1
Could today’s technology exist without the invention of number systems, zero, decimals, algebra, trigonometry, algorithms, etc.? Many historians credit Arab scholars, for these ideas, but Arab records themselves reveal that they learnt these concepts from the Hindus of India.
2
As far back as 772 CE, a great Indian astronomer visited the Baghdad court of Caliph al-Mansur. He shared astronomy & math formulas from the Brahma-Sphuta-Siddhanta of Brahmagupta(~628 CE). Famous astronomer Al-Fazari translated it - in a book called “Al-Sindhind al-Kabir”
3
Concepts from Brâhma-Sphuta-Siddhânta of Brahmagupta & Sûrya-Siddhânta, were translated from Persian into Arabic in a book called Al-Sindhind al-Kabir” referring to Al-Kabîr (great) & "sindhind" as “centuries of centuries”. The astronomical tables were called "zij as- Shah"
4
Brahmagupta's Brahma-Sphuta-Siddhanta elaborated on astronomy & the initial origins of Pati-ganita (algorithms), Bija-ganita (algebra) - operations, using zero, negative numbers, indeterminate equations, “Pythagorean” triples & interpolation formulas for computing sines.
5
One of the Arab world’s most famous mathematicians from the “House of Wisdom” at Baghdad, Al-Khwārizmī (780-850 CE) edited 2 versions of the zij as-Sindhind (astronomical tables) from these translations of Hindu works - which formed the basis of his mathematical knowledge.
6
Al-Khwārizmī is so famous that the Latin versions of his name & book are considered to be the origin of the terms "algorithm" & "algebra". Al-Khwarizmî’s most famous book is on the topic of arithmetic formulas, most of which he explicitly borrowed from India.
7
The original Arabic version of his book was lost, but a Latin translation (8th c. )“Algoritmi de numero Indorum” ( Al-Khwārizmī on the Hindu Art of Reckoning) clearly shows that even the title of his book attributed the Hindus with numerals & arithmetical calculations.
8
Al-Khwārizmī's work was critical as it first transmitted crucial mathematical concepts such as Hindu numerals, zero as a placeholder, decimal numeration & place value system developed by the Hindus to the Western world, becoming the foundation of all modern mathematics today.
9
Al-Khwārizmī was an advocate of the Hindu place value system based on 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 0 & how it simplified mathematics. In his treatise on Hindu numerals, his phrase “Dixit Algorizmi” (meaning simply "Al-Khwarizmî has said") became the word “algorithm” used today.
10
Khwarzimi's specific mention of the “sign rule”for multiplying algebraic quantities can be traced to the Kuttaka-ganita of Brahmagupta (7th c. CE) whose method of solving indeterminate quadratic equations, including Pell's equation & chakravala method -a cyclic algorithm.
11
Another famous Arab mathematician who based his works on Hindu mathematics was Al-Karajî (953-1029 CE). He is famous for his work on algebra & polynomials. Among historians, his most widely studied work is his algebra book "al-fakhri fi al-jabr wa al-muqabala".
12
Al Karaji is said to have introduced the theory of algebraic calculus, given the first formulation of the binomial coefficients & discovered the binomial theorem. But Al-Karaji’s works clearly reveal that he too based most of his knowledge on the ideas of Hindu mathematicians.
13
In his book, Al-Karajî focuses on addition, subtraction & extraction of square roots of irrational numerical polynomials. He gives an example of the extraction of the square root of the sum of a number of irrational roots without mentioning its Hindu origin.
14
This polynomial is already found in Kuttaka-Ganita by Brahmagupta (6th. c). The same polynomial is also found in Bhâskara II's (1114- 1185 CE), Bijaganita. Yet historians credited Al-Karajî with the invention when it was obvious both were only extending Brahmagupta's idea.
15
Al-Karajî’s method of extraction of square root of an algebraic polynomial is attributed to Hindus by Al-Karajî himself. He informs us that he followed the method used in “Indian reckoning” (hisâb al-Hind) to extract square roots of “known quantities”, of numerical polynomials
16
Al-Karajî’s student, Al-Samaw’al (1130-1180 CE) is credited with extending arithmetic operations to handle polynomials & using induction. In his book Al-Bâhir (The Dazzling), he too clearly attributes the method of division of two algebraic polynomials to the Hindus of India.
17
Al-Samawal was 13, when he began serious study, starting with the Hindu methods of calculation and study of astronomical tables. In his book, he elaborates a general method for extraction of square roots which applies to both polynomial term addition & subtraction.
18
He attributed this discovery to himself, but at the end of the chapter he gives the “sign rule”, in the most complete form found in the mathematics of Islam. As mentioned earlier, this complete “sign rule” already appears in the Kuttaka-ganita of Brahmagupta (7th c. CE).
19
Al-Samawal also mentions rules for multiplying & dividing algebraic quantities. These rules were described more completely by Bhâskara II. Both mathematicians lived during the same era, but Bhāskara II was extending the established tradition of Hindu mathematics before him.
20
Historical records by Arab mathematicians reveal they acquired & attributed much of their mathematical knowledge to Indian masters. Hindus invented the foundations of modern mathematics but the Arabs deserve credit for translating these ideas & disseminating them to Europe.
21
Beginning with the Vedas which expressed infinity, nothingness & huge numbers as combinations of powers of 10, to the algorithms which allow you to read this tweet & run the world today, none of it would be possible without the Hindu genius for mathematics.
22
Hindus must claim their mathematical heritage & correct such myths, but it's even more important to preserve, study, analyze & extend the knowledge of our ancient masters. Many of their brilliant insights still lie undeciphered, which may help humanity scale greater heights.
23
Sources:
“India’s contribution to Arab Mathematics” by Khalil Jaouiche, Indian Journal of History of Science, 46.2 (2011)
A History of Mathematics by Carl Boyer

