@HertsPolice
Have been promoting their special constables including Cherry seen here with sparkly green nails, jewellery and an unusual amount of makeup for a police officer
I posted about it with a link to their uniform policy
Herts police deleted the original post as can be seen here
I also posted this one. Red nails. Even more alarming amount of make up
Discussion ensued - some serious, some funny, but all with the same basic point: does Herts police allow some of its officers to break some of the rules some of the time?
Herts police responded that derogatory comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted
I posted that Herts police can't actually delete people's tweets ...🙄
They deleted their tweet
Herts police replaced the tweet with with one saying derogatory tweets will be reported (to whom..? 🤷♀️)
More discussion ensued. Including @WeAreFairCop reminding then about the recent judgment in Miller v College of Police
Herts Police deleted that tweet
Qs:
- What is HP culture of safeguarding & anti-corruption like if it allows officers to flout rules?
- Are officers who raise issue internally told comments are "derogatory" & "won't be tolerated"?
- Why is HP social media run by people who think they can constrain legal speech?
I gave evidence in the Sandie Peggie case because the hospital board & male Dr refused to accept as findings of fact that that men are more likely to commit violent & sexual crimes, that men are more dangerous to women, so women are more heavily impacted by men in their spaces than vice versa.
You can read my witness statement here.
These are the facts it attests to.
You don't need a degree of any sort to understand these facts.
I've written to @stonewalluk CEO Simon Blake applauding his leadership in discarding Stonewall's previous extreme and divisive definition of "transphobia".
And explaining the damage that it did.
It's not good enough to quietly back away from it after doubling down for so long
It said that Stonewall's guidance was in line with the Equality Act 🤨
The government's @oeogovuk has recently admitted it is a clear misinterpretation of the law to suggest that the Equality Act requires allowing people to access opposite sex facilities because they have the protected characteristic of "gender reassignment" gov.uk/government/pub…
15 months after calling me in for questioning about a tweet, and having sat on the CPS decision that there was no crime for 2 months, the Met bothered to call me up at 7pm this evening to tell me, and then put out this press statement. 🙄
#TheProcessIsThePunishment
Here is the tweet over which they wasted their time, my time, my lawyers time and taxpayers' money.
Minister for Women & Equalities says "We are proud of the EqAct & the rights & protections it affords women. The Govt does not plan to amend legal definitions in the act.”
Hundreds of women are going to Parliament on Wednesday to ask the govt to rethink.
It took 22 more years before 1919 the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act was passed permitting women to become join professions and to become lawyers and civil servants and to sit on juries.