Ok, this is my last thread of 2021 & I'll talk about something that is MOST valuable in global exports - semiconductor - or chips, that powers the modern world. This is also very topical as we use it in our daily lives & at the center of politics & geopolitics given its shortages
In case you are wondering why we should know more about this most valuable global export item (worth about USD1trn & more valuable than oil), then we must not forget that in order for me to tweet this, we need chips. If we use the body analogy, chips = brain & oil is like blood.
Let's start with definition:
a) Semiconductor or in UN classification is known as cathode values & tubes & USD949bn was traded in global exports
b) It's a manufactured good & an INTERMEDIATE
c) U don't see it in the final product but products like CARS & laptops & mobiles need it
So the most valuable item in global trade is something you DON'T SEE as it is an intermediate product. You only see the final products such as cars/laptops/etc.
Chips are one of the US top exports (airplanes, oil, chips). China is a net importer of chips. Has a deficit of chips.
Meaning, money flows from China (USD350b) to chip exporters (North Asian countries like Taiwan (TSMC), South Korea (Samsung) & the US (Intel, Global Foundry). Let's talk about chips & its supply chain & why this is the US China trade-war & key to our national security (CHIPS ACT)
Chips were invented in the US & the US has 47% market share, Korea has 20% and Japan 10%, Europe 10%, & Taiwan 7%. China 5%.Now u may ask, well, why is the US fretting over chips if it DOMINATES. Because wants to retain the lead & this 47% includes design & manufacturing is less.
Before you say, "I'm so proud to be an American" and bask in your glory (well, I am rather proud), let's look at the value added by activity or supply chain of chips. And this is where the Biden administration (Trump before it) & Senator Warren are having issues: MANUFACTURING.
Let's put it a different way: American semiconductor firms are doing the R&D intensive part of the supply chain & they have OFFSHORED most of the manufacturing to Asia in various places in various segments of the supply chain, from Taiwan to Malaysia & Vietnam. India wants in too
Note that the US still remains MOST OF THE VALUE CHAIN but increasingly LESS. Consumes 25% of global semiconductor while China 24%, so the same. Europe about 20%.
So where's the beef? The issue is that we DON'T manufacture most of it in the US so have little control over supply.
I won't go into the R&D part of the US supply chain & go straight into the heart of the matter & why I quote Senator Warren's tweet, which I think is simplistic but sets the tone of the hour.
The USA lead in R&D but LAG in manufacturing. Who leads? Taiwan! Specially, TSMC.
To understand this chart, you need to understand a bit about chips but let me, a non engineer explain what this means: Foundries are where chips are manufactured. Manu of chips are capital intensive & very high tech. Basically u want smaller & faster chips & TW dominate < 10nm.
This chart shows u by region (basically we only have a few firms here so this is where Senator Warren goes off about too much concentration but the consolidation is necessary as it's EXPENSIVE to build a foundry).
TW & SK lead or TSMC & Samsung.
US has Intel + Global Foundry.
TSMC is ahead and DOMINATES <10nm & the US lags in this point. If u read the March 2021 US National Security Commission on AI paper, then it's all about the LACK OF MANUFACTURING in ADVANCED CHIPS that's a huge liability.
Btw, the former CEO of Google is a key author of this report that calls for more support of US manufacturing of chips because it is the support from other governments that has allowed them to thrive.
Anyway, key pts are: we are good at R&D & bad at manu
Okay, let me wrap this up on why it matters to you, first, u use semiconductor as it is an input into electronics (the brain). U want a faster brain that is not too heavy right to help u with ur whatever tasks. Anyway, below is where the usage of chips is as a share of total. So?
Well, u know the SUPPLY of chips demand on INVESTMENT & it's capital intensive (at least 10bn for a decent foundry) & takes about 2 years. Plus we got Covid-19 related disruptions like Southeast Asia shutting down in Q3 2021.
Demand is HIGH & even acutely higher because Covid!
Note that I'm saying the following: we got supply that is relatively INELASTIC in the short-term for chips because of capacity constraints & time lag in investment & the fact we depend on TSMC for <10nm size. Second, operations were hit (remember my ASEAN note?) 3rd, demand high
Ok, so what happens now? First, the US will try to retain its lead. The Biden Administration has the CHIPS Act that has 52bn passed by the Senate waiting for the House to pass that gives incentives. Btw, @intel is basically the last American manu at the size that can compete. So?
