If you want to know the reason why @woodyholtonusc "disengaged" from any discussion of the 1619 Project with me, it's this:
He became incensed when I posted screenshots of his pal Nikole Hannah-Jones's abusiveness toward her critics on twitter.
@woodyholtonusc A sample of that abusiveness, which Hannah-Jones has since sent down the memory hole...
@woodyholtonusc Apparently, Holton thinks that this sort of behavior is entirely acceptable and warranted...provided that it comes from an ideological friend who also happens to be hocking Holton's latest book in the national media.
@MasterClass The lesson itself appears to be a rehashing of Matthew Desmond's error-riddled essay from the 1619 Project. Desmond himself was not an expert in that subject when she recruited him to write. The problems are apparent in his essay.
@MasterClass Hannah-Jones is even less-equipped to teach this subject than Desmond.
In August 2019 I pointed out some elementary errors stemming from Desmond's reliance on the debunked work of historian Ed Baptist. @nhannahjones was not even aware that Baptist's work had problems.
This is someone who has plainly not read the criticisms. In particular, pay attention to the problems with the Matthew Desmond essay. They are substantial and cut to the core of his argument about what he mislabels as "capitalism."
As for NHJ's essay, it is hardly a fresh or novel account. It is historiographically an extension of decades-old arguments by Lerone Bennett (on both the Revolution and Lincoln/the Civil War), although much less persuasively presented.
Bennett was at times a polemicist (I met him a decade ago and he openly admitted that!) but had a grasp of scholarly debates & made original contributions. Before my work, he was one of the only sources to give a serious look at Lincoln's colonization commissioner James Mitchell.
Of the 12 feature essays in the original 1619 Project, only *two* were written by historians. Both were historians of the 20th century - not experts in the Am. Revolution, the Civil War, or slavery.
@nhannahjones One of those essays is by Khalil Gibran Muhammad - a specialist in 20th century urban history - and received little if any criticism.
@nhannahjones The second was by Kevin Kruse, another 20th century historian who is better known for his twitter feed than his scholarship.
Also, a month ago I caught Kruse in what appears to be an act of plagiarism in his published academic work.
@nhannahjones I will have a longer review of the book out shortly that also examines the errors I found in Matthew Desmond's original 1619 Project essay. @Jakesilverstein and the NYT outright refused to correct those errors...then quietly did so without acknowledging it in the book version.
@nhannahjones@jakesilverstein I also have receipts. Here is one of the corrections that Silverstein refused to make in February 2020.
When the book version came out last month however, the claim about Microsoft Excel's connections to slavery was quietly removed.
When recently asked to comment on the Collins/Fauci email scandal over the ordered "take down" of the Great Barrington Declaration, the NIH referred a reporter to the Wikipedia page of the GBD.
Because "science," or something.
And speaking of Wikipedia, here's an experiment for you. Try proposing an edit on that page that documents Collins and Fauci's collusion to launch a media smear campaign against the GBD.