Trinh Profile picture
Dec 31, 2021 25 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Ok, this is my last thread of 2021 & I'll talk about something that is MOST valuable in global exports - semiconductor - or chips, that powers the modern world. This is also very topical as we use it in our daily lives & at the center of politics & geopolitics given its shortages
In case you are wondering why we should know more about this most valuable global export item (worth about USD1trn & more valuable than oil), then we must not forget that in order for me to tweet this, we need chips. If we use the body analogy, chips = brain & oil is like blood.
Let's start with definition:
a) Semiconductor or in UN classification is known as cathode values & tubes & USD949bn was traded in global exports
b) It's a manufactured good & an INTERMEDIATE
c) U don't see it in the final product but products like CARS & laptops & mobiles need it Image
So the most valuable item in global trade is something you DON'T SEE as it is an intermediate product. You only see the final products such as cars/laptops/etc.

Chips are one of the US top exports (airplanes, oil, chips). China is a net importer of chips. Has a deficit of chips. Image
Meaning, money flows from China (USD350b) to chip exporters (North Asian countries like Taiwan (TSMC), South Korea (Samsung) & the US (Intel, Global Foundry). Let's talk about chips & its supply chain & why this is the US China trade-war & key to our national security (CHIPS ACT)
Chips were invented in the US & the US has 47% market share, Korea has 20% and Japan 10%, Europe 10%, & Taiwan 7%. China 5%.Now u may ask, well, why is the US fretting over chips if it DOMINATES. Because wants to retain the lead & this 47% includes design & manufacturing is less. Image
Before you say, "I'm so proud to be an American" and bask in your glory (well, I am rather proud), let's look at the value added by activity or supply chain of chips. And this is where the Biden administration (Trump before it) & Senator Warren are having issues: MANUFACTURING. Image
Let's put it a different way: American semiconductor firms are doing the R&D intensive part of the supply chain & they have OFFSHORED most of the manufacturing to Asia in various places in various segments of the supply chain, from Taiwan to Malaysia & Vietnam. India wants in too Image
Note that the US still remains MOST OF THE VALUE CHAIN but increasingly LESS. Consumes 25% of global semiconductor while China 24%, so the same. Europe about 20%.

So where's the beef? The issue is that we DON'T manufacture most of it in the US so have little control over supply. Image
I won't go into the R&D part of the US supply chain & go straight into the heart of the matter & why I quote Senator Warren's tweet, which I think is simplistic but sets the tone of the hour.

The USA lead in R&D but LAG in manufacturing. Who leads? Taiwan! Specially, TSMC. Image
To understand this chart, you need to understand a bit about chips but let me, a non engineer explain what this means: Foundries are where chips are manufactured. Manu of chips are capital intensive & very high tech. Basically u want smaller & faster chips & TW dominate < 10nm. Image
This chart shows u by region (basically we only have a few firms here so this is where Senator Warren goes off about too much concentration but the consolidation is necessary as it's EXPENSIVE to build a foundry).

TW & SK lead or TSMC & Samsung.
US has Intel + Global Foundry. Image
TSMC is ahead and DOMINATES <10nm & the US lags in this point. If u read the March 2021 US National Security Commission on AI paper, then it's all about the LACK OF MANUFACTURING in ADVANCED CHIPS that's a huge liability.

TMSC manus 54% of global chips.
nscai.gov/wp-content/upl… Image
Btw, the former CEO of Google is a key author of this report that calls for more support of US manufacturing of chips because it is the support from other governments that has allowed them to thrive.

Anyway, key pts are: we are good at R&D & bad at manu

nscai.gov/wp-content/upl…
Okay, let me wrap this up on why it matters to you, first, u use semiconductor as it is an input into electronics (the brain). U want a faster brain that is not too heavy right to help u with ur whatever tasks. Anyway, below is where the usage of chips is as a share of total. So? Image
Well, u know the SUPPLY of chips demand on INVESTMENT & it's capital intensive (at least 10bn for a decent foundry) & takes about 2 years. Plus we got Covid-19 related disruptions like Southeast Asia shutting down in Q3 2021.

