If we had a vaccine for Ebola (kills 80% say) would you think a resulting infection would be:
Forgot "don't know", you can just put that one in the comments or something.
I actually never looked for any information about a vaccine. If there is a vaccine and we know the result, go on post. I rather suspect trends #2.
I'm not worried about spoiling what is clearly not a scientific poll because I didn't get ethics approval for this poll anyway.
I'm not worried about spoiling what is clearly not a scientific poll because I didn't get ethics approval for this poll anyway.
Whole thing is a facetious joke to make you think about outcomes of a serious disease with a vaccine.
For interest, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… discusses an Ebola vax, but not the signs/symptoms of those ~40 who had Ebola.
For interest, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… discusses an Ebola vax, but not the signs/symptoms of those ~40 who had Ebola.
Just food for thought:
Should we rely on vaccines as an only line of defence for a serious disease? Do vaccines mitigate all serious outcomes or all outcomes whatsoever?
Can vaxxed people still die? How many?
Are vaccines foolproof? How quickly can we roll out new ones?
Should we rely on vaccines as an only line of defence for a serious disease? Do vaccines mitigate all serious outcomes or all outcomes whatsoever?
Can vaxxed people still die? How many?
Are vaccines foolproof? How quickly can we roll out new ones?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
