Happy New Year #MathTwitter! Let's start 2022 w/ Part 1 of a fun series: "Groups you Never Knew Existed...and others you can't POSSIBLY live without!"
Today we'll see the "diquaternions", a term you've never heard of b/c I made it up last month. Let's dig in! 🧵👇
1/17
We'll start with the familiar quaternion group Q_8. Shown here are several Cayley diagrams, a Cayley table, cycle diagram, subgroup lattice, its partition by conjugacy classes, and an action diagram of Aut(Q_8). Each of these highlights different structural features.
2/17
Next, have you ever wondered what would happen if you replace i=e^{2\pi i/4} in Q_8 with a larger root of unity?
These are the dicyclic groups. Here is Dic_6, for n=6. Note that n=4 gives Q_8.
The last two pictures highlight the orbit structure (cyclic subgroups).
3/17
The quotient Dic_n / <-1> is always dihedral. Here are several ways to see that.
Even though these groups generalize Q_8, when n is a power of two, Dic_n is called a "Generalized Quaternion Group", because it shares properties with Q_8 that other dicyclic groups don't.
4/17
In particular, "gen. quaternion groups" never break up as a semi-direct product of any proper subgroups, because every non-trivial subgroup contains -1. So no two can intersect trivially.
Here are the subgroup lattices of Q_{32}, Q_{16}, and Q_8. Compare to Dic_6, above.
5/17
Now, let's talk 2x2 representations of these groups.
There is a canonical way (see images) to represent
So, dicyclic groups are what we get by replacing R_4 with R_n in Q_8.
But there's something else we can do: start with the QUATERNION group Q_8 and add the *reflection* matrix F from the DIHEDRAL group D_n!
This defines the "DIQUATERNION group", DQ_8.
7/17
You've never heard the term "diquaternion" because I coined it 2 weeks ago. It consists of the matrices
DQ_8 = { ±I, ±X, ±Y, ±Z, ±iI, ±iX, ±iY, ±iZ},
where X, Y, Z are the "Pauli matrices" from quantum physics.
This is also called the "Pauli group on 1 qubit".
8/17
Fun exercise, good for students: show that the quotient DQ_8 / <-I> is Z2^3, by making a Cayley table with the following 8 entries:
±I, ±X, ±Y, ±Z, ±iI, ±iX, ±iY, ±iZ,
like we did with Q_8 and Dic_6 in tweets 2 & 4.
Show that it has the structure of this.
9/17
Another fun exercise for your algebra students:
Label the following cycle diagram with elements from the diquaternion group DQ_8. This will help see different aspects of its structure. It has 4 max'l orbits of size-4, and 5 of size 2.
10/17
Purely visually, we can find three index-2 subgroups H of DQ_8, isomorphic to
D_4 (the outer ring)
Q_8 (yellow nodes)
C4 x C2 (nodes along the x & y axes).
Another fun exercise for your students: for which of these H does DQ_8 ≅ H ⋊ C2?
11/17
Do you see what's coming next? What if we replace "R_4" in the rep. for DQ_8 with a different rotation R_n, like we did to generalize Q_8 --> Dic_n.
For n=2^k, this defines the "Generalized Diquaternion Group". Here is DQ_{16}.
12/17
There are Pauli groups on n qubits, formed by tensoring, but these have order 4^{n+1}. So the first 4 have sizes 16, 64, 256, 1024. In contrast, there's a diquaternion group for every power of 2 bigger than 8.
13/17
These groups belong in any ugrad algebra class! It's skipped b/c without visuals, it really hard to motivate. Who *really* understands it from the following presentation:
If you want to use graphics like this in your next algebra class, get in touch! There is so much more milage you get by doing things visually, and it really hammers home the inherent BEAUTY in math, that your students will never forget!
And I promise, it's SO MUCH FUN!
16/17
I've got lots of materials to share. I'm also finishing a ~600 page book, that I'm hoping will completely change how algebra is taught. My materials (slides, HW, videos) will always be freely available. But there's no going back!
Here's to a great 2022, Happy Near Year!
17/17
UPDATE & CORRECTION: On #10/17, I had a blank cycle diagram that was for the wrong group, V4⋊C4. It has the same # of elts of each order as DQ_8, but is not isomorphic.