Given that there is so much emphasis on getting US manu up to speed, one an reckon that more support will be lobbied by American firms, and specifically 2 left that manufacture & specially Intel to get it to the competitive level or the US won't have any (if can't compete, exit).
The US isn't the only country. EU has a similar strategy but the US has more to lose & what the supply shock crisis shows that we have too much concentration risk to East Asia & in some sector Southeast Asia for manufacturing in general & that means more diversification needed.
Arizona has emerged as a place where Intel is adding additional foundry (basically connecting to its existing). But TSMC is not silly. It is smart. It knows where the game is headed & building there too. So is Samsung.
In fact, TSMC also looking into the EU given policy shift.
Note that American firms such as Intel have a global footprint. Specifically, it has investment in Vietnam and just added USD7bn to Malaysia.
India just passed 10bn bill to attract semiconductor (it wants in too on the supply chain). Diversification will include ASEAN + India.
Hope I got u excited about semiconductor & know a bit more about the product that U DON'T SEE BUT SHAPE YOUR LIFE, CPI, INTEREST RATES, DOMESTIC POLITICS, GEOPOLITICS & geeky & cool at the same time.
And yes, I think the US SHOULD support the sector, both R&D & manufacturing.🙏
I have more too add but my threads always end up so long & let me end it by giving you the sources I used for this rant:
Have a happy new year! This was my way of saying thank u for being with me on Twitter Land. No matter how good/bad life is, key in my opinion is to focus on learning & processing what we learned to understand more about our world & each other!
I'm listening to Jonas Kaufmann thinking about tariffs and Asia. His voice is beautiful (we got tickets to see him 22 Feb - highly recommended). I'll do thread later on regarding tariffs etc but my bandwidth is limited lately given the admins.
Remember that US tariffs only matter for the 4.1trn that it imported from the world in 2024 - making it the biggest importer in the world or #1 customer.
Despite higher tariffs, the US has one of the lowest trade-weighted average tariffs in the world. What does that mean? If Trump wants & gets reciprocal tariffs, others will have to fall to US levels or the wall of protectionism rises to reciprocate others' wall of protectionism.
An example is the EU 10% tariff on auto for the US while the US has 2.5% on the EU auto.
So either the EU drops tariffs to 2.5% or the US can raise to 10% or pick at other items.
Meaning, it's the EU choice & rightly so to have 10% on the US, just like it's the US choice to do whatever it wants with goods coming from the EU.
The issue here of course is that the US is the largest importer of goods globally. There lies the headlines.
If you import almost nothing from the world and u raise tariffs, no one actually says you are protectionist because they gain nothing and lose nothing.
Who is good at dealing w/ the US? Look to Japan. They are the pros. They have an FTA & has been deploying tons of FDI to the US. Hence I think Japan will be unscathed.
Are tariffs the only trade barriers you can pose? Absolutely not. Non-tariff barriers are also huge barriers to global trade.
Anyway, talk soon! Don't get depressed by the headlines - they tend to make you think something is bigger than it is.
The news' job is to shock and awe. The reality is global markets are taking everything w/ stride because, well, much worse news was priced in.
And btw, Trump has higher approval ratings than his first term for the same honeymoon phase.
What does that tell you? Well, he's gonna keep going.
President Trump was inaugurated and the big question is to whom tariffs will be applied, not whether. Markets priced 8-9% tariffs on world before inauguration & so the dollar softened as he did not do this on Day 1.
But rest assure, it's coming. Let's talk about consequences through answering 3 key questions.
Ready?
First, I talked about tariffs here on this thread if you didn't read before () & this is a follow-up.
Question #1: Who is most vulnerable to Trump 10% tariff to the world in Asia?
First, I want to talk about a few ideas that was talked about in the previous thread on impact of tariffs.
One is of course tariff level. He says 10% higher so that's our assumption here. Second, elasticity of demand assumption, which I took as 4, which is basically from the literature and also from the Fed paper.
Anyway, to think about impact on GDP, you have to think how big of a trader they are anyway in terms of exports to the US.
Chart 3 shows you that exports to the US is the highest for Vietnam & lowest for Australia, Indonesia and India.
Chart 2 shows you that what is the manufacturing share of GDP an the highest is Taiwan, China, Thailand, Vietnam & Malaysia. Lowest is Australia and India.
Okay, yesterday, you had China rocking global trade with a USD1trn merchandise trade surplus, but by Friday (17th), we'll get news that China industrial profits are FALLING for a 3rd year in row.
