948,
37/whereas the DPRK should amend its constitution and make a formal statement to the effect that it is content to limit its socialism to DPRK and has no aspirations, plans or goals of ever invading South Korea and forcefully reunifying the Korean Peninsula under socialism by
38/force (which the conservative People Power Party firmly believes is it’s aspiration and intention). The two Koreans making these moves, which could be accomplished in another Moon-Kim summit, would be a huge step forward for all Korean people, a landmark resolution of both
39/leaders walking “hand-in-hand” forward to shape and create Korean people’s destiny together. It would not only draw them together economically but politically and even militarily as well. The US, one of the “divide-and-conquer” superpowers who brought division to the Korean
40/Peninsula, will likely balk at the two Koreas drawing closer together. Yet it needn’t, as this will be a tremendous opportunity for it to bring DPRK into negotiations over permanently limiting its nuclear and ICBM programs in exchange for the US formally accepting a nuclear
41/DPRK and normalizing relations w/ it in a deal where DPRK accepts USFK permanently remaining in the ROK under the Mutual Defense Treaty, the rules of nonproliferation and signs nonaggression pacts w/ the US, ROK & allies. Then, with the threat of nuclear aggression made moot,
42/ROK and DPRK could form a Korean Commonwealth a la the UK, or even a United Korea or United Koryo, a political, economic and military alliance b/t two Korean nations. This would become the anchor of stability in NE Asia. The US and a limited nuclear DPRK start friendly
43/normalized relations for the first time in history as the two Koreas in a United Koryo become an economic juggernaut that integrates its economic policies w/ China’s BRI, and thru Moon’s Nine Bridges plan integrates United Koryo’s interior (thru rails that the former USSR
44/would be envious of) and connects it to Russia & China. United Koryo should become the crossroads of NE Asia that countries around the world will flock to to invest in and do business with.

So here we are today. Biden Admin is seemingly kicking the can of US-DPRK relations do
45/the road to the next POTUS. Kim Jong Un is patiently biding his time, watching the US. Relations are in a "power with power, goodwill with goodwill" mode. If Trump runs there could be another historic summit. Until then keep a low profile and work on agriculture & the economy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael L Bonic

Michael L Bonic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BonicMichael

26 Dec
No First Use DPRK’s textbook nuclear deterrence is purely defensive. John Bolton argues for a preemptive nuclear first strike on North Korea. So the US is the real threat to DPRK.
@Mister_G_2
Proactively countering North Korea’s advancing nuclear threat
atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-resea…
2/I would argue that since the US broke the rules and nuclearized the KP in the first place (when NK was waiting on a ☮️ treaty), what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If US armed ROK w/ nukes DPRK has the right to defend by nuclear deterrence.
3/There’s a reason DPRK calls John Bolton “human scum”. He forced their hand strategically & politically (domestic optics) to put the pedal to the metal on strengthening their nuclear deterrence. In case the US ever does a preemptive nuclear first strike.
Read 33 tweets
26 Dec
2 top fuels
“Natural gas is the best fossil fuel in terms of energy output per unit CO2 emitted. Biomass is renewable b/C a new crop can be grown after each harvest, and biomass is a low carbon fuel.”
why is biomass a better alternative to natural gas apex
lisbdnet.com/why-is-biomass…
2/“How is biomass used as an energy source?
Biomass can be burned to create heat (direct), converted into electricity (direct), or processed into biofuel (indirect). Biomass can be burned by thermal conversion and used for energy. Thermal conversion involves heating the biomass
3/"feedstock in order to burn, dehydrate, or stabilize it.

Is biomass really green?
Biomass is considered renewable because the plant material used to create it can be regrown and the carbon dioxide produced in burning it is re-absorbed by plant life, so it is carbon neutral
Read 9 tweets
26 Dec
This is the 21st century right? 90% of ROK homes use primitive heating??
““ONDOL”- Ancient heating system with modern application. In South Korea over 90% of the houses have radiant floor heating. It is called Ondol, [meaning] warm stone.” korea-heating.eu/_1ondol_eng.php
2/I get primitive Ondol heating in small towns, villages or on a homestead, but South Korea using Ondol heating for 90% of citizens homes is backwards!! Way too much wood 🪵 is burned. ROK should heat homes w/ natural gas. Unreal.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ondol
3/Rethinking it: South Korea has good forest management w/ green goals. Wood fuels & biomass are renewable and forests are carbon sinks and tend towards carbon neutrality. Nevertheless the benefits and utility of natural gas heating shouldn't be ignored.
Read 4 tweets
25 Dec
Real science, real questions
Q21: What is the relationship between temperature and CO2 concentrations during glacial-interglacial cycles?
Q22: What is the difference in CO2 concentrations between maximums in interglacial periods (i.e. peaks in the
sites.gsu.edu/geog1112/lab-6…
2/"graph) and maximums in glacial periods (i.e. valleys in the graph)?
Q23: Why do atmospheric CO2 concentrations increase and decrease so much during glacial-interglacial cycles? 
Q24: Compared to the present-day global average temperature, how much lower was the global
3/"average temperature 21,000 years ago?
Q25: How much did CO2 concentrations increase from 21,000 years ago to 1500 A.D? 
Q26: Why have CO2 concentrations increased by at least another 100 ppm from 1500 A.D. to the present?"
Read 5 tweets
25 Dec
"This...overview of the energy economy in the European Union (EU) in 2019...provides trends for the main energy commodities for primary energy production, imports and exports, gross available energy and final energy consumption."
ec.europa.eu/eurostat/stati… #Eurostat
2/The chart shows the Renewables and biofuel curve is on an upward trajectory, which is what we want. Instead of trying to increase the slope of the curve (i.e. accelerate the increase), just maintaining this slope will get us to the right goal. As renewables & biofuels increase,
3/and market incentives + gov't subsidies make oil & gas less appealing, capitalism will work its magic and consumer trends should shift towards consuming sustainable renewable and biofuel sources of energy. Slow and steady wins the race. Gov't mandates and closing down pipelines
Read 4 tweets
25 Dec
The more you strengthen economic ties among countries w/ different political or ideological systems, the more you decrease chances of a military conflict. Economic cooperation over common denominator resources makes ☮️time desirable and profitable.
People will set ideological differences aside when everyone is able to get in on a slice of the pie. Before the advent of modern ideology, humanity survived the Ice Age and lived in caves following the herds thru the seasons. We can cooperate when it comes to survival.
Long before modern gas pipelines we were engaged in a more primitive way of living:
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(