I just made these diagrams. 2 different ways to label DQ_8: one w/ Pauli matrices, and the other...
18/17
...with the elements of <R,S,F>, where Q_8=<R,S> and D_n = <R_n, F>.
Here are their cycle diagrams w/ the same labelings. The yellow nodes highlight the subgroup Q_8.
I found this informative, it's something I simply had never done until just now. Hope you enjoy!
19/17
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now that my #VisualAlgebra class is in the books, I want to post a long "meta thread" of all 16 weekly threads, with daily summaries. Here's my entire class, including lectures, HW, & exams, in one convenient place.
And stayed tuned for some surprise announcements below!👇🧵
We started #Week1 of #VisualAlgebra with a few quotes from "A Mathematician's Apology" on the beauty of mathematics, and then saw Cayley diagrams for the symmetries of the rectangle and triangle.
In #Week2 of #VisualAlgebra, we explored the Rubik's cube, more Cayley diagrams, group presentations, the impossibility of the word & halting problems, and we classified all frieze groups.
I woke up a few days ago with the sobering realization: actually, I do NOT really understand groups actions.
Spoiler: I do now, but it took some work. And now I realize how incomplete my understanding was. 😳
Let me explain, I think some of you might enjoy this!
1/12 🧵👇
See those "orbit diagrams" above? I got to thinking: "how can we characterize all possible diagrams?" Equivalently, all transitive actions of D_4 (or a group G in general).
Playing around with things, I came up with a few more. But I still didn't know the answer. Do you?
2/12
For example, how many of the following are possible?
Before reading on, see if you can answer this, and generalize to arbitrary groups.
There's a simple elegant answer, that I was never aware of. And I suspect that the majority of people who teach algebra aren't either.
Finishing up our🧵👇 #VisualAlgebra class in #Week15 with divisibility and factorization. I'm a little short on visuals, but here are two really nice ones on what we'll be covering, made by @linguanumerate.
Henceforth, we'll assume that R is an integral domain.
1/8 Mon
The integers have nice properties that we usually take for granted:
--multiplication commutes
--there aren't zero divisors
--every nonzero number can be factored into primes
--any 2 nonzero numbers have a unique gcd and lcm
--the Euclidean algorithm can compute these
2/8 M
Some, but not all of these hold in general integral domains. This is what we'd like understand!
If b=ac, we say "a divides b", or "b is a multiple of a".
If a | b and b | a, they're "associates", written a~b.
We started #Week11 of #VisualAlgebra with a new diagram of one of the isomorphism theorems. I made this over spring break. The concept is due to Douglas Hofstadter (author of "Gödel, Escher, Bach"), who calls this a "pizza diagram".
1/14 Mon 🧵👇
Though we constructed semidirect products visually last week, we haven't yet seen the algebraic definition. On Friday, we saw inner automorphisms, which was the last step we needed.
Recall the analogy for A⋊B:
A = automorphism, B = "balloon".
2/14 M
Next, we asked when a group G is isomorphic to a direct product or semidirect product of its subgroups, N & H.
Here are two examples of groups that we are very familiar with.
Here are two ways to think about it. One involves cosets as "boxes" in a grid, and the other is in terms of the subgroup lattice: to find the index [H:K], just take the product of the edges b/w them.
1/8 Mon
Pause for a quick comment about cosets in additive groups. Don't forget to write a+H, rather than aH. Here's a nice way to see the equality of a left coset and a right coset.
2/8 M
Next, we proved that if [G:H]=2, then H is normal. Here's a "picture proof": one left (resp., right) coset is H, and the other is G-H.
WEEK 2 of #VisualAlgebra! This is only Lecture #2 of the class.
Monday was MLK Day, but on Wed, we learned about the Rubik's cube! I got to show up my rare signed cube with Ernő Rubik himself from 2010! Did a shout out to @cubes_art's amazing talents.
1/8 W
We learned some neat facts about the Rubik's cube, like how the group has just 6 generators, but 4.3 x 10^{19} elements, and a Cayley diagram with diameter of 20 or 26, depending on whether you count a 180 degree twists as 1 or 2 moves.
2/8 W
I showed 3 different groups of order 8, and asked if any are isomorphic. At this point, all they know about what that means is that two groups must have identical Cayley diagrams *for some generating set*.