Demand is HIGH & even acutely higher because Covid! Image
Note that I'm saying the following: we got supply that is relatively INELASTIC in the short-term for chips because of capacity constraints & time lag in investment & the fact we depend on TSMC for <10nm size. Second, operations were hit (remember my ASEAN note?) 3rd, demand high Image
Ok, so what happens now? First, the US will try to retain its lead. The Biden Administration has the CHIPS Act that has 52bn passed by the Senate waiting for the House to pass that gives incentives. Btw, @intel is basically the last American manu at the size that can compete. So?
Given that there is so much emphasis on getting US manu up to speed, one an reckon that more support will be lobbied by American firms, and specifically 2 left that manufacture & specially Intel to get it to the competitive level or the US won't have any (if can't compete, exit).
The US isn't the only country. EU has a similar strategy but the US has more to lose & what the supply shock crisis shows that we have too much concentration risk to East Asia & in some sector Southeast Asia for manufacturing in general & that means more diversification needed.
Arizona has emerged as a place where Intel is adding additional foundry (basically connecting to its existing). But TSMC is not silly. It is smart. It knows where the game is headed & building there too. So is Samsung.

In fact, TSMC also looking into the EU given policy shift.
Note that American firms such as Intel have a global footprint. Specifically, it has investment in Vietnam and just added USD7bn to Malaysia.

India just passed 10bn bill to attract semiconductor (it wants in too on the supply chain). Diversification will include ASEAN + India.
Hope I got u excited about semiconductor & know a bit more about the product that U DON'T SEE BUT SHAPE YOUR LIFE, CPI, INTEREST RATES, DOMESTIC POLITICS, GEOPOLITICS & geeky & cool at the same time.

And yes, I think the US SHOULD support the sector, both R&D & manufacturing.🙏
I have more too add but my threads always end up so long & let me end it by giving you the sources I used for this rant:

*Book: amazon.com/Fabless-Transf…
*The BBC video on semiconductor: bbc.com/reel/embed/p09…
*Policy paper: semiconductors.org/wp-content/upl…
*nscai.gov/wp-content/upl…

HNY!
Have a happy new year! This was my way of saying thank u for being with me on Twitter Land. No matter how good/bad life is, key in my opinion is to focus on learning & processing what we learned to understand more about our world & each other!

See u in 2022!

💃@Trinhnomics

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trinh

Trinh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Trinhnomics

Apr 1
At the Asia Society to listen to Asia’s view of Trump 2.0. Will share later ideas shared! Image
China:

Highly popular in China as he is entertaining as he has made China great again. His pressure has pushed China reforms forward. China has become more resilient and less reliant against the US. Chinese indigenous tech is decent & confidence domestically is highest ever. External pressure has rallied stakeholders around the central leadership for advancing tech & expanding domestic demand. Exports will not be a key driver & infra ROI down. China has benefited from Trump pressure.

Trump has a good story teller for China as Trump has helped the China story. The Chinese is projecting stability in a more volatile world & saying that China is open for business while the door is closing by the US.

DowJones & SPX down while China is up. Nasdaq down & HSI up. All thanks to Trump.
Middle East:

Everything Trump does in the Middle East is for Trump to focus to China. Trump puts on the table risky strategies. He wants to bully Iran to the table. Bombing Yemen is an example.

No one takes Trump seriously. What he says versus what he does. What he says is the maximum. Example is Palestine. The best strategy is to wait him out & Iran strategy is waiting him out & Iran has no leverage except time.

Time showed his hand of not having time. In a hurry.

People are convinced that Trump is going to collapse in six months. So give him something but not in a hurry to give him a good deal.

Considerations. Trump is willing to negotiate with Russian directly. He is willing to play outside US foreign policy. His handling of Zelenskyy is like a loan shark makes it difficult for Iranians to respond to him.

