There's been lots of talk about Arsenal's new signings but let's not forget the influence of one of Arteta's much-criticised early ones. Thomas Partey was the epitome of efficiency against Norwich in what was an elite performance from a player capable of special things.
THREAD!
The role Arteta tasks Partey with is one few players in the world could carry out in a number of senses, but particularly in relation to building play. Arsenal build play with a single pivot which means that Partey is nearly entirely reliant on linking the attack and defence.
Sure, the likes of Xhaka help in this regard but Partey is the constant staple figure within that pivot. He is the linchpin & anchor in that Arsenal team - let me explain.
When Arsenal build play, Partey has to control this entire zone. Most teams have 2 players in the pivot.
The only other elite level teams who play this way are Liverpool (Fabinho), Real Madrid (Casemiro), and Manchester City (Rodri). There is a clear reason why the aforementioned teams have special players in that role - because it requires a special player to do it. Partey is that.
Okay, Arteta's elite structure enables the unit to build play in a variety of formats with the likes of Ødegaard and Xhaka dropping deep on occasion along with Tomiyasu (Ben White yesterday) inverting, but the primary responsibility lies on Partey. That is a massive show of faith
Again, within those build-up situations, when Arsenal successfully find Partey in the 1st phase, he is one of the very best progressive passers in the game which enables his team to exploit the opposition in transitional situations which is every single attackers dream.
Partey plays simple but effective passes to his teammates between the lines or in more advanced positions when so many midfielders take the easy and safer opposition by recycling the ball which delays the potential for Arsenal, or any team, to exploit the opposition in transition
Below, within a direct example of Partey's high quality pass selection & execution in the build-up, Partey has the option to #1) play a safe pass back to the goalkeeper or #2) play a progressive pass to Ødegaard which can see Arsenal exploit Norwich in transition. He passes to Ø.
However, the build-up phase isn't the only area in which Thomas Partey has significant levels of responsibility - he also has to circulate play when Arsenal are probing against a team sitting deep, & his tempered pass selections & constant availability in these moments is superb.
A second phase midfielders role when the team is sustaining an attack in the final third is to circulate play and play penetrative passes where possible. Partey enables Arsenal to sustain pressure in the final third thanks to his superb pass selection & quality in those moments.
So often deep-lying midfielders play hopeful balls into the box or try to create themselves when the team is much better off with the midfielders circulating play in an effort to keep the opposition pinned back before the team can create via combinations on the sides or in 1v1s.
Partey is one of the best circulators and passers in the sport against low blocks. He rarely forces play but regularly plays progressive passes to either flank or between the lines to enable the sustainment of attacks whilst getting the ball to attackers in dangerous positions.
Again, defensively, within these moments, Partey's positional discipline is crucial to enable the block to remain compact in defensive transition i.e. so there is not a gaping hole in midfield. This is another component that is crucial to sustaining pressure & controlling games.
Partey virtually never ventures from his defensive midfield position which is exactly what Arteta's system requires. He keeps the midfield compact and solves defensive problems before they become one as he is already present in midfield so doesn't have to recover in these moments
However, one criticism that can be attributed to Partey's game is that his pass selection is often too aggressive when the game calls for control. So, for example, when there is a midfield duel from a long goal kick & ARS regain possession - Partey often tries to be progressive.
This is a positive trait as the opposition are exploitable in transitional situations within these moments but the balance of playing aggressive passes in these situations combined with recycling to force the opposition back before sustaining an attack is the ideal balance.
Partey is primarily progressive within his passing & this can often result in failed passes because these passes are higher risk than safer, recyclable passes. As such, turnovers can often occur. Subsequently, Arsenal lose the ball in midfield, & are often forced into a low block
This results in the loss of control of the game because Arsenal don't have a sensible combination of aggressive and patience within their attack. It can lead to regular transitions which sees Arsenal lose the ball in vulnerable positions or they fall back into a deep block.
However, this is certainly an area of Partey's game that is improving. I think he is becoming more sensible with his pass selections & isn't always trying to progress play. Sometimes, when he naturally has on off day, those high-risk passes won't come off, and that's problematic.
