🚨⚖️COURT ALERT: Federal lawsuits challenging Alabama's congressional map are headed to court this morning.

Here's what you need to know.👇🧵
AL has a long history of racial discrimination & gerrymandering in redistricting. Past maps have been drawn to "pack" Black voters into specific districts & "crack" Black communities elsewhere in the state, leading to Black Alabamians having less voting strength & representation.
The map drawn in 2021 continues to do the same. While Black residents make up over 25% of Alabama's population, only 1 of the 7 congressional districts is drawn to include a majority-Black population and the districts fail to represent Alabama's growing diversity.
So voters and advocacy groups sued, filing three lawsuits:

⚖️Singleton v. Merrill: democracydocket.com/cases/alabama-…
⚖️Caster v. Merrill: democracydocket.com/cases/alabama-…
⚖️Milligan v. Merrill: democracydocket.com/cases/alabama-…
SINGLETON:

PLAINTIFFS: AL voters
DEFENDANT: AL Sec. of State Merrill (R)
CLAIMS: The 2011 & 2021 congressional maps are racial gerrymanders (when race is used as the predominant factor in redistricting without any compelling interest) that violate the 14th & 15th Amendments.
CASTER:

PLAINTIFFS: AL voters
DEFENDANT: AL Sec. of State Merrill (R)
CLAIMS: The 2021 congressional map violates Section 2 of the VRA because it intentionally dilutes the voting strength of Black voters by creating 1 majority-Black district when a second one should be drawn.
MILLIGAN:

PLAINTIFFS: AL voters, Greater Birmingham Ministries & AL NAACP
DEFENDANT: AL Sec. of State Merrill (R)
CLAIMS: The new maps are racial gerrymanders in violation of the 14th Amendment and Black voters were packed into 1 district in violation of Section 2 of the VRA.
In summary, each case challenges Alabama’s new congressional map on the basis of race, but on different grounds: the Singleton plaintiffs bring racial gerrymandering constitutional claims; the Caster plaintiffs bring vote dilution VRA claims; the Milligan plaintiffs bring both.
All plaintiffs want the current map to be tossed and replaced with a new map that fairly represents Alabama’s Black population. The Caster and Milligan plaintiffs specifically ask for the creation of a second majority-Black congressional district in AL.
Today, a federal court will hear the plaintiffs' requests for a preliminary injunction (PI). If granted, the PI would prevent the new map passed by the Alabama Legislature from being used in 2022 congressional elections while litigation continues.
With Alabama's candidate filing deadline rapidly approaching (Jan. 28, 2022), we should expect a ruling on the requests for preliminary injunction soon.
If you would like to stream today’s court proceedings, you can request login credentials here👇alnd.uscourts.gov/instructions-v…

Make sure to have the following information on hand:

NAME: Singleton v. Merrill
DATE: 1/4/2021
TIME: 9:00 AM CST
CASE #: N.D. Ala. 2:21-cv-1291
We'll keep you updated on any major developments.

Be sure to subscribe to the Democracy Docket newsletter to get the latest redistricting news👇 democracydocket.com/subscribe-demo…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Democracy Docket

Democracy Docket Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DemocracyDocket

4 Jan
🚨⚖️COURT ALERT: Lawsuits asking the court to intervene in Minnesota's redistricting process are scheduled for oral argument today.

Here's what you need to know👇🧵
Minnesota hasn't passed any new maps yet this redistricting cycle. The lawsuits filed in Minnesota are a special type of case called "impasse litigation." These lawsuits are filed when lawmakers cannot agree on new maps as election deadlines are approaching.
In most states, impasse litigation is filed in only extreme circumstances. But some states, like Minnesota, go through impasse litigation every redistricting cycle. In fact, MN has had impasse litigation every cycle since 1970.
Read 20 tweets
3 Jan
🚨⚖️COURT ALERT: Lawsuits challenging North Carolina's new legislative and congressional maps go to trial today. #ncpol

Here's what you need to know.👇🧵
In this trial, the plaintiffs are trying to prove that NC's new legislative and congressional maps are gerrymandered to benefit Republicans and dilute the voting strength of Black voters, violating the state constitution.
First, let's clear up why North Carolina courts can even hear partisan gerrymandering claims. In 2019, SCOTUS held in Rucho v. Common Cause that partisan gerrymandering claims are non-justiciable political issues — meaning that *federal* courts CANNOT hear these claims.
Read 24 tweets
16 Dec 21
Calls to reform or abolish the filibuster are growing as the outdated Senate rule continues to block critical legislation.

Take a look at who from the Democratic Caucus has already expressed support to change the filibuster to protect voting rights👇🧵
Read 27 tweets
14 Dec 21
🗳@SenatorWarnock just gave a speech on the Senate floor on the urgent need for voting rights legislation.

Here are some highlights from his speech⤵️🧵
"The American people have been pushing for leaders in Washington to address voting rights...They know their history. They are witnessing what is happening to our democracy in real-time. And they see the handwriting on the wall."
"They see the sweeping voter suppression proposals in 49 states and the dozens of new laws that have now popped up across the nation, fueled by the Big Lie that seeks to delegitimize the voices of millions of Georgians and Americans, who made their voices heard..." 1/2
Read 19 tweets
3 Dec 21
⚖️NC Redistricting Hearing Updates:

🧵
The court consolidated the two cases, Harper v. Hall and North Carolina League of Conservation Voters (NCLCV) v. Hall, into one case under the name NCLCV v. Hall.

Find the original complaints here:
NCLCV: democracydocket.com/cases/north-ca…
Harper: democracydocket.com/cases/north-ca…
NCLCV: "In all three maps, so long as you have results within 7 points...you are going to have baked in majorities for the incumbent [Republican] party in every chamber."
Read 18 tweets
3 Dec 21
🚨⚖️COURT ALERT: A hearing will be held this morning in North Carolina regarding challenges to the state's new redistricting maps.

Here's what you need to know about the lawsuits🧵👇
There are two lawsuits involved in this hearing. Both challenge the constitutionality of the new congressional map as a partisan gerrymander. The second lawsuit also challenges the General Assembly maps and includes a racial gerrymandering claim.
Despite the fact that North Carolina is split almost 50/50 Republican and Democrat in state-wide elections, the new congressional map would overwhelming consolidate GOP power in the Tar Heel state with:
🖊10 GOP districts
🖊3 Democratic districts
🖊1 competitive district
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(