3–5% of $1.54 quadrillion in global wealth is $36–77 trillion.
(BTW, the corporate treasures Michael @saylor has you focused on? They're only $4 trillion, which is 0.26% of global wealth or 0.39% of financial assets, which is...nothing.)
At the time, Bitcoin's market cap was ~$1 trillion. 1% of that is $10 billion.
Divide that by $93 million and you get a multiplier effect of 107.5x, driven by Bitcoin's low float, inflexible supply and unwilling sellers (that's you, hodlers).
[10/18] ⤵️
Using the low end of $36–77 trillion (from @ricedelman's 3–5%) and applying the 107.5x multiplier to $36 trillion brings us to $3.87 quadrillion.
That is more than double the amount of global wealth.
In other words, more than enough to trigger hyperbitcoinization.
[11/18] ⤵️
Would the 107.5x multiplier hold at that scale?
It seems to me (I'm @_log_scale_) that the multiplier would only *increase* as the world swarms to acquire something would be increasingly scarce and the most precious asset on earth.
[12/18] ⤵️
Dividing the $1.54 quadrillion of global wealth by 21 million BTC yields a value of $73 million per 1 BTC.
(There would be no dollars to price Bitcoin in after hyperbitcoinization, so consider it purchasing power in today's dollars.)
[13/18] ⤵️
Subtracting the 2.08 million BTC that have yet to be mined per TimechainStats.com, and 1.78 million BTC that have never left their miner address and are mostly lost forever per @glassnode, there's a circulating supply of 17.1 million BTC.
We'll start with smaller names and work up to folks with big names like @mcuban, such as @jimcramer, @RayDalio, @DaveRamsey, @joerogan. And we'll work up to bigger names in bitcoin like tonight's panel.
Being on the front lines of the greatest, most dramatic revolution in the history of our species. Which will improve the lives of all, as it solves the major problems of the world.