Interesting to see the “identifies as” moniker used in things like “identifies as a democratic socialist” or “identifies as an entrepreneur” etc.
Think about the mind trick. You don’t have to BE it. Or earn it. You identify as it. Brand yourself without needing to do or be.
It is a strangely US phenomenon: making everything tangible metaphysical so that you can define the material and move the bar. “Merit” is “having money because money is the result of work”
Or to be a Democrat who undermines and abuses democratic process; or claim you’re a socialist whilst getting people fired on behalf of corporate greed.
This all makes sense under “identity”. Because it’s identity. No barriers, no gatekeepers, no truth. Just you and your grift.
If you ignore the material at the expense of identity and “merit” meaning “already rich”:
You don’t need school. You don’t need food. You don’t need love and belonging.
You can redefine what “work” is and make borderline slavery “work”.
It’s all metaphysical, right?
Because when it is metaphysical you can do anything™️. Opinions equal facts, rich people work hard, men are women, Ivy League grads are oppressed.
And you can identify as a socialist because it means nothing. It’s just optics and branding.
The American Fever Dream.
Because I’ve been in an industry littered with “gurus”, it’s painfully obvious that this is the online MLM cultists fused with televangelism fused with US interests. But most don’t see this. Anyway interesting to see that “identity” has rubber-stamped self appointed gurus.
I mean if you simply called yourself a socialist you’d be asked what you’ve actually done/accomplished. To be a professional you’d have to show your work. To identify as something is to frame any challenge of it as offensive and personal.
Interesting innit.
When I say it is a US phenomenon I mean that after decades of US dominance in academic journals and media (cultural hegemony is the term)… it has effectively supplanted most of our institutions and replaced the physical with metaphysical nonsense.
In this vein, it’s why things like the Metaverse are pushed without irony or criticism in any meaningful way. Because US Capitalism is very much focused on narrative-building, cult programming etc it’s really just the logical next step from here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Desperately want to talk about the mass formation psychosis stuff (I already knew about it, and have been warning about it in so many words for some time), but I know what's good for me. As for whether this is another bullshit twisting by the far right, I have concerns... but...
So, this has played out very much like I expected.
The far right disinformation propaganda/radicalisation networks use SEO effectively as part of their strategy. So they make sure they are the source when people Google. It's like whack-a-mole there.
Now, one thing the right does is take a niche concept and create checklists that feed confirmation bias. I have had things I said to people in that network taken and used in that way. But the thing is they both do it. You need to look at the tactics.
She has a name. She has expertise. She thinks you should get better sources than James Lindsay, who is promoting the same old red scare nonsense from the 1960s. lol
Is there anything more tedious than pseudointellectual culture wars bros quoting Lindsay at women who know better?
It’s always nice to know that a random dude quoting a person outside the Humanities who purposely leaves parts out due to his funding is still considered more authoritative than a “she” who knows what she’s talking about.
We are arguing this from the wrong angle - those who love censorship don't care about the civil liberties of their enemy. That is how outgrouping works.
It's like spanking of kids. You can't proselytize it.
It simply doesn't work.
The problem with the radicalisation funnels is that they already have this stuff built in.
You are the victim
You are under attack
THEY are powerful
THEY will censor you
So when you censor it, what happens?
You ENCOURAGE the double down.
The unique problem with radicalisation vs people being just dumb is that it is more like cult programming/thought reform than evidence and reason.
Reasonable actions are all reframed as some big conspiracy by an all-powerful out-group to persecute you.
To acknowledge that @AOC is allowed to have a meal and be off the clock
Is to acknowledge that everyone is allowed to have food and be off the clock
For everyone joking that Soylent Green is 2022, they don’t seem to understand that we’re already there.
I mean we can’t all slave away at all that reading and engaging with material and hustle to get all that merit like @Daverubin. How someone claims to have studied politics and thinks California is communism 😂 yeah… merit. Or ya know… useful greedy idiot
You can have your beefs with AOC but know that she’s working within a system that was destined to eat her alive.
If the right wing didn’t get her, the celebrity would have
It’s a machine. It’s what it does. Squashes people or buys them off.
Man if actual refugees got the warm welcome that super oppressed Dave Rubin got from all the right wing fuckwits for escaping a Communist regime (😂😂😂😂)… imagine how different the world would be.
That love bomb is so fucking gross. Why are people still defending this fool?
Imagine a world where you make millions policing whether a left wing person with a job has a meal or charges for services
What’s your argument?
“Haha what a hypocrite! Everybody knows refugees just need more merit!”
Man with all the intellectual merit and ideas Dave Rubin
Imagine with all of - this - in the world
Being a failed comedian, failed political scientist, arguably one of the dumbest commentators there are
And claim you earned it, and police AOC enjoying breakfast.
Now obviously I agree that this creates a conflict. I’ve known many a female cop who would never have the red carpet rolled out like this.
Also, the Police Comms team desperately trying to look inclusive and cool is hilarious. They shouldn’t be using their staff as props.
But they should also know that this would occur. I do not agree with the mocking of this cop’s appearance and I don’t know their story. But the conflict still exists even if the mean girls and trolls aren’t being nice.