People say that we should update vaccines so they will make antibodies that are better adapted to Omicron, but I wonder if there isn't a case that we should deliberately *not* do that. Here is the argument, which may be completely wrong. 1/n
It's now pretty clear that Omicron is intrinsically milder than previous strains, so since SARS-CoV-2 is not going anywhere, it's better if Omicron replaces all the other strains and fully takes over everywhere eventually. 2/n
If this happens, there is a better chance that all variants in the future will descend from Omicron, and therefore a better chance they'll be similarly mild. This would put us in a more desirable endemic equilibrium other things being equal. 3/n
Now, Omicron has a better chance of taking over everywhere if it keeps its transmission advantage thanks to greater immune escape, which will no longer be the case or to a lesser extent if we give people Omicron-adapted boosters now. 4/n
We can always give people Omicron-adapted boosters later, when it has truly taken over everywhere, so that from that point on any new variant will likely descend from Omicron and inherit its relative mildness. 5/n
The reason why I think this argument might be completely wrong is that it assumes there are "developmental constraints" so that, once you start from Omicron, you are unlikely to get a more virulent strain via natural selection. 6/n
If this isn't true, not vaccinating people with Omicron-adapted boosters now will just result in more deaths in the short-run, without putting us in a more desirable endemic equilibrium in the long-run, so again this idea may be completely stupid. 7/n
But if there *are* such developmental constraints (do we even know?) then it might be a good idea to wait before we inject people with Omicron-adapted boosters, just so we don't reduce Omicron's transmission advantage by negative its immune evasion advantage. 8/n
Despite what many people believe, there is no reason why an emergent virus must always evolve to become less virulent, so with Omicron we have just lucked out and I wonder if, by injecting people with Omicron-adapted boosters now, we might not squander this bit of luck. 9/n
It probably doesn't matter anyway, because we're clearly too dumb to test, approve, produce and inject on a large scale Omicron-adapted boosters before Omicron has fully taken over, if it's destined to do so, but I thought it was something interesting to think about. 10/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philippe Lemoine

Philippe Lemoine Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @phl43

5 Jan
Je rappelle que, contrairement à ce que prétend cet imbécile, 1) *personne* n'oblige le gouvernement à décider la moindre mesure de restriction et 2) le passe vaccinal n'empêchera *en rien* une éventuelle surcharge des unités de réanimation.
Il ne faut jamais cesser de rappeler le premier point : la décision de mettre en place des restrictions est un choix politique et le gouvernement pourrait tout à fait choisir de ne pas le faire, comme les autorités l'ont fait dans d'autres pays, donc qu'il l'assume son choix !
Quant au second, même si on fait des hypothèses délirantes sur l'effet du passe vaccinal sur la vaccination, compte tenu du délai entre vaccination et protection, la vague actuelle aura déjà commencé à redescendre depuis longtemps au moment où ça produira des effets...
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
Even if Delta had a R0 of ~6, and the estimate of Omicron's transmission advantage in that study were correct, you could *not* infer that it has a R0 of ~18 because this advantage is likely due mostly or perhaps even entirely to Omicron's better ability to evade prior immunity!
This inference is based on a confusion between a *transmission* advantage and a *transmissibility* advantage, but as I explained before those are distinct concepts and it's important to distinguish them, otherwise you end up making this kind of mistake. cspicenter.org/blog/waronscie…
Moreover, as I explained in this article, we don't really have very good reasons to think that Delta has a R0 of 6, precisely because it's very difficult to estimate a variant's *transmissibility* advantage from its *transmission* advantage in a particular context.
Read 5 tweets
2 Jan
Les gens qui nous gouvernent n'ont pas la moindre idée de ce qu'ils feront dans 15 jours, encore moins dans un an, mais il y a tout un tas de gens qui s'imaginent que tout cela fait partie d'un plan mûrement réfléchi dont on se demande bien d'ailleurs quel pourrait être le but...
Il fait de l'ironie parce que ça lui semble insensé, mais c