Muhammad
Ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, Le calcul indien, by A. Allard

Britannica.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Savitri Mumukshu - सावित्री मुमुक्षु

Savitri Mumukshu - सावित्री मुमुक्षु Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MumukshuSavitri

Jun 21
This LIE that Brahmanas burnt down Nalanda will be put to rest once & for all with this 🧵of undeniable evidence

The book that is being cited to support this horrific lie is Taranatha’s “History of Buddhism in India”. First this book is not considered a histiography because it cites many supernatural miracles to glorify Buddhism. However even if we ignore all that, Taranatha himself provides the unexpected clues that leftists deliberatrly leave out to distort history.

The first clue is that Taranatha describes the history of Sri Nalendra (Nalanda) in elaborate detail as a monastery where “more than a 1000 Brahmans & an EQUAL number of Tirthikas took up ordination”
This CLEARLY proves that in Taranatha’s context Tirthikas & Hindu Brahmanas were NOT the same otherwise why would he mention them as SEPARATE categories in the same sentence?

In another reference Taranatha clearly refers to Buddhists converting BOTH Brahmanas & Tirthikas to Buddhism in Gujarat. Why would he say this if they were one & the same? Yet another reference refers to Buddhists separately defeating a Nirgrantha, a Brahmana & a Tirthika in a debate.

Clearly Brahmana & Tirthika were separate categories.Image
Image
Image
Image
Now that Taranatha’s own passages have established that Brahmanas & Tirthikas were NOT the same, let’s see what the real role of Brahmanas was as described by Taranatha himself.

In chapter 20, Taranatha describes the famous episode of the king’s minister holding an inaugral feast at a temple in Nalanda, where Buddhist Sramanas bullied two Tirthika beggars & unleashed dogs on them. This angered them so much that they practiced austerities to gain Siddhis & take revenge

After 12 years the Tirthika attained Siddhis, & performed a fire worship whose ashes produced fire which burnt down Nalanda & its libraries. But the most CRUCIAL part that Leftists like DN Jha cleverly leave out of Taranatha’s account is at the end of the story where Taranatha says that the Nalanda “temples damaged by the fire were reconstructed by King Buddhapaksa, the BRAHMANA Śanku, the BRAHMANA Brihaspati & many householders.”

In the next chapter, Tarantha further describes how this same Brahmana Śanku knew esoteric magic about Nagas & was a devout Hindu who built a Vaisnavite Garuda Stambha for protection against snakebites. Thus there is no question that Śanku clearly was a Hindu Brahmana.

This is conclusive proof that Brahmanas were not involved in the burning of Nalanda & its libraries, but they actively reconstructed & rebuilt the structures at Nalanda after the fire. This decisively busts leftist lies about Brahminical fanatics persecuting Buddhists.Image
Image
Image
The fact that Brahmanas constantly helped Buddhists is further corroborated by Tibetan Buddhist monk Dharmasvamin (1235 AD) who visited Nalanda & Bihar a few decades after Khalji had destroyed Nalanda & other Buddhist Viharas of Magadha. He describes Hindus giving alms to Buddhist monks & a Brahmana named Jayadeva saving the last Buddhist abbot of Nalanda, Rahul’s Sri Bhadra from a Muslim attack

Ramasimha the Hindu Raja of Tirhut even asked Dharmasvamin to become his chaplain. And even when he refused, the Hindu king respectfully showered him with valuable presents. This was the true face of Hindus, who despite debate & conflict lived harmoniously with BuddhistsImage
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 21
Is this some kind of joke? Can you deny the evidence provided by Tipu Sultan himself in his OWN words in letters & his manifesto describing his desire to wipe out Hinduism & mass convert Hindus by his sword, for the "Glory of I-slum"?

