Share this page!

Adam Wagner Profile picture
Twitter logo
29 Dec 21, 4 tweets, 1 min read
Huge error by the BBC
Alan Dershowitz used the interview to try and discredit Virginia Giuffre
All the BBC had to do was Google him
BBC statement - not an apology but an acknowledgement he was not suitable as an impartial analyst

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

Adam Wagner Profile picture
16 Dec 21
* we are also simultaneously criminalising various forms of peaceful protest
** but that is speech we don't like! So it's ok
*** WOKE BRIGADE!
Read 5 tweets
Adam Wagner Profile picture
15 Dec 21
This is interesting. People are leaving hotel quarantine after Red List emptied - govt telling them not to and that details of "early release" (nb the govt denies this is detention but hey ho) coming later.

But regulations don't allow for early release
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/1434… ImageImage
There is also this - appears to be an intention to realise. This is legally complicated unless there is a law change - I suppose everyone could be designated a "relevant person" by the Secretary of State who will then direct them to isolate at home. But not straightforward Image
Actually, I'm not sure the Secretary of State has the power to designate people as relevant persons unless they fall within one of the express categories in Schedule 11 to the regulations. And "the minister has told me I can leave" isn't a listed reason for leaving quarantine ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
Adam Wagner Profile picture
15 Dec 21
Haven't got time at the moment to tweet the key bits but two really important @UKSupremeCourt human rights judgments this morning:
- Ellan-Cane on non-binary "unspecified" gender on passports (E-C's appeal rejected)
- McKenna on NI Troubles investigation (appeal allowed in part) ImageImage
Here are the links:
Ellan-Cane: supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-202…
McKenna supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-202…
I haven't summarised McKenna above as I actually don't understand exactly what has been ruled from the press summary! Will have a proper read later
Ellan-Cane includes an important discussion on the "mirror principle", i.e. the extent to which our domestic human rights case law should mirror the European Court of Human Rights case law. Says, I think, UK courts should go no further than ECtHR but there is some wriggle room... Image
Read 7 tweets
Adam Wagner Profile picture
14 Dec 21
This government may be the first in the history of liberal democracies which enacts a bill of rights which has the effect of reducing rather than increasing rights protections.
If there are other examples, please let me know!

This is like enacting a Clean Air Act which opens five new coal power stations
If I was responsible for these proposals I would be embarrassed. The idea that public authorities can't breach rights if implementing primary legislation. Or making human rights claims harder to bring by adding needless bureaucracy. Removing rights entirely from certian people...
Read 7 tweets
Adam Wagner Profile picture
14 Dec 21
So now we know why the govet has sat on its Independent Human Rights Act Review report for weeks - it is far more modest than the govt wanted. The govt's proposals for a bill of rights include some which go much further and would be regressive. Same as it did with judicial review
Government approach:
1. "This is very complicated we need an independent expert view"
2. Govt commission said experts - with total control over who it appoints
3. Experts give answer govt doesn't want
4. Govt ignores experts
5. Government consults on non-expert led proposals
6. Government ignores consultation and enacts regressive "bill of rights" which uniquely perhaps in the history of democracy bills of rights, reduces rather than increases rights protections
Read 4 tweets
Adam Wagner Profile picture
14 Dec 21
The Bill of Rights consultation has been launched
gov.uk/government/con…

Consultation document here: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
What we really need to see in the Independent Human Rights Act review document which is meant to be published alongside this.

The govt has had it for weeks without publishing so my guess is it wasn't exactly what they were hoping for
Useful to go to the end first as this is where the actual proposed changes to the Human Rights Act are - in Appendix 2
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @AdamWagner1 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @AdamWagner1!

Read all threads by @AdamWagner1

:(