What's going on? How does this work? And finally, what does it mean for the rest of the world?
Let's look at China industrial profits for 2024 from Jan to November.
It's down -4.5% & in 2023 it was down & in 2022 it was down.
Fine, but not all sectors experienced decline. These are the sectors with some profit: food manufacturing, textile, tobacco, furniture manufacturing, electricity, waste, and basically a few sectors kind of not that negative or flat - general equipment.
Sorry, meant to write a longer thread but had to go! Long story short, China is experiencing a balance sheet recession and with a few sectors growing so all that savings is being channeled to it.
That means reduced profits and which means to make more money it has to sell outward & thus that translates to profits being squeezed increasingly abroad too as it gains market share.
You can see that in the export data where exports grow but imports not so much. In Germany's case, it's losing out of both ability to export to China (Chinese imports of German stuff decline) & also China selling more of its goods in Germany.
But that is not all. The Germans are likely facing competition in third markets too.
And replace Germans with others like Japan, South Korea, and of course even not big traders like Indonesia.
So China's problem of weakening profits is global.
First, let's talk about the losers, as in DECLINE IN CHINA IMPORTS.
Germany saw imports from China decline by -10.7%, followed by France (-5.9%) and then Italy (-3.2%). Meaning, the Dutch still got something China want (ASLM chip making machine) but others saw decline of goods.
To add salt to injury, not only is Europe losing market share in China, Chinese goods have RISEN in Europe in nominal term or exports rose to 516bn.
But that's just Europe. It likely also lost out in other markets too, but the US. Europe gained US market share.
Who else lost out in LESS CHINESE IMPORTS (contraction in nominal term)??? Well, Thailand, which is a -5.2% contraction, Indonesia too! -4% (Chinese demand weak so commodity weak = less imports) And Japan -2.6% and also Australia -10% (Chinese demand weak so less demand for commodity etc)
And of course India at -3%. India is an interesting case because it loses in EXPORT TO CHINA BUT China has managed to export more and so India got a pretty large deficit with China at more than -100bn.
It is a beautiful day in HK. I’m at lunch, well, waiting for my bff at a wonderful Italian place called Cantina (next door was our wedding reception 5 yrs ago) & opened up my fav pink paper & the FT Big Read was Ursula choking Europe with regulations (she also chairs a paper that also supposed give her more money to deregulate). There lies the rub. Can u let the person who has led Europe down this rabbit hole be the person to lead it out of it? Some pics from my walk from home to lunch. Hong Kong 🇭🇰 is lovely, best time to visit is October, November & December.
“Inflexible EU rules set Europe’s car 🚗 industry for failure” says critics according to the paper.
“Conservatives & far-right lawmakers accuse the bloc’s ambitious green & digital agendas of punishing citizens & businesses.”
Interesting the definition of conservative & far-right. But irrespective, you can see the results.
She & Draghi chaired a report that says the EU is uncompetitive & too regulated & strangled. Behind.
Okay, but who has been in charge?
Not the conservative & far-right. Ursula has been in charge. All along.
So if we have to measure her performance with, well, outcome, then what is the score card? She said it herself in the report.
The RBI just cut the cash rate by 50bps and kept the policy rate on hold at 6.5% as slowing government spending and a weakening manufacturing sector is dragging down GDP growth.
This is my short thread on examining the India-Japan investment and trade relationship & why they haven't changed much in 10 years despite India being a big domestic demand market that Japan needs.
I argue that this is symptomatic of what is happening to Indian firms themselves. They find it hard to scale and leverage the labor endowments the country has.
How do we change this? Well, by changing the norms of thinking that the government needs to micro manage everything. It should set framework but let Indian private sector flourish.
Let's go.
First, what is the India Japan relationship? Well, it's getting better but remains SMALL relative to the ASEAN Japan (Vietnam Japan for example). Japan investment to India despite India being a huge domestic demand market that is super complementary to Japan weak demographic trends is at 4% of total. Look at ASEAN. Yes, at peak around 28% and settling about 24% of total.
India is a ginormous market. So why growing just from 2 to 4% of total???
Now let's look at Japan imports from India - it basically remains flat at a small level of 1% of total. Meanwhile, imports from China is 22% and ASEAN 15%.
So Japanese FDI to India has increased to 4% of total but imports remain small.
Basically this relationship remains small and has a lot of scope to grow.