For Iranians, it is not what he tells them but what he does to others. For him to have wins quickly, he would have to pay the price.

He can’t give Iran what he wants with Israel. The Middle East problem won’t be solved easily.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 31
Trump "Liberation Day" is coming & if it is anything to go by like other tariff days, it won't feel "liberating." Why? Because he is front-loading bad news.

It sounds crazy but I have given it some thoughts and here are what I think his short-term objectives. Image
First, we know he has 20% tariffs on China on top of others so we are now got a lot of friction to trade with China, which the Trump administration sees as its #1 security threat.

But isn't happy with this friction to trade and investment and keen to close loop holes. Remember that Biden also increased tons of investment and tariff curbs with China.

How to close it is the question? It requires others to do it. Who are the others? The easiest is Mexico and Canada as they have USMCA, which Trump agreed in 2020 (previously NAFTA).Image
There are clues to what Trump wants from Canada and Mexico in the latest 25% AUTO tariff.

Why? There are exemptions to USMCA for US content and also the implementation of tariff is contingent on them figuring out how this 25% tariff is going to work.

Meaning, USMCA essentially is still in force but only exemptions in USMCA.

But Trump isn't happy w/ current USMCA. Wants change.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 27
I have a thread that I was going to make about auto tariffs but instead, I decided to just read/listen. The Peterson Institute has a good paper on modeling 25% tariff on the EU I am listening to this one by Paul Krugman because, well, he's a free trader and a great trade economist. And most importantly, he's old enough to have some historical perspective. Interesting to listen to him (I am a student of Fukuyama as well) because I think what's interesting is that people of his generation couldn't imagine the world we are in today in the 1980s when they recommended the policies they did.

tradetalkspodcast.com/podcast/206-pa…
If you don't like listening, here's the transcript: tradetalkspodcast.com/wp-content/upl…
So basically, Paul Krugman is a big free trader that thinks there is no reason for industrial policy (IP). Why? He thinks that we are not good at picking champions so just let trade be free.

Anyway, upon reflecting on 2025 vs 1987 when he was peak free trading, he sees a few mistakes of his free trade/total globalization idea:

1) Did not see strategic argument to trade, as in, if u free trade everything away, like the US and many countries have, and produce nothing, and the country that is dominant decides to INVADE, well, that's a vulnerability. In the 1980s, he spent ZERO time thinking about risks of free trade and was a free trade maximalist. Now he thinks that was arrogant (I said this not him - he wouldn't say that about himself) to perceive ZERO RISK.
2) Negative externality of globalization and the need to harness political capture for good will. Basically IP is needed to push a world in a certain place, which means, well, free trade got downside.
3) Downside of globalization is that industries are concentrated so losses are felt acutely in areas that lose jobs.

But he goes on to say free trade is best and IP is not good. Anyway and then he goes on to talk about virtues of IP. Haha!
Read 7 tweets
Mar 20
Let's go to the last part of the Miran's paper, which is currencies (Chapter 4 & 5).

Remember that his articulation of all the ills of the US trade imbalance is about the USD as a reserve currency & also the security support the US has to do (two burdens) that has grown, dwarfing the US economy RELATIVE size.

So let's talk about it. But before we even talk about, we have to go through a bit of economics history, if that is okay with you. We'll keep it pretty brief.
Triffin was a famous guy. He famously testified before Congress in 1959 & predicted the collapse of the Bretton Wood system, which happened in 1971 when the US broke away from the gold-dollar link.

What did he say? Well, simply, that as a gold-dollar reserve currency, the US would have to expand its liabilities as fast as required for global trade. But since it's backed by gold, which grows SLOWER than global trade, then we got a problem as lower rates would cause a run on the gold stock or dollar liabilities > gold stock.

And if the US didn't accumulate fast liabilities, well, global liquidity would shrink as US rates would go to high and cause global deflation.

