Late-stage pandemic response is hindered by how much the earlier stages were governed by panic, politics, and authoritarian urges. We'd be in better shape now if Americans had always been treated like rational adults capable of balancing cost and benefit, risk and reward.
Now, all of a sudden - solely and entirely because blue states where political and media elites live are experiencing huge Covid surges, and the incompetent Biden admin fell down on ordering test kits - we're talking about measuring the cost of restrictions against benefits.
Now that panic measures and authoritarian diktats have failed, and places where "sophisticated" people who "did everything right" are boiling over with new cases, suddenly it's time to ask if those protocols too harsh, if we should be counting hospitalizations instead of cases.
Suddenly we're ordered to forget everything the elite ever said about vaccines offering absolute protection against infection, making everyone who refused to take the shots into a super-spreading criminal who should be hounded out of society and barred from employment.
The sudden chatter about paying more attention to hospitalizations instead of infections is an example of shifting to rational risk/reward calculations instead of politicized hysteria. Remember, this all started with "15 days to flatten the curve," the curve meaning hospitals.
Reducing hospitalization and death was always a more rational and achievable goal than "zero Covid." It was never necessary to whip a population full of neurotics, hysterics, and aspiring petty tyrants into a frenzy over theatrical nonsense like masking.
The problem facing the elite today is that Omicron is the microscopic avatar of risk/reward calculations. It spreads quickly and nothing seems to stop it, but its effects are mild and vaccination reduces those effects to pretty much "bad cold" levels for most people.
If the longstanding regime of politicized panic, hysteria, and authoritarian OBEY OR BE PUNISHED psychosis is applied to the Omicron variant, it will destroy the country. We'll collapse in economic ruin and dissolve into civil war, blaming each other for the inexorable spread.
But if we treat Omicron as a situation to be managed with intelligent decisions about risk vs. reward, and approach sovereign American citizens as intelligent, sovereign people who can process good information and make those decisions for themselves, we can restore normal life.
There are signs the political elite are beginning to understand this, perhaps as the grim prognosis (from their point of view) from the next couple of elections settles on them, or because they realize the public is no longer willing to indulge a Laptop Class elite lifestyle.
We have to get better at remembering every action has a cost, and it must be measured against benefits, in both short and long terms. We must remember politicians always underestimate costs and exaggerate benefits, because they rarely pay a serious price for doing so. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

29 Dec 21
It's incredible that anyone still places absolute faith in the American political elite or assumes government "experts" are competent and impartial.

Some people desperately need to believe they're ruled by the best and brightest, despite all evidence to the contrary.
The quality of our political class and bureaucracy declined in tandem with the decline of faith in everything *but* the State. So much of our hunger for meaning, our deep need to *believe*, was redirected to the government, which grew steadily more arrogant and corrupt.
Now we have generations of people who simply cannot handle the idea that the Church of the State and its clergy - politicians, high officials, state-friendly media - are corrupt, incompetent, and unworthy of their trust. They're literally terrified to accept that obvious truth.
Read 16 tweets
21 Dec 21
Biden's handlers said getting the coronavirus under control would be simple. They said the only reason the pandemic was so bad in 2020 was Trump's poor leadership. Biden was going to shut down the virus, not the country.
Biden's record for Year One is in, and it's dismal. He's an utter failure by his own metrics and promises. Biden took many of the same steps as Trump, including a hilariously panicked reprise of the travel bans Biden denounced as mindless xenophobia, but he did everything WORSE.
Biden had the vaccines Trump successfully pushed to develop with astounding speed - and he's WORSE on the coronavirus. And Biden's alternately feeble and domineering "leadership" on the pandemic is tearing the country apart, bringing us to the edge of constitutional crisis.
Read 6 tweets
20 Dec 21
This is about Covid tribalism, the latest scheme to divide Americans into warring camps for the political profit of the Democrat party. They brought us to the brink of civil war by stoking class and racial resentment, and now they want us all to blame each other for Omicron.
The White House statement is a papal bull from the Church of the State, condemning the heretics and teaching the faithful to blame them for unleashing demons upon the flock. And of course it's crude blame-shifting from Biden's utter failure, measured by his own campaign promises.
In the longer term, obedience is a vital resource for statists, and they are using coronavirus panic to cultivate it. They want people to grow accustomed to obeying whimsical, ever-changing orders, to experience physical humiliation (masks for thee, but not for the elite.)
Read 5 tweets
15 Dec 21
Of all the systems mankind has devised to allocate scarce resources, capitalism is - by far - the best at increasing supply in response to demand.

The enforcers of every other ideology invest a great deal of effort into making people forget that simple, powerful truth.
Politics, ideology, economics - in the end, it boils down to figuring out who gets how much, because there will never be enough for everyone to have everything. Even if we had some magical technology that produced goods from thin air, our time would still be limited and valuable.
The cold, hard truth is that capitalism - private citizens owning capital and freely investing it to create profit - is the system most likely to increase the supply of scarce resources to meet demand. We have seen this demonstrated time and again since the Industrial Revolution.
Read 14 tweets
14 Dec 21
Has any political party in the world attacked its own country with the stamina and intensity of the Democrat Party after 2000? From unleashing crime on the streets and weaponizing the federal bureaucracy, to Joe Biden's all-out War on the Middle Class, they've been relentless.
Looking back, 2000 seems like a real turning point for Democrats. They had all kinds of bad ideas before that, and some of those ideas did a LOT of damage, but after 2000 the party grew increasingly and openly obsessed with punitive policies, destroying and rebuilding America.
Maybe it was the 2000 election itself and the bitter partisan hangover. Maybe it was cultural and political turmoil on the Left after 9/11, the ugly dawn of the "Why do they hate us so much?" chickens-coming-home-to-roost response to terrorism.
Read 12 tweets
2 Dec 21
Few cheap political hacks deserve to be hoist on the petard of their own rhetoric more than Joe Biden, so it's fun to see him called a racist for imposing "travel apartheid" on Africa, as the U.N. Secretary-General put it - but why should we treat travel bans as illogical?
We're told travel restrictions are nonsensical because "Omicron is already here" - but why is it unreasonable to restrict travel from places suffering major outbreaks, reducing the number of additional infections entering the country? What happened to "flattening the curve?"
What happened to "If it saves just one life?" Every case of this ostensibly super-dangerous variant prevented from infecting Americans is potentially saving lives. Total case numbers are constantly invoked as a crisis metric, so why not reduce cases with travel restrictions?
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(