A short REPORTING thread on New Year’s Eve: Amazon’s Employment Contract & Code of Conduct. One rule for the executives & one for everyone else. 🧵 /1
In a verified, federal complaint - under oath - Amazon sued my husband for breaching this 5-page version of its employment contract. You can read the whole thing here: bit.ly/32SowgM /2
But my husband had only ever signed THIS, 9 page version. It's ENTIRELY different. Go ahead, read it here: bit.ly/3zgQTBu /3
Can you imagine being sued in federal court for a contract you never signed? And being forced to pay for motions to get the suing party to amend? (Let alone the fact of being sued in VA when Amazon required you agree to Washington for any lawsuits...). That happened here. /4
Anyway, Carl’s contract explicitly allows him to - while employed at Amazon - start a business and “solicit and accept investment capital” from anyone *other than* an investor or prospective investor in Amazon. This is Section 3(c)(i). /5
Amazon’s support for such entrepreneurial activity emphasized later in Carl’s contract where Amazon says employees own all time & attention to the company BUT: “without limiting the provisions of Section 3.” (The start your own company & seek investment section!) /6
The company at issue is Allcore. Remember that? The one Carl told Amazon about & through which he was pitching business before Amazon alleged it was all a crime? Amazon doesn’t even require in its contract that Carl tell them about any new company. /7
What would have happened if Amazon had asked Carl about any of this instead of going to the FBI? Carl has asked to speak with Amazon multiple times since the FBI came & every time he is told some variation of “Amazon will only talk to him if he’s pleading guilty to a crime.” /8
Also, Amazon told us in this filing that they NEVER gave the FBI Carl’s employment contract. So, what was the basis for the FBI to say anything was a crime? Amazon’s word? Is that … all it takes? That’s terribly scary for employees across America if it's true. /9
Because, look, Amazon has ALL of the property it complains is a felony crime. And! It doesn’t allege it overpaid in rent for the data centers, the only $ it ever owed. So, does any of this make sense? /10 bloom.bg/3HqdMVP
Now, Amazon argues in its complaints that Carl also breached a contract via their allegation he breached Amazon’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. /11
But wait! The code is part of Amazon’s “Owner’s Manual & Guide to Employment.” In New Jersey federal court, Amazon said: The “Manual states unequivocally that ‘[it] is not intended as a contract’” & plaintiff couldn't have believed it "creates a legally binding contract.” /12
You know Amazon: Bend the rules for whatever they need! In Amazon’s world where they can pay 1000s an hour for a lawyer. Carl’s employment contract is CRYSTAL clear: The employment contract is the whole ball game. /13
Amazon COULD have incorporated their code into their employment contract. Look, Microsoft incorporated its “conflicting interest” provisions INTO their contract. Amazon does NOT. /14
The crazy thing about Amazon’s code of conduct is that it doesn’t even PROHIBIT conflicts of interest! It embraces them so long as they are in Amazon’s “best interest.” /15
Of course it does, because: Founder @JeffBezos owns multiple outside companies that did business with Amazon like @wapo & @blueorigin. And both of those companies use @awscloud as their cloud provider. /16
Heck, Jeff’s girlfriend’s company Black Ops Aviation even did business with Jeff's company! 20 MILLION! And scrapped in the can! /17
And @ajassy bought a hockey team - the @SeattleKraken - while employed at Amazon. And then, after! For the first time ever, Amazon bought a pro stadium! Coincidentally, I guess, it was the Kraken’s BILLION $$ stadium. /18
And so: I guess that’s all okay, the Amazon execs doing business with Amazon for personal gain. But my husband should go to prison for Amazon's allegations. That’s literally what Amazon is lobbying the government to do. That's a wrap on today's report. /19
@threadreaderapp please unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Amy Sterner Nelson

Amy Sterner Nelson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Amy_K_Nelson

30 Dec 21
REPORT: Today is pretty “legal” but it’s super interesting. Amazon tells the court they paid to build data centers to get an injunction against a defendant. They didn’t. So they slid unnoticed edits into their proposed order. Look at the magic here. /1 bit.ly/31aSRqe
Northstar partnered with Zuckerberg’s IPI to build 9 buildings for Amazon to lease. IPI owned 86% of the buildings, Northstar 14%. Amazon owned no %. It’s a tenant, like a tenant in an apartment building. Northstar & IPI formed a joint venture & paid to build the buildings. /2
Amazon was only ever responsible for monthly rent. Like you pay apartment rent. Obviously, they didn’t pay to build the buildings. Why would you pay to build an apartment and then pay someone to lease the apartment you owned/built? You wouldn’t. /3
Read 29 tweets
30 Dec 21
Amazon's new motion in its lawsuit - filed only after the lobbied DOJ to charge my husband with a crime - accuses him of "publicizing a 'David and Goliath' narrative and chasing news." They're spending MILLIONS in legal fees. Do they expect him to not fight for his freedom? /1
They say he hasn't produced a "shred of exculaptory evidence." Um, Amazon somehow staved off discovery in the Virginia "rocket docket" for 21 months. My husband will produce documents in 2 weeks per the schedule. /2
And, for the first time, Amazon will have to produce evidence to back up its 4 verified, under oath complaints. For 2 years, they've publicly shamed people without any duty to provide evidence. /3
Read 7 tweets
29 Dec 21
REPORT: Today’s thread is about Amazon’s reliance on secret recordings made by Kyle Ramstetter, who they allege swindled them out of $17 million but who they have mysteriously left alone. And: Proof of manipulation of the secret recording. You can't make this up. /1
Kyle worked at Northstar. But in February 2019, he independently took a piece of land under contract from Virginia land baron Chuck Kuhn. The government revealed this fact in a civil forfeiture complaint. /2
Land is a funny thing. If you have it under contract - the right to buy it - you control it. The owner can’t sell it to anyone else. You could think of it like when you have a house under escrow. The owner can’t sell the house to someone else. /3 bit.ly/3EAi7DR
Read 30 tweets
28 Dec 21
Reporting: Another really remarkable accusation by Amazon - and another way Amazon partnered with a billionaire while working hard to get the government to charge my husband with a felony. This one involves *Ross Perot* - remember him?? /1
After my husband left Amazon, the company sought to work with him on real estate development. Many emails show this!! I’m not sharing them here because - while they are Carl’s post-employment emails, not Amazon’s - I’m afraid of their lawyers. /2
By 3/20, Carl found great land in Tennessee for a fulfillment center. He paid for diligence & test fits for a warehouse & more. He sent it to Todd Meldahl, a KBC broker with an Amazon email address. (More on KBC & their $$ partnership with Amazon.) /3 bit.ly/3mGyGYL
Read 10 tweets
27 Dec 21
Reporting: Amazon & IPI (a spinoff of Iconiq - Zuckerberg, @jack, & Reid Hoffman’s fund) have a neat legal trick, using federal law enforcement & public storytelling. Step 1: Accuse people of a crime to the FBI. A thread. /1 bit.ly/345o7s1
(Bonus points if company destroys documents in 30 days, so they can whatever story. As @JeffBezos says: ''I love E-mail. The problem is somebody can take it out of context and use it against you, and we have to guard against that.'' /2 nyti.ms/3HjH88n
Step 2: When there isn’t an indictment, sue the people you accused. Step 3: In complaints, mention the FBI investigation that YOU started 114 times. (114!) But do NOT say that you made the accusations & provided selective evidence. /3 bit.ly/3zakEUs
Read 18 tweets
18 Feb 20
To my working women friends: If you could give your younger working self any advice, what would you say?
@TaylorLorenz ... thought you'd like this thread.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(