To allow gamekeepers to kill crows and jackdaws to "protect" pheasants and partridges, the pheasants and partridges are classed as livestock. But you aren't allowed to shoot livestock for sport, so when pheasants and partridges are being shot, they're classed as wildlife.
Thread/
Thread/
But you aren't allowed to round up wild animals at the end of the shooting season, and trap them in enclosures, so when the survivors are being rounded up, they become livestock again.
But if a pheasant flies into a car during the roundup, and causes a crash, you're not legally liable, because, for this purpose, it becomes wildlife again.
But if it survives the crash and you use it to breed more pheasants, it becomes livestock again, enabling you to claim tax breaks and subsidies.
It makes you wonder who wrote these laws ....
It makes you wonder who wrote these laws ....
Actually, we know who wrote (or passed) these laws: MPs and lords who own shooting estates. They created a fantastically tortuous legal system to enable this unspeakable "sport" to continue, regardless of the havoc it wreaks and the ecological damage it inflicts.
For people with this mindset, the animal kingdom is divided into two categories.
Game, which you pay to kill.
Vermin, which you pay other people to kill.
Game, which you pay to kill.
Vermin, which you pay other people to kill.
The pheasant is a non-native bird that belongs to the same family as chickens and turkeys (Phasianidae).
Imagine the outcry if farmers bred 47 million chickens every year to be released, then forced to fly over a line of people with shotguns, to be blasted out of the air.
Imagine the outcry if farmers bred 47 million chickens every year to be released, then forced to fly over a line of people with shotguns, to be blasted out of the air.
Why do we see this any differently? Why are people allowed to kill and wound livestock for pleasure? Why are they allowed to release a greater weight of birds into the countryside every year than all the native birds in the UK put together?
Why are these omnivorous birds allowed to devastate our wildlife, clearing woods and fields of insects, lizards, baby snakes, seeds and anything else they can find? Why are their owners allowed to kill a vast range of wildlife to protect this unfenced livestock?
Every aspect of this practice is an outrage. It reflects the continued domination of a landed elite, whose power is such that they can craft the law to suit themselves, however labyrinthine it has to be.
Is this country a democracy, or a semi-feudal barony?
Is this country a democracy, or a semi-feudal barony?
It's a gigantic, state-sanctioned cosplay, simultaneously deadly serious and utterly risible. 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
