#dailynotes about @ensdomains 🐿️

1) 听了 @nicksdjohnson@futurealisha 的播客,subdomain是亮点

- ENS一级域名会在以太主网上,subdomain会在L2上
- ENS既是NFT又是域名(domain),nick讲可组合性(composability)要重点探索

open.spotify.com/episode/6DoSUL…
@ensdomains @nicksdjohnson @futurealisha 35'43 说一个叫the guild(工会)的游戏里 好像说每个工会名.eth都可以用subdomain召集工会成员。

- 说到基于subdomain的应用场景,比如交易所可以给他的用户(user.exchange.eth),主要的nft项目给他的owner(123.blitmap.eth)
2)和developer @fushang318 老哥聊subdomain

- 不同的子域名作为某个垂直应用的名片。

比如 twitter.jessie.eth 可以直接找到我的 twitter。eth 域名可以天然作为每个人以后的名片,wechat.jessie.eth 可以直接给我发微信信息
- 通过ENS 解析里的内容哈希,现在 ENS 域名就可以建一个以IPFS为内容载体的网站

相关💾:如何将 ENS 域名解析至 IPFS 上存储的内容并通过 EthLink 访问
ensuser.com/guides/setcont…
- 一级ENS不代表一个人,代表一个组织

比如nick在播客里说到guild(工会),然后我就想到@supdrive 游戏里的红绿蓝三队,是不是将来也可以 jessie .green.sup.eth
- 域名解析器可以扩展

除了公共解析器,放大家都知道的信息,比如ETH钱包,内容HASH,BTC,twitter 等等。或许你可以编写自己的解析器,在域名里存放自己想放的内容--比如 会员.工会.eth 可以把会员的等级权限信息放到解析器上。 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with jessie.eth🦇🔊|mapping web3 via words

jessie.eth🦇🔊|mapping web3 via words Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JESSCATE93

31 Dec 21
#dailynotes about @ensdomains 🕸️

做了一个数据挖掘小实验(感谢我飞哥 @fushang318!) crypto twitter with ENS names,其中一些地址非常吸引眼球,简单说一下今儿的发现: Image
1)两者(就crypto twitter和链上地址)的关系并不对等,神秘人出现。

我指的神秘人是指比如他在社交媒体上是一张白纸,但链上行为像海绵宝宝。比如拥有500个ENS with twitter 个位数的followers,

do the math.
这让我思考:我们要追随的KOL似乎要被重新思考什么是K-0-L? 以及KOL们在社交媒体上发出的每个人都能听到的信号,究竟是滞后信号,还是滞后信号?

(别误会,我只是想说📶可以多维度去捕捉,Numbers/traffic parametres 在web3上我觉得就不超前,网络network才是关键-->我会关注能map出它的所有努力
Read 11 tweets
30 Dec 21
#dailynotes about @ensdomains 🍀

看了ENS生态中的项目(没看完),挑出了一些觉得好玩儿的,大部分都是play out with onchain data 进行的可视化
ens.domains/#home-ecosystem Image
1)@nicoglennon 做的 eth.af
👽来看你的钱包啦!目前支持ENS直接搜索 Image
2)@pbianciottodev 做的ERCGraph.live 是可交互的分析和可视化工具,显示整个以太坊网络的ERC-20 token的流动

这是ETHOnline 2020 Hackathon项目, idea 源自etherblocks.live

数据集来着 @MetaMask , @POKTnetwork@graphprotocol ImageImage
Read 9 tweets
23 Sep 21
we have been thinking about the relationship between __data__ and NFTs @OwnershipLabs (roaming 🧵)

The data is not the result, not the final output, but the time you spend on the web and the process you interact with it, the "footprint🦶" of your attention.
It sounds a bit abstract, as if my attention 👀 is a real person with 🦶. It wanders around the web, stops at a blog, applauds in front of a JPG, goes for a video and gets high all afternoon... This series of footprints are recorded.
And here's another example
Jessie wrote an article that cited 10 NFTs, all of which were not just a JPG or video, but relationships with context, altogether they formed a network of relationships.
Read 25 tweets
5 May 21
My life goal is to bridge tools for thoughts and the blockchain, the purpose is to make human thoughts valuable. but there is something missing between people's thoughts and the pure blockchain,I m always thinking about this, what is it?
first, let's talk about the roles of each.
tools for thoughts, with the best representation of roam, is the private deep-thinking self that conducts synthesis and makes creations. It is networked being just like your brain, everything is connected so it's not easy to filter or even share.
the blockchain, with all the beings like defi,nft stuff, is the trusted medium of exchange.The blockchain makes things more liquidate ,attributes things with timestamp so people could have ownership.
so again, what's missing between the two?

i think it's curation.
Read 18 tweets
3 Apr 21
@sapinker Pinker said in [[the stuff of thought]] that a verb is a framework, not just a word to refer to an action.

I find that when I communicate with native eng speakers, sometimes you just say two words and they basically know what you want to say.
This reminds me of the natural habit of language learning (and I think it works, although most people get overly hung up on grammar): sentences are built around their verbs. (a concept here called verb construction)
Instead of studying grammar in detail, I prefer to stretch the boundaries of communication. The difference between the two is

The former favors "accuracy", while the latter emphasizes "matching". The former is for research, the latter for communication.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(