The new smart contrarian take is telling people to shut up about the decline of US democracy, no-one cares bro.
FWIW the US gets uniquely generous treatment from the rest of the world not just because it's powerful, but also because it's seen as a stable democracy. As that perception declines, so will a lot of other material benefits in the US.
When you want to say "make the trains run on time" but also, you hate trains
A generous interpretation of the original tweet is that it's not enough to raise the alarm about creeping authoritarianism. Specific changes should also be proposed. OK, but it seems like mass public needs to understand the stakes given that one party is blocking elite-led change
Fuck it, I'm going to write a substack post this week about threats to US democracy, specifically the targeting of election officials. Pointing out the risks, and the means by which they are emerging seems important even if we don't have all the answers.
This is an incredible story of how a tax break aimed at small businesses is converted into a tax-free intergenerational wealth accumulation machine for Silicon Valley investors. Via @JesseDrucker@maureenmfarrell nytimes.com/2021/12/28/bus…
One takeaway here is that Congress passes tax laws without really understanding the long term costs b/c they do not anticipate how the tax avoidance industry will weaponize it
The cost of this tax loophole is at least $60 billion but probably multiples of that because of the creative ways it is being exploited. It’s so bad the Trump admin tried to corral it, but faced pushback from tax lawyers.
The idea that something is a "cultural identity marker" means that people attribute some non-instrumental symbolic value to it. Seems like the people who are willing to risk illness, death and the infection of others to do something are the ones more driven by cultural values.
If the media you consume, or your political identity is causing you to hurt yourself and others, that seems like a cultural problem. I'm sure liberal finger-wagging is irritating, but hard to see how that's the bigger problem here. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/fox-news-is-…
Dr. Oz has made his medical credentials the center of his political campaign for Senate. But he has trafficked in misinformation about COVID and other public health issues for years. Very damning review of his record. nytimes.com/2021/12/26/us/…
Oz knows that "Dr. Oz" is central to whatever political appeal he has. He flips out if he is not being called Dr.
Well before he entered politics, Oz's colleagues at Columbia raised concerns about his comfort in lending his name - and the prestige of Columbia - to quack claims.
Heckman gives the impression that Denmark's welfare state does not reduce inequality, then in a casual aside at the end, acknowledges that it does but via solutions (wealth redistribution) he seems to dislike rather than his preferred approach of education.
Heckman is a great scholar, and I buy his underlying research that the more advantaged can benefit more from more generous public services. But this seems to argue for inequality-reducing policies that can't be gamed, rather than assuming there is nothing to learn from Denmark.
People can agree on what the research tells us, but disagree on the implications. For me, Heckman's work helps to narrow the search for how Denmark reduced intergenerational inequality and draw more attention to redistribution.
H/T Gray Kimbrough
Meghan McCain is blaming political ideology for her failures as View presenter, but her political ideology and famous name helped get her invited to the party in the first place, she can't have it both ways.
If I was Meghan McCain I would simply not write stories alleging that someone's career was based on favoritism.
In a column where she spends multiple paragraphs reminiscing about her Dad, McCain declares that she, for one, believes that the most qualified person should get the job. Riiiight.
First observation: my most popular piece was about the culture wars! But my interest is how culture war politics affect governance, so I followed this up with a series of stories about how the anti-CRT movement is affecting school officials and leading to book bans. 2/