In his own letters "Ghazi" Tipu Sultan gloats about forcibly converting 50,000 Hindu prisoners from Coorg into the "Ahmedy" class of new Mohammadan converts. During the attack on Coorg he specifically instructed his soldiers to mass circumcise not just the living but even DEAD corpses of Hindu prisoners from Coorg!Image
Image
Image
Image
2000 Hindu Nāyars at Kuttippuram, Kerala were forcibly converted to Mohammadism by circumcision & compelled to eat beef by Tipu. Similarly 1000s of Hindus of Kittoor were forcibly circumcised leading to 2000 Brahmin suicides. Every Hindu house in Palghat was forcibly converted.

Image
Image
Image
Malabar (Kerala) in particular bore the brunt of genocide & savage barbarism by Tipu. In his letters he instructed his officers to forcibly convert 12,000 Hindus, many of them Namboodris. In a later letter he exulted about forcing 4 Lakh Malabar Hindus to Mohammadism in Malabar

Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
May 25
The article by @AKanisetti is pure ahistorical trash. Desecrating Hindu temples to build a mosque at Qutub complex was NOT architectural reuse but Islamic BARBARISM. "Human figures" (aka Murtis) were not just defaced but excised brutally. Kirtimukhs & elephants were mutilated. 🧵



Image
Image
Image
Image
Everywhere in the "mosque", broken ruins of Hindu & Jain temples lie scattered like garbage. Muslims deliberately wanted to show contempt for Hindu symbols this way. The name "Quwwat ul Islam" itself means "Might of Islam" - clearly indicating it was built to trample over Hindus


Image
Image
Image
Image
Kanisetti makes a disgusting claim that the mosque was built to resemble a Garbha Griha. Half the plinth of the entire mosque was built on top of a Hindu temple's basement which was enlarged by haphazardly putting together the broken remains of 27 desecrated & mutilated temples!
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
May 20
Anpadh imbecile KRK - this is what happens when you learn history from Tawaifs of Bollywood.
Actual evidence shows that every Mughal king sent MILLIONS in looted money to Mecca/Medina while draining India's wealth & ensuring horrific famines starved Lakhs of Hindus in India.
🧵
A record of exact statistics on Mughal money sent to Mecca begins with Akbar in 1576 who sent Rs. 600,000 with costly gifts like 12,000 dresses of honor & extra cash for constructing a Khanqah. The average salary for a normal Indian at this time was just 3 rupees per month! Image
In 1577, Akbar sent Rs. 500,000 Rupees & 10,000 Khilats to distribute in Mecca. Another Rs. 100,000 & costly gifts for the Sharif of Mecca. In 1578, Rs. 400,000 were sent. Meanwhile desperate starving Indians turned to cannibalism while reeling from 2 huge famines under Akbar.
Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
May 8
In Feb. 1824, Ram Mohan Roy wrote a letter "Prospects of Christianity" to Harvard's Henry Ware where he recommended bribing "outcast" Hindus to convert & of his offer to send "as many" Hindus as possible to a Christian neighbor, to convert Hindus with a salary of Rs. 8 per month.
Image
Image
The letter titled "A Letter on the Prospects of Christianity & the means of promoting its reception in India" was a reply to Unitarian Christian preacher Rev. Henry Ware of Harvard who sent him a list of questions to work out a strategy on how Hindus of India could be converted. Image
Ram Mohan Roy discussed how Hindus were refusing to convert to Christianity & made recommendations to promote it. His suggestion was to establish English schools as a sneaky way to introduce Christian ideas so that the minds of Hindus could be prepared for eventual conversion. Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 28
One of the biggest myths is that Mughals invented the miniature school of painting in India. But Akbar under whose rule miniature "Mughal" painting supposedly developed had 17 eminent court artists - out of which a whopping 13 were Hindu, due to their superior artistic skills.
🧵

Image
Image
Image
Artists like Baswan, Lal, Daswanth, Kesu, Mukund, Haribans, Jagannath, etc. from castes like Kahar, Kayastha, Chitera, Silavat & Khati, show Hindus from all castes were the creators of the best "Mughal" miniature paintings, but the credit was given to Persians in Mughal courts.
Image
Image
It is said that Mughals like Akbar appointed Persian painters to teach Hindu artisans how to paint on paper, but even before Mughals entered India in the 1520s, the Malwa school was producing intricate miniature paper paintings of scenes from Bhagwat Puran & other Hindu epics.
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(