In 2022, let us build a political movement capable of dismantling the fossil fuel system and ensuring a just transition for all.
Btw, a just transition must be attentive to global inequality. Rich countries have disproportionately caused this crisis, and have wildly excessive levels of energy use. A just approach means they must reach zero emissions much faster than 2050 (which is a global average target).
This is crucial to give poorer countries more time, and to ensure everyone has energy sufficient for decent living. And that means ending the net appropriation of Southern resources by Northern states and firms, so they can be used instead to meet local human needs.
We also need a strong commitment on reparations for climate damages that have been inflicted on the global South. And this should include technology transfers and patent waivers to facilitate the fastest and smoothest possible energy transition in all countries.
Fossil fuel lobbyists have taken to claiming that climate action is intrinsically anti-poor. This is false. What is anti-poor is to attempt to address the climate crisis without addressing inequality. And this is why are relentless in our call for climate justice.
In fact, much of the South needs to increase energy use to meet basic needs: clean cooking, good housing, cooling, transport, computing, etc. This is 100% compatible with staying under 1.5C, but it requires dramatic cuts in excess energy use of the rich. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Ensuring good lives for all is not an obstacle to climate action. The obstacle is capital accumulation and elite consumption. nature.com/articles/s4146…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm excited to announce the latest release of the Sustainable Development Index, now with data through 2019. Costa Rica tops the list! sustainabledevelopmentindex.org
Rich countries continue to perform poorly, with dangerously high levels of resource use and emissions. Sadly the Nordic countries also fall toward the bottom. aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/…
Middle-income countries that have strong public provisioning systems (specifically for healthcare and education) tend to perform best. This model allows countries to deliver relatively high levels of human welfare with relatively low levels of resource use.
As the US "Summit for Democracy" continues today, it's worth remembering how the US has actively destroyed democracies across much of the global South over the past several decades, while propping up authoritarian regimes. Here are a few prominent examples:
In 1953, the US worked with Britain to orchestrate a coup that deposed Mohammed Mosaddegh, the elected Prime Minister of Iran, and in his place propped up the authoritarian regime of Reza Shah. Remember Mosaddegh:
In 1954, the US orchestrated a coup to depose Jacobo Árbenz, the democratically elected leader of Guatemala, and installed the military dictator Carlos Castillo Armas in his place. Remember Árbenz:
I'm excited to announce this new paper we have out in Nature Sustainability. We track countries' performance on social and ecological indicators (the doughnut!) from 1992 to 2015. With the brilliant @AndrewLFanning, @DrDanONeill and @Nicolas43513211. nature.com/articles/s4189…
Here are some of the key findings:
1. No country has managed to achieve minimum social thresholds while remaining within planetary boundaries over the period analyzed. But a few do come close, with Costa Rica leading the way.
2. Social gains have been slow and insufficient even while resource use has exploded.
This is what happens when you have an economic system that is organized around capital accumulation and elite consumption rather than around meeting human needs.
This is one of the most important books I've read this year. I've been researching and writing about capitalism and imperialism for my whole career, and I learned something from every page. It's a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the world economy.
The Patnaiks argue that capital accumulation in the global North *requires* an imperialist arrangement with the global South, not as a bug but as a feature. This helps explain several turns in global economic history that economists have otherwise struggled to understand.
The book also includes a chapter that updates Utsa Patnaik's research on the British colonial drain from India, which I had reported on here. New data puts the total figure at $66 trillion. aljazeera.com/opinions/2018/…
I had the honour of reading an advance copy of David Graeber and @DavidWengrow’s new book “The Dawn of Everything”. It is masterful and exhilarating – a much-needed update to our story of human civilization. It is also politically liberating:
For ages we have been told that if we want to create an egalitarian society the only option is to wind back time and return to living in small forager bands. After all, hierarchy emerged with the rise of complex societies. It is a necessary feature of civilization. Right?
Not so. Graeber and Wengrow show that human history is full of complex, multicultural societies – even cities with big public works – that show no evidence of kings and palaces and coercive power.
What does the World Bank's lead climate economist think about degrowth and post-capitalism? We did a written debate in the pages of Development Policy Review. You can read it for free here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dp…
Some of my arguments:
1. Growth in high-income nations is driving ecological breakdown
2. Hoping for “green growth” is not a reasonable response. We need to be scientific about this.
3. Rich countries must adopt post-growth pathways
4. Development requires decolonization
5. Social value and provisioning can be increased without rising commodity production
6. The key is to decommodify and expand essential social goods
7. The Environmental Kuznets Curve will not save us