.@RadioFreeTom's written an interesting thread here, but I keep thinking back to this old discussion where he said that conservatism's main feature isn't standing for things, but standing against them:
1/
@RadioFreeTom That's the classic Buckleyesque statement of conservatism that all '80s college students (including both Tom and I) learned: that a conservative is someone who "stands athwart history, yelling Stop."

It's essentially nihilistic...
3/
@RadioFreeTom ... and I'd be curious whether Tom (and the other NT conservatives) still believes Buckley was correct in defining conservatism that way, or whether he's realized that by "stop!" Buckley meant "preserve the current unjust system that put people like us on top."
4/
@RadioFreeTom Because the original sin of modern conservatism was not populism or Trumpism. It was Buckley's essentially racist, classist nihilism, the conservative opposition to all progress, that seeded the GOP's current rot. And it was full-fledged in the '50s.
5/
@RadioFreeTom Until Never Trump conservatives can stop admiring conservatism's supposed intellectualism, + admit that the "intellectual crust" (incl. modern conservatism's Founding Father, Buckley) WAS ITSELF conservatism's "nasty base," I fear they're still lost...
6/
@RadioFreeTom I fear even NT conservatism still defines itself as shaping and improving progress, rather than by the kneejerk impulse to yell "stop!" When conservatives begin defining themselves as people who actually advance policies that move our nation forward, I'll be glad!...
7/
@RadioFreeTom I'd value a conservatism that says, "yes, this train must advance, but let's slow a little for that hairpin turn." That's what Romney did by advancing an early version of the Affordable Care Act in Mass. But the other 99.9% of conservatives opposed it. They yelled "stop."
8/
@RadioFreeTom Conservatives can't pretend to be a party of ideas and ideals, while still defining themselves primarily, as Tom once put it, as people who generally oppose policies rather than advancing them.

Bec, again, that's the nihilistic, amoral root rot of modern conservatism:
9/
@RadioFreeTom Buckley's famous "stop!" ALWAYS was window dressing for "preserve an imperfect, unjust status quo." Anyone who can't see the direct link between Buckley's posh racism and Trump's gutter racism still has scales on their eyes.
10/
@RadioFreeTom But I'd love to hear that Tom et al. see this now! I truly would!

In my mind, the starting point would be for Tom to say, "Buckley was dead wrong. Progress is good! We should've blocked fewer policies and shaped more of them, and New Conservatism will do that going forward."
11/
@RadioFreeTom For decades now, Buckleyesque conservatism has pretended to endorse travel while tearing up the tracks. Conservative values are HELPFUL when they function as brakes that know when to slow the train, and also when NOT to slow it. Conservatism can make progress surer, safer...
12/
@RadioFreeTom But it has to define itself in terms of progress, not obstruction. A new "yes, but also" conservatism would be good for America.

That means redefining itself in terms of advancing and shaping policies, not opposing them.
13/
@RadioFreeTom But a "new" conservatism that blames its "nasty base" while still admiring its "intellectual crust" – that thinks the GOP's problem is Trump or populism, rather than its Buckley roots, racist pseudointellectualism, opposition to change – falls short.

I hope for better.
/fin
@RadioFreeTom P.S.: I should add that I AGREE with everything @RadioFreeTom says in his @TheAtlantic article (theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…), except for paragraph 6 and his belief that Reagan-era Republicans actually stood optimistically FOR something. It's a good piece that liberals should read.
@RadioFreeTom @TheAtlantic P.P.S./correction: tweet 7 above should say, "I fear even Never Trump conservatism still defines itself by the kneejerk impulse to yell "stop!", rather than as shaping and improving progress," rather than vice versa.

Management regrets the error.
7/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with M.S. Bellows, Jr.

M.S. Bellows, Jr. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @msbellows

17 Apr
I just read the Anglo-Saxon/America First Caucus statement of (so-called) principles, and it's clear that the writers used "Anglo-Saxon" only because "Aryan" already was taken. It's the Racist/Nativist Caucus.

Here are some thoughts about "our" "Anglo Saxon" roots:
1/
First, who WERE the "Anglo-Saxons," anyway?

Immigrants and invaders. Germanic ones. Nothing "native" about them.

"Saxon" = "Germanic." "Anglo" = "the subset of Germanics who ran England for a while."
2/
And those foreigners arriving unwanted on British shores didn't respect the culture they found when they arrived: there was "hostility between incomers and natives... violence, destruction, massacre, and the flight of the Romano-British population."
3/
Read 25 tweets
2 Apr
This is a wonderful read. Some great quotes + stories. I'll thread a few of them (but not all):
“I got on a bus in 1982, from the hills of Tennessee. I had $1,200 sewn into my underpants by my mother and I arrived in LA and found West Hollywood, which is where I currently live.”
He trained as a jockey with Argentinian trainer Horatio Luro. “He was a lady’s man – he said to me once: ‘When I die, I want to come back as a lady’s saddle so I’ll be between the two things I love the most.’"

IT. MEEEE!!!!
Read 5 tweets
31 Mar
(CW: child sexual abuse)

Matt Gaetz, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Joel Greenburg, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Ghislaine Maxwell, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Jeffrey Epstein, Republican: child sex trafficker....
1/
... Ralph Shortey, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Tim Nolan, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Earl “Butch” Kimmerling, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Jon Matthews, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Stephen White, Republican: child sex trafficker...
2/
John Hathaway, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Howard L. Brooks, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Marty Glickman, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Jeffrey Patti, Republican: child sex trafficker.
Robert Bauman, Republican: child sex trafficker...
3/
Read 7 tweets
26 Mar
I hope John Roberts has a sleepless night tonight.

The Civil Rights Act of 1965 used to have a "preclearance" requirement that forced historically racist jurisdictions to obtain DOJ approval before changing their voting laws (like Georgia just did).
1/
SCOTUS struck that down in Shelby County v. Holder (2013). Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority that the problem of state voting discrimination had largely disappeared:

"Nearly 50 years later, things have changed dramatically...

2/
"In the covered jurisdictions, '[v]oter turnout and registration rates now approach parity. Blatantly discriminatory evasions of federal decrees are rare. And minority candidates hold office at unprecedented levels.'...

3/
Read 8 tweets
25 Mar
IN DEFENSE OF JOE MANCHIN: an obnoxiously lengthy historopragmatic thread. (Also, goodbye my mentions.)

1/whotheheckknows
There are many words we could use to describe Joe Manchin, who’s one of the senators (though, importantly, not the ONLY senator) holding up filibuster reform:

Aggravating. Obstructive. Antediluvian.

But only one adjective matters: Democrat.
Joe Manchin is a Democrat from West Virginia.

That’s fucking remarkable.

Let's talk about how fucking remarkable that is, the historical and demographic reasons why it's remarkable, and why (even when he pisses us) off we attack him at our peril.
Read 45 tweets
19 Mar
I have a rule: never become incensed based on a report that doesn't include a link.

So I researched this law.

NOW I'm incensed.
1/
A few points about this pro-bigotry bill in Arkansas:
• The bill, which the governor will sign, doesn't apply to emergency procedures, because federal law won't allow that...
2/
But it does allow discrimination (including by religious orgs, ie, religious hospitals?) in non-emergency procedures for any reason except race.

• To their credit, huge Arkansas employers/campaign contributors @Walmart and @TysonFoods both opposed the bill.
3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(