Thread by @OptimisticCon

Many of these are the same people who've quit civilian jobs.
Now they'll be driven out of the Guard & Reserve, which are prioritizing mobilized troops for vax deadlines.
Sensible posture wd be: (1) "Vax" & non-vax treatment measures widely available. 1/7

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1475527434044944385

(2) Vax reqmt at discretion of health care orgs. Not blanket orders & job threats from govs/mayors.
(3) Mil policies may incl vax & treatment; *must* offer treatment. No withholding treatment options.
(4) NO general fed mandates.
(5) NO mandates at any level for minors.
2/7

(6) Transparency on record/analysis of all vax/treatment info. NO search engine/social media censorship. Censorship *correctly* makes public suspicious & cynical.
Makes sense for health orgs to require "vax" for some jobs/roles, now that they're available. Already the case...3/7

...for a number of disease vaxes. No reason why shouldn't be done for COVID-19 - *when vax has final FDA approval (not EUA).*
But must not be politicized anywhere w/govt endorsement. No BS/false claims about "stopping spread" of disease, which vax manifestly does not do. 4/7

Intense politicization, false/constantly changing claims, lockdowns, "passports," & overkill for access to general public venues, threats issued by govts, media censorship - these are why COVID vax isn't seen as simply being like other vaxes... 5/7

... typically req'd for certain situations (health care, food workers, military, childhood diseases & public school).
If COVID "vax" settled out to annual shot like flu, VOLUNTARY except for limited situational reqmts like above, most ppl wd readily accept that. 6/7

For the record, I care a lot more about everyone else than you do.
Just getting there first with that pointless, absurd virtue-signaling claim. 7/7