Now it's winter wildfires in the US. How far do things have to go before governments recognise that crucial Earth systems might be reaching their tipping points? If so, we need to respond not with slow and steady carbon reduction plans, but with sudden and drastic action.
Otherwise, it's like announcing a plan, after Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008, to bail out the banks by 2050.
I'm going to keep saying this until it lodges:
If Earth systems are approaching their tipping points, current plans are far too little, far too late.
It's really hard to imagine what crossing a major Earth system threshold (a tipping point) would look like. But: 1. It will be orders of magnitude worse than anything we have ever experienced. 2. If one system tips, it could trigger a chain reaction, tipping other systems.
3. There's a term for such chain reactions: Mass Extinction Events. 4. If a system tips, there's no going back. This is because of a property of complex systems called hysteresis. More energy is required to push a system back into its prior state than was required to tip it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Happy New Year everyone. Here’s our 2022 to-do list: 1. End the pandemic ASAP, so we can get on with the other stuff. So:
a. Encourage hesitant friends to get vaccinated
b. Demand ventilation systems in schools and venues, public test and trace and a properly funded NHS.
Thread/
2. Demand a commensurate response to the climate and environmental crisis: ie a WWII-sized industrial transition and global mobilisation.
I think the most important component is a complete transformation of the global food system (Regenesis, out in May, seeks to map this).
3. Fight tooth and nail against the new authoritarianism, embodied in the UK’s Police Bill, that would ban effective forms of protest, while legislatively cleansing Gypsies, Roma and Travellers. Demand that Labour opposes it in the Lords (instead of abstaining, ffs).
Last night I watched #DontLookUp. It was like seeing my adult life flash past me.
Even down to the morning TV show where I totally lost it while trying, for the 1000th time, to explain what climate breakdown would do.
All the anger, the frustration, the desperation: I feel it.
I'm not proud of what happened on that show, but I'm not going to run away from it either. After 36 years of the most important of all issues being marginalised in favour of fatuous news about celebrities, it was bound to catch up with me.
The film got it dead right. The Great Wall of Denial erected by the media. Money and political games taking precedence over the survival of life on Earth, the endless trivial nonsense on our screens that sucks our brains out through our eyes. theguardian.com/environment/20…
I won't apologise for supporting Jeremy Corbyn. While he got some things wrong (as we all do), his policies offered us the best chance we've had in decades of escaping from the cage of neoliberalism.
I find it phenomenally depressing that, in almost-2022, so many people are asking "what's neoliberalism?" and see me as some pointy-headed loon for mentioning the word. It's the dominant ideology of the past 40 years, that now affects almost every aspect of your life.
It should be as familiar to us as communism was to the people of the Soviet Union. But the greatest success of this tremendously powerful ideology is its anonymity. And by heck, has it succeeded. theguardian.com/books/2016/apr…
I had a really interesting discussion with @matthewremski about the hazards of activism, navigating despair and keeping hope alive, while resisting the temptations offered by conspiracy theories, grandiosity and “aesthetic accelarationism”. Do listen. conspirituality.buzzsprout.com/1875696/975789…
We also explore the dark spiral of gleeful apocalypticism that led to this:
What I see in this and some previous statements by the same author is a liberating disregard for human life. If you believe the collapse of civilisation is inevitable, and our role is merely to observe it from a godlike height, you are not afflicted by certain troubling dilemmas.
How many more more accounts of dying patients saying "I wish I'd had the vaccine" will we have to read?
Those who make misleading claims about covid vaccines being dangerous or unnecessary, and persuade others that this is true, are killing people.
We recognise that there are limits to free speech: almost everyone agrees that we should not be free to shout “fire!” in a crowded theatre, because it is likely to kill people. Surely spreading false claims that discourage people from getting vaccinated is the equivalent?
I believe that, where there is an obvious conflict between them, it is right to strike a balance between free speech and the preservation of human life. I explore the question here: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I’ve seen some disturbing things in my time, but the howling silence in most of the UK media about the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, whose measures include stifling protest and legislative cleansing of Gypsies, Roma and Travellers, is close to the top of the list.
We’ve all had the fantasy, right? About what we'd do if politicians here attacked democracy, seized dictatorial powers and introduced special laws against minorities? How brave and noble we are in these dreams! Now it happens, and we clear our throats and look the other way.
If you ever wondered how dictators come to power, this is how: through resistance melting away like summer snow, as journalists and other public figures suddenly discover they're late for an urgent appointment about something-or-other. Sorry, must dash! Toodle-pip.