Will Storr's book describes how status games have evolved since we left small tribes and how we’ve gone from virtue games to prestige games. He unpacks the evolutionary role of gossip & how cancel culture scaled it. Informed this: eriktorenberg.substack.com/p/truth-status…
In contrast, Eumeswil's “anarch” makes a deliberate choice to formally comply while maintaining independence internally
The anarch believes that resistance is futile, & focuses on other projects where they can make a difference (e.g “It’s Time To Build”) amazon.com/Eumeswil-Ernst…
Given excitement around new innovations in democratic governance, it's good to read Nadia Eghbal's "Working in Public", which adds more nuance to the utopian stereotype that all open source projects are bottoms-up and democratically built/governed.
Democratic power rolls up to an oligarchy, bc the masses can't organize, only a minority elite can organize
This oligarchy gains its power by marrying itself, a small minority elite, w/ a permanent underclass, against the middle
Rob Henderson's "Luxury beliefs" is a model for understanding why some elites profess beliefs that run contrary to their actions (e.g. promoting public schools but putting their kids in private schools). Aristocrats who think aristocracy is evil.
Paul Bloom’s "Against Empathy" tries to make a nuanced case for balancing rationality & compassion (both of which can be weaponized)
One concern is whether we have the right antibodies for the weaponization of empathy, or the ability to properly scope it amazon.com/Against-Empath…
Burnham's trio:
1. The Machiavellians — about the structure of politics 2. The Managerial Revolution — about the 20th century 3. Suicide of the West — how liberalism works
Burnham was a Marxist in 1920s, then renounced communism & founded The National Review so he's seen it all
If these books seem heavy on political philosophy, it's b/c most of the remaining big questions around the future of the internet involve political philosophy!
On leadership, I enjoyed 1. ”Conscious Leadership” which is something like a mix of 7 Habits of Highly Effective People and Nonviolent Communication: amazon.com/15-Commitments…
Joan Didion passed away a few days ago, so it’s fitting to end with her tragic memoir about her husband and daughter, as well as this speech she wrote when she was 13 (!) h/t @KTmBoyle
Twitter is a social network where people often post when they're angry, snarky, curious, or self-promoting, among other triggers
Imagine a social network where people listened to music that made them feel relaxed or connected—and that was somehow native to the posting experience
or other iterations of social networks that would bring about better versions of ourselves by altering the environment or incentives
Yes also think campfires, listening sessions, late night philosophical conversations (clubhouse gets at some of this, but there could be text version too)
- Price is too high & rising
- Too much student debt
- Too many students dropping out
- Too many students underemployed
- Credential inflation
- Misaligned incentives on multiple levels
- Oligopolistic market dynamics prevent competition
TOO EXPENSIVE:
- Education costs have increased by 300% since 1980.
- Gov't spends 3% of GDP ($600B) subsidizing higher education.
- Incentives are misaligned such that the more gov't dispenses subsidies, the more expensive college gets.
TOO MUCH DEBT:
College debt is now ~$1.7 trillion (was $300B in 2000). Avg student is $40K in debt
Debt is now non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. If you don’t pay off loans by 65, gov't garners social security
Excessive debt leads ppl to delay having families and buying a house