Context thread:
• The defense bill is DOUBLE the COMBINED costs of COVID stimulus + infrastructure + Build Back Better. (Where are the deficit hawks like @Sen_JoeManchin?)
• And it's unnecessary: U.S. defense $ exceed Russia + China + the next 9 countries COMBINED. ... 1/
@Sen_JoeManchin Some will argue, as @BroadbrainTV does here, that it's ok because "the defense bill is a jobs bill." And that's sort of true: the defense industry accounts for at least 800,000 jobs and 10% of U.S. manufacturing. is.gd/Brn8g0 ...
2/...
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV But as a job creator, defense sucks. About 14MM people work in manufacturing; at 10% of total manufacturing, defense should employ about 1.4MM, but actually employs about half that, because defense toys' materials, research, etc. are expensive compared to labor cost. ...
3/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So: national defense is important, but the U.S. would be perfectly secure with a fraction of what we spend. Again: we spend more than Russia, China, and the next 9 countries (most of them our allies!) COMBINED. 4/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV And yes, jobs are important, except "clean energy and health care spending create 50 percent more jobs than the equivalent amount of spending on the military. Education spending creates more than twice as many jobs." is.gd/1ZhBoI; is.gd/JDjAde 5/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So if we don't need it militarily, and could create more jobs by spending the same $ on domestic programs, WHY do we spend so much on defense?
Congress. The invisible third leg of the "military-industrial complex" that hippie peacenik Dwight Eisenhower warned us about. 6/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV I mean, it's not JUST Congress, but Congress is the key, because defense contractors have carefully ensured that every single Congresscritter has a stake in defense spending. There's no district that doesn't have defense jobs: ...
7/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV "The defense industry has carefully crafted business to maximize congressional interest. The new Ford-class aircraft carrier is built of parts that are made in 330 of 435 congressional districts and forty-five states." is.gd/kvvuVF 8/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV (Quote above is from some hippie peacenik source... (checks notes)... the U.S. Military Academy at West Point website.) 9/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV And this crap doesn't just hurt the U.S. people economically. It affects foreign policy, and makes us LESS safe!
E.g.: one 9f the largest recipients of U.S. military aid is Israel – a wealthy country that already has the strongest military in its region (incl. 60 nukes). ...
10/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV Israel doesn't need U.S. aid. Israel's use of American-paid-for, American-made weapons (incl. in its illegal occupation of Palestinian land and repression of Palestinian protesters) are a HUGE reason many in the Islamic world fear and hate us. It's one reason 9/11 happened.
11/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So if our military aid to Israel isn't needed by Israel, doesn't strengthen the U.S. militarily (we have no bases there), and poisons many people's perceptions of the U.S., why do we give it?
Because that aid comes with a catch: Israel must spend our $ on U.S.-MADE weapons.
12/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So U.S. military aid to Israel (and to many other countries) is really a slush fund: under the guise of "foreign aid," we're actually just giving U.S. taxpayer $ to the U.S. defense industry. 13/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV To sum up:
• Showing "fiscal discipline" by voting against BBB or other domestic programs while ignoring the bloated defense budget is, as Garrison Keillor once put it, like trying to lose weight by giving up anchovies. (Hi, @Sen_JoeManchin, you disingenuous putz!) 16/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV • Congresscritters worried about constituents' defense jobs should pay more attention to the reality that defense spending is COSTING their constituents jobs, because MORE people could be well-employed by spending those $ on butter, not guns. ...
17/
• We voters and activists need to pressure our representatives to acknowledge Ike's truth: that both national security AND employment would not only be preserved, but BETTER served, by radically reducing the "defense" budget and investing the $ in people instead.
18/18
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV P.S.: Also, and always, f*ck @Sen_JoeManchin and his faux concern for fiscal discipline. You can't be a serious deficit hawk AND vote for the bloated defense budget, you schmuck.
P.P.S.: Great comment from @BroadbrainTV. The decoupling is the key.
Holy HELL, @bootbarn. My wife and I went into your Tualatin, OR store, + as we entered a family of five was leaving – none masked. Then the employee who greeted me (quite cheerfully!) had her mask under her nose...
1/
@bootbarn Then I counted six other maskless customers + another employee with a mask half-off.
We left immediately.
Because we're not stupid, we respect the law, and we don't want to die.
2/
@bootbarn Oregon law requires masks. I understand that some people see going maskless as a political statement, but it's the LAW.
And science is science. If my vet said I needed to mask to keep my animals safe from an infectious disease, I'd wear it. Because science is f*cking SCIENCE.
3/
The Taliban weren't involved with 9/11. A council of 600 senior AfPak Muslim clerics – essentially the Taliban's governing body – expressed dismay at the 9/11 attacks and offered to expel bin Laden from the country.
The Taliban acknowledged that 9/11 violated Islamic law – but remember, bin Laden initially denied being behind the attacks. At the time, even the U.S. only labeled him a "prime suspect," stopping short of saying we were sure he did it.
That uncertainty was VERY significant.
2/
Muslim ethics require protecting guests from their enemies – UNLESS the guest has done something to bring trouble on the host. The Taliban COULDN'T surrender bin Laden without evidence he was behind 9/11 (ie, committed a crime while in sanctuary). usip.org/publications/2… 3/
Today's testimony by Capitol Police officers about the Jan. 6 insurrection is making me rethink the Boston Massacre, which in hindsight sounds more like 1/6 than a righteous revolutionary act.
1/
Eight soldiers guarding a government building were surrounded by 300-400 angry "patriots" hitting them with clubs, rocks, chunks of ice, oyster shells, lumps of coal; many in the crowd taunting the soldiers to fire, others warning them that if they do, the crowd will kill them;
2
; the crowd close enough to hit the soldiers with clubs; one witness testifies Crispus Attucks actually grabbed a soldier's bayonet (which, true or not, means they were CLOSE).
A stick thrown from the back makes a soldier fall down + drop his gun; he retrieves it;...
3/
.@RadioFreeTom's written an interesting thread here, but I keep thinking back to this old discussion where he said that conservatism's main feature isn't standing for things, but standing against them:
@RadioFreeTom That's the classic Buckleyesque statement of conservatism that all '80s college students (including both Tom and I) learned: that a conservative is someone who "stands athwart history, yelling Stop."
I just read the Anglo-Saxon/America First Caucus statement of (so-called) principles, and it's clear that the writers used "Anglo-Saxon" only because "Aryan" already was taken. It's the Racist/Nativist Caucus.
Here are some thoughts about "our" "Anglo Saxon" roots: 1/
Immigrants and invaders. Germanic ones. Nothing "native" about them.
"Saxon" = "Germanic." "Anglo" = "the subset of Germanics who ran England for a while."
2/
And those foreigners arriving unwanted on British shores didn't respect the culture they found when they arrived: there was "hostility between incomers and natives... violence, destruction, massacre, and the flight of the Romano-British population."
3/
“I got on a bus in 1982, from the hills of Tennessee. I had $1,200 sewn into my underpants by my mother and I arrived in LA and found West Hollywood, which is where I currently live.”
He trained as a jockey with Argentinian trainer Horatio Luro. “He was a lady’s man – he said to me once: ‘When I die, I want to come back as a lady’s saddle so I’ll be between the two things I love the most.’"