Now obviously I agree that this creates a conflict. I’ve known many a female cop who would never have the red carpet rolled out like this.
Also, the Police Comms team desperately trying to look inclusive and cool is hilarious. They shouldn’t be using their staff as props.
But they should also know that this would occur. I do not agree with the mocking of this cop’s appearance and I don’t know their story. But the conflict still exists even if the mean girls and trolls aren’t being nice.
My first impression was:
Why on earth are the Police’s Comms team exploiting their staff in this manner?
Where are the senior Comms people? Why are they so sloppy?
Again as valid as the questions are about nail polish and exceptions (I think that can be easily answered if you engage with the issue in good faith)… but why are Comms teams allowed to do this to the officer and the obviously junior (and very silly) social media people?
This is the big problem with the culture wars and content factory in general is that around and behind every single one of these posts and ratios and bans and “the algorithm” - is people appearing in and managing and moderating “content”.
Who is sticking up for them?
Who is asking if it is appropriate for the enforcement arm of government to use employees in this manner, in ridiculous rainbow washing, exposing them both to all this “content”?
What? So the Police look friendly during this time of authoritarian overreach?
NOT saying anyone was threatening. Saying in general that living this day in day out is really bad for mental health. I’ve been in this game for a very long time and there’s not much I haven’t seen, and even I get bloody worn out. And I’m not a 25 yo marketing and Comms grad.
Again this comes back to everyone completely ignoring their own contribution when it’s convenient. It’s one of my biggest gripes with GC - the swarm showing up is incredibly hostile and unpleasant even if individually it’s harmless and they’ve got a point.
It’s why I don’t involve myself anymore because I reflected on how it is for the people that have to deal with these childish pile ons from - ironically- women claiming to defend women with no thought for the young women on the receiving end.
For me, it’s skews mostly on the direction of grown ass women making the lives of young women with no power bloody stressful with no regard for their well-being or welfare.
And it upsets me that they laugh whilst doing it.
Nobody ever considers how this stuff is made.
I got into this business to make people’s lives easier and better and to provide opportunity.
Not to make daily life a living hell for juniors in an invisible, unappreciated, underpaid job.
When I say that even if you have a point, your conduct matters too… this is what I mean.
And this is why social media moderation is so heavily weighted on use of reply functions.
But none of them will ever listen. I’ve tried. Let’s make it about the nail polish.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Desperately want to talk about the mass formation psychosis stuff (I already knew about it, and have been warning about it in so many words for some time), but I know what's good for me. As for whether this is another bullshit twisting by the far right, I have concerns... but...
So, this has played out very much like I expected.
The far right disinformation propaganda/radicalisation networks use SEO effectively as part of their strategy. So they make sure they are the source when people Google. It's like whack-a-mole there.
Now, one thing the right does is take a niche concept and create checklists that feed confirmation bias. I have had things I said to people in that network taken and used in that way. But the thing is they both do it. You need to look at the tactics.
She has a name. She has expertise. She thinks you should get better sources than James Lindsay, who is promoting the same old red scare nonsense from the 1960s. lol
Is there anything more tedious than pseudointellectual culture wars bros quoting Lindsay at women who know better?
It’s always nice to know that a random dude quoting a person outside the Humanities who purposely leaves parts out due to his funding is still considered more authoritative than a “she” who knows what she’s talking about.
We are arguing this from the wrong angle - those who love censorship don't care about the civil liberties of their enemy. That is how outgrouping works.
It's like spanking of kids. You can't proselytize it.
It simply doesn't work.
The problem with the radicalisation funnels is that they already have this stuff built in.
You are the victim
You are under attack
THEY are powerful
THEY will censor you
So when you censor it, what happens?
You ENCOURAGE the double down.
The unique problem with radicalisation vs people being just dumb is that it is more like cult programming/thought reform than evidence and reason.
Reasonable actions are all reframed as some big conspiracy by an all-powerful out-group to persecute you.
Interesting to see the “identifies as” moniker used in things like “identifies as a democratic socialist” or “identifies as an entrepreneur” etc.
Think about the mind trick. You don’t have to BE it. Or earn it. You identify as it. Brand yourself without needing to do or be.
It is a strangely US phenomenon: making everything tangible metaphysical so that you can define the material and move the bar. “Merit” is “having money because money is the result of work”
Or to be a Democrat who undermines and abuses democratic process; or claim you’re a socialist whilst getting people fired on behalf of corporate greed.
This all makes sense under “identity”. Because it’s identity. No barriers, no gatekeepers, no truth. Just you and your grift.
To acknowledge that @AOC is allowed to have a meal and be off the clock
Is to acknowledge that everyone is allowed to have food and be off the clock
For everyone joking that Soylent Green is 2022, they don’t seem to understand that we’re already there.
I mean we can’t all slave away at all that reading and engaging with material and hustle to get all that merit like @Daverubin. How someone claims to have studied politics and thinks California is communism 😂 yeah… merit. Or ya know… useful greedy idiot
You can have your beefs with AOC but know that she’s working within a system that was destined to eat her alive.
If the right wing didn’t get her, the celebrity would have
It’s a machine. It’s what it does. Squashes people or buys them off.
Man if actual refugees got the warm welcome that super oppressed Dave Rubin got from all the right wing fuckwits for escaping a Communist regime (😂😂😂😂)… imagine how different the world would be.
That love bomb is so fucking gross. Why are people still defending this fool?
Imagine a world where you make millions policing whether a left wing person with a job has a meal or charges for services
What’s your argument?
“Haha what a hypocrite! Everybody knows refugees just need more merit!”
Man with all the intellectual merit and ideas Dave Rubin
Imagine with all of - this - in the world
Being a failed comedian, failed political scientist, arguably one of the dumbest commentators there are
And claim you earned it, and police AOC enjoying breakfast.