Those are the moments Partey needs to be sensible & revert to playing safer passes to help his team regain control as opposed to losing it due to constant giveaways. This level of mental inexperience is normal for him though because he has never played for a possession based team
As such, when considering that Arteta is an elite manager & was a superb passing midfielder himself, it is a safe assumption to make that Thomas Partey will eventually master the role of a midfield player (even though he nearly already has) to become a consistently elite player.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This type of linear thinking is why football fans around the world need to change their way of thinking. All a manager can do is control the confines of his own club - if the league around him is also really good & it means they finish 5th as opposed to 4th, that's okay.
Arsenal should be looked at as a sole entity, & not in comparison to the rest of the league. The team needed a technical goalkeeper, a back up left back, a centre back alongside Gabriel, starter at right back & technical depth at CB (Tomiyasu), a #10, & CF. All boxes ticked bar 1
However, in terms of prioritisation, Arteta couldn't have done a better job. He wanted Tammy Abraham and lost out but prioritised more important holes over that such as technical quality in the build-up, depth in between the lines, a left-footed left back behind Tierney..
The best thing about Odegaard is his temperament on the ball. He excels at playmaking (playing the right pass/keeping the ball) & creating (direct play). He also creates separation to utilise his top ball striking to score goals. AND he works hard to press/arrive late in the box.
Arsenal have a star on their hands in Odegaard.
The thing that will take Odegaard to the next level is his transitional game. He is already one of the best creators in the world against low blocks and in the final third, but that transitional game from deep when Arsenal are breaking is where the elite players excel too.
Calmness is required. Arsenal are merely in the middle of a rebuild and have a top manager at the helm and the progress that has been made this season is incredibly clear. Below, in this in-depth thread I explain why calmness is required...
THREAD!
Arsenal's build-up was good & they had aggressive tactical intent but had poor quality chance creation methods due to balance + quality. Tomiyasu can't attack and neither can Xhaka. It was left to Tierney and Martinelli on the left (not even two attackers) & Saka/Ø on the right.
#1) Good build-up structure but the quality was poor with the likes of White playing daft, floated passes or under-hit passes and Party carelessly giving the ball away (yet again). Gabriel was also poor technically.
Rangnick's first game at Manchester United showcased a number of tactical intricacies which ultimately resulted in United producing a good, well-rounded & compact performance for the first time this year.
Below, in this in-depth analysis, I showcase how he achieved that.
THREAD
In possession, United set up in a 4-2-2-2 on-ball shape which afforded them an overload in the build-up, natural compactness in defensive transition thanks to the presence of the two #6's, and opportunities to progress play to the two #10's in the half spaces and split strikers.
Against Palace's settled low block, this positional play allowed for combination play on each flank and half space thanks to the positioning of the players. The fullbacks would push on to join the midfielders and attackers creating potential for combination play to take place.
In anticipation of Rangnick taking over as Manchester United manager for the remainder of the season, I decided to take a deep-dive into his practical managerial qualities. Lots have discussed his philosophy, but few have analysed it in practice. Below, I do just that.
THREAD!
Ralf Rangnick is a flexible coach who adapts his tactics & style of play to the opposition by playing a number of different tactical styles. Upon analysing some of his games in his most recent managerial stint, it's clear that his reputation as a high pressing coach is warranted.
Rangnick's philosophy and wisdom when speaking about football makes a lot of sense, but how does that translate to the practical world? Well, his managerial style matches up with his deep, intellectual analysis of the game. He prepares his team well & analyses the oppo thoroughly
Not only is Solskjaer a phenomenal man, but he is a top manager who brought Manchester United hope for the first time since Sir Alex left despite competing in the best Premier League ever. As a long-time Ole supporter, it's time for one final discussion of the great man.
THREAD!
United were void of quality when Solskjaer first arrived. He had a plethora of 'names' in attack, but none of which were outstanding at that point in their careers (Alexis/Mata were finished, Lukaku overweight, Martial flattered to deceive, Rashford rarely fit, Lingard poor form)
Behind those underwhelming attackers was a clear lack of quality too. However, Solskjaer led the team from disarray when Mourinho was sacked to a miraculous run of form thanks to his cautious tactical adaptations against the likes of PSG & controlled displays against lesser teams