Beef prices are soaring, but ranchers are going broke. Behind this apparent manifestation of the Great Supply Chain Disruption, a story of monopoly power. Our story from Montana and Missouri with amazing photos by @erinschaff nytimes.com/2021/12/27/bus…
Like so many American stories, this one goes back to Reagan, and the decision to ditch antitrust enforcement as an impediment to efficiency. Four decades later, four largest meatpackers control 85 percent of the beef market.
Ranchers used to capture more than half of every dollar Americans spent on beef; last year they got only 37 cents. The difference flows largely to packers like JBS, a Brazilian conglomerate that used ill gotten state credit to go on international expansion spree.
Thanks to @matthewstoller for excellent work on this subject while making the important point that, behind many surface level explanations in markets, is monopoly power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is how the world ran out of everything. Our story on the global shortages and how business overdid it with Just In Time, enriching shareholders at the expense of the real economy. with @NirajCnytimes.com/2021/06/01/bus…
@NirajC 2/ How lumber, sporting goods, tapioca and chemicals all got scarce at same time is complex, featuring pandemic-related chaos in shipping, production disruption and wildly fluctuating demand. But one key factor cannot be ignored: the corporate world overdid it with staying lean.
@NirajC 3/ A dollar spent stocking warehouses with parts to guard against disruption is a dollar that cannot be distributed to shareholders via dividends and buybacks. This reality is key to understanding what has happened.
Last summer, the Business Roundtable, an association major US CEOs, produced a statement of purpose under which the interest of workers and environment would gain importance alongside shareholders. The pandemic has revealed the hollowness of those words nytimes.com/2020/04/13/bus…
2/ Pundits construed the statement of purpose as a milestone, the end of the slavish devotion to quarterly bottom line. But many major corps used their cash to buy back stock and pay dividends (check it out @TheStalwart ), leaving them with less to aid workers when disaster came
3/ Amazon, worth more than $1 trillion, saw workers walk out, complaining that they lacked protective gear like masks and sanitizer. Macy's paid out a scheduled dividend even as it furloughed most of its workers.
The global recession is shaping up as deeper, longer and more dangerous than initially feared, with recovery likely to take years. My analysis. nytimes.com/2020/04/01/bus…
2/Among investors, conventional wisdom still has it that recovery will be V shaped: We freeze the economy until we contain the pandemic, then we restart everything. Everyone goes back to the mall, planes fill, life snaps back to normal. That vision looks increasingly ridiculous.
3/ The world that emerges from this will be damaged. Businesses fail, hundreds of millions will lose jobs. Fiscal and monetary relief will help, but the scars will be real; productive capacity will be lost; supply chains disrupted. None of that gets put back together quickly.
Could this be a worse economic shock than the global financial crisis? “In many ways it’s far worse than 2008,” said Joseph E. Stiglitz, the Nobel laureate economist. My analysis nytimes.com/2020/03/13/bus…
2/ the point @JosephEStiglitz is making: Last crisis, toolkit was proven. "2008 was a show that we had seen before. We know about financial crises. We knew that it was just money, and that one way or the other the government would step in and save the bankers from their folly.”
@JosephEStiglitz 3/ But this time, the threat is the virus. “This is a shock arising out of the real economy, out of the real world, out of biology, not out of financial shenanigans or complexities,” said @AdamPosen “We are much less well suited to deal with this.”
How did Italy’s communist strongholds come to embrace the extreme right? It started with the China Shock. My story from Tuscany and Marche nytimes.com/2019/12/05/bus… via @nytimes
It is a story with parallels to the China Shock in the American industrial Midwest, which eliminated millions of jobs in the space of a few years, a story that helps explain the embrace of Trump.
And like in the US, the shift toward right wing populism involves nativist sentiments and conceptions of white privilege — the notion that descending into joblessness and poverty is supposed to be a status reserved for other groups
What happens when a predominantly white, Christian country with generous social welfare benefits open the doors to dark-skinned, Muslim refugees? Sweden is learning about the limits of its collectivist spirit. My story nytimes.com/2019/07/11/bus…
Not for nothing, economists have long admired Sweden for its ability to spur innovation and growth while also maintaining social harmony. People high taxes and they get generous benefits — health care, education, child care, housing
as @AdamPosen put it to me: ‘When you’re born in Sweden, you’ve won life.” But central to the benefits is the understanding that everyone has to work. The government ensures the skills, and people get jobs