Thread by @YossiGestetner

Fauci, @@ScottGottliebMD and others keep saying that past infection gives some immunity but it’s better to also have the C19 shots.

Why can’t we have running data on natural immunity? Not half-baked, misrepresented studies. Raw, steady data.

cc @drsanjaygupta @andrewrsorkin

There is data on ICU and COVID-19 deaths based on vaccination status. Why not another column on whether the person already had COVID per a PCR (and how long ago 6, 9, 12, 15 months)? Why the blackout on such critical data especially that the vaccines don’t hold like Polio, MMR?

If C19 shots stopped the spread (as Biden claimed in July 2021), and if the shots held long, you can perhaps argue everyone should get the shots for the greater good as done to other diseases. But cases R now worse than pre-vaxx and shots are not a dead end, so (next tweet)

What’s the end game? Keep sending people for shots every 3-4 months? How practical is that? A sane path would be to grasp how good/bad; long/short prior infection helps, and to make the public aware of early steps to be taken when infected to help mitigate COVID’s impact.

But alas. This path does not turn Moderna investors intro billionaires; natural immunity dosn’t fund TV ads or lobbyists; sane off ramps from COVID-19 don’t calm authoritarians’ desire to dictate the masses with rules that they ignore and off ramps don’t generate TV views either.

We are practically in a situation where the people with the power to end the chaos (elected officials and big media), have incentive to continue the craziness. Of course let’s not forget that months after leaving his job as FDA Chief, @ScottGottliebMD joined Pfizer’s board.

Does anyone think that such job prospects don’t blur the objectivity of current FDA/CDC staffers? Please. Trump’s last FDA chief went working for the firm that practically launched Moderna. This too happened within months of leaving his FDA job.

How can they set vaccine policy?

Among the masses, you have useful idiots who serve as unwitting spokespeople for a cash-generating, jobs/lobbyist ad-funding system that has incentive to keep pushing the jabs no matter its shortcoming at the expense of doing other off-ramp things that I mentioned.

When confronted with data and logic, the useful idiots turn into malfunctioning zombies who yell about “anti-vaxxers” while failing to grasp that they themselves are vaccine fanatics who serve as useful idiots for people with personal incentive to keep the chaos going.

My family and I take all the mandated-until-now shots which in these days in New York is TWENTY THREE shots (initial and boosters) before the age of 12!

Most who yell “anti-vaxxer” to the logic of such threads, are shocked to hear the 23 number.

Let’s end with this data 🔻🔻🔻

US CDC data since start of last year through 12/18/21:

6,569,413 died of all causes.

807,774 deaths were COVID-related.

65,684 under age 18 died.

668 were COVID-related.

0.08% US Covid deaths are children.

1.0% children deaths are COVID.

See for yourself 🔻🔻🔻

Considering that the shots do not stop the spread, AND breakthrough deaths in Michigan alone this year alone is DOUBLE than ALL the children COVID deaths for ALL of the US for ALL of the outbreak, then what’s the rational to force these shots on kids?

(See Michigan data🔻)

The FDA’s own paper on giving the Pfizer shots to young kids, assumes that every 1 million jabbed males age 5 through 11, cuts COVID deaths by 1; not 1 percent; but 1 person and increases ICU visits for heart issues by 57 people.

(Please see the chart. cc @drsanjaygupta )

So… again: If the C19 shots were a “dead-end” to spread as Fauci claimed earlier this year and if “you are not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations” as Biden claimed in July, we can then debate if kids should get it for the greater good despite the FDA-noted issues.

However, with spread being the same/worse as last year despite 70% vaccination; breakthrough deaths in MI alone being worse than all children COVID deaths in all of the US, plus the limited gain (and some risk) for young kids as seen from the FDA paper, this makes zero sense.