If you want to learn more about it, see the paper below. The author btw isn't a fan of Triffin so says he got a bunch of stuff wrong and whatever he got right, it was probably not by design but accident.

Either way, he predicted that & got very famous obvs. What else did he predict?

bis.org/publ/work684.p…Image
Btw, the key reason the BIS author said Triffin was wrong/flukey is that dude didn't account for Euro dollar or USD outside the US (note at the time it was mostly Europe that held that hence the name & also the EUR was not even conceived although Charles de Gaulle was already pissed off about the dollar privilege & coined "exorbitant privilege phrase) so his timing of the "crash" was off. Either way, he was right for something and maybe it would have been different but either way, 1971, Nixon called the dollar-gold thing off.

Anyway, Triffin and went on to modify things because now we are no longer a USD-gold FX but just well, USD fiat currency.

So he now has a current account version of Triffin (btw, there's also a fiscal Triffin too). Let's talk about his current account idea.

He basically says this, well, as reserve FX or KING DOLLAR, the USD liquidity or USD liabilities will need to grow at the rate of global growth, which would lead to persistent current account DEFICIT.

Well, voila, the US did run since 1980s current account deficits (see graph from Miran's note).

Why? Well, it strengthens the USD and makes imports cheaper than exports + other countries' mercantilitic policy that makes them devalue their FX relative to their trade position.

BIS provides a bunch of counter arguments of why Triffin was off so read that but I won't summarize because, well, the point is to read the Miran paper and not why Triffin might be right for the wrong reasons.

Btw, the whole Triffin thing is about eventually, that things would become unsustainable.

But of course, BIS paper disagrees and say, well, FX would readjust and rates would adjust.Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Mar 19
Okay, let's talk about Trump end game. To do that, let's read Stephen Miran's "A User's Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System" together.

Note that there's a disclaimer that this is not a policy advocacy but catalog of tools available for them to "reshape the global trading system."
hudsonbaycapital.com/documents/FG/h…
Trump has been talking about global trade & how he thinks the US trade deficit is unfair since the 1980s (see his Oprah interviews) so this is beef he carries and he has the power to do it.

Trump 1.0 was a test case and Trump 2.0 is going to go full steroid on what he views as the current world order not working for the US. It may work for u, but not for him & his team is going to change it. Here's how Miran is laying it out.
First, the root of all US problems & its imbalances lies in the overvalued dollar. Yes, others lament its "exorbitant privilege" (a French FM said it) but here Trump team & also corroborated by many economists, including @michaelxpettis that while it is good for US FINANCIAL SECTORS, terrible for MAINSTREET. So basically Wall Street gains at the expense of the VACUUMING out of US industrial base.
Read 22 tweets
Mar 12
Emerging Asia Braces for Trade War Impact: Losers and Winners of Trumponomics

A thread. Let's go!

research.natixis.com/Site/en/public…
Let's start with the basics. What's on & what's promised/threatened. So far, on 12th March 2025, we have:
+25% on steel & aluminum on everyone (for steel, not new for everyone & just those that got exemptions. In Asia, that's AU, SK, and Japan. Canada & Mexico got exemptions and so did EU).
+20% on China, including Hong Kong.Image
Let's talk about the 20% on China. China is clearly targeted with 20% higher tariffs as well as its commercial ships, of which higher fees of docking in the US are being considered.

China will try to cope with higher tariffs as it did the past, which is offshoring productions to more neutral countries such as Mexico, Canada, Southeast Asia and sell more to the rest of the world as well as expanding relationships with the Global South (e.g. BRICS).

But with widening unilateral tariffs as well as others erecting barriers, this time around, beefing up domestic demand will be key.

Who loses in this tariff for Asia? China for US markets, but it will try to export elsewhere so there is a fear of a flood of Chinese goods coming.

Who gains? Well, it depends but those that can limit the flood of Chinese goods as well as export more to the US & attract investment. In other words, a lot of ifs but winners are possible.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(