Institutions ceased to be places for the *formation* of individuals
Instead they become platforms for *performance* where individuals are allowed to be their authentic selves precisely because they are able to give expression to who they are on the inside amazon.com/Rise-Triumph-M…
This idea of authenticity was novel
When Socrates said "Know thyself", he didn't mean it like we mean it today, where you should get in touch with your true self and self-actualize.
While it’s obvious the great things individualism has provided, for many, the single-minded quest for authenticity has turned out to be a disappointment, an endless hamster wheel
In a world of empathy-based ethics, the moral sense is ultimately the aesthetic sense. And that means that when the sacred order collapses, morality is simply a matter of taste, not truth.
There are no morals anymore, it's all taste/aesthetics/~vibes~.
Post-modernism combines our new Descartes-ism "I feel, therefore it's true" with the power principle: knowledge is a function of power ("who holds power, makes truth") and that the person or group who has less power thus has a moral claim to truth.
Caldwell's main reason for the culture wars is that we have two irreconcilable constitutions, and our country is split over which constitution they subscribe to, the one of 1789 or 1964
The Spanish Civil War might be a good analogue for where we are today, where all the radical ideas on the left and the right were fresh, and there was massive infighting on both sides, even more hatred towards the in-group adjacent than the out-group
Mearsheimer traces how, post-cold war, the U.S moved from an Offensive Realism strategy (protect U.S interests at all costs) to a Liberal Hegemony strategy (promote liberal democracies globally at all costs)
"It's been too long. We're family. But Howard couldn't do this when he was sixteen and he couldn't do it now. He just did not believe, as his father did, that time is how you spend your love."
Found a new favorite philosophy podcast, went to look up where the host did his PhD, & instead found this.
I'm endlessly inspired by the idea that people can gain world-class expertise w/o needing approval from traditional gatekeepers, & by the sheer force of will to get there.
I'm also inspired knowing that there are so many people out there doing jobs that don't fully harness their unique skillsets, and that with just a bit of community or capital or mentorship they could, like Steven, instead be doing what they're best suited to do.
Some takeaways from conversations w/ @jasoncrawford, @ArtirKel, and @Ben_Reinhardt on progress, particularly on how 1) funding models, 2) regulation, and 3) culture influence progress 👇
1- Funding Models:
There are a lot of different funding models (NIH grants, DARPA...)
A lot of research is done in universities, yet it's a relatively new phenomenon.
There was a golden era for corporate research w/ Bell Labs & Xerox, but then & gov't stepped in.
The US famously doesn't have a national coordinated innovation policy.
In some ways this is a good thing, since means there is more diversity of thought and funding, more opportunities for someone to say "yes" to scientists and fund their projects.
- Made friends via guests (e.g. Tyler Cowen) but also via listeners. It’s a way to find all the other people like you out there.
- Learned a lot. Each podcast is a forcing function to learn enough about a topic to not look dumb.
You should start a podcast if:
- you want to build a strong network and/or showcase your strong network
- you want to build expertise and/or showcase your expertise
- you want to promote a specific topic or way of thinking
- you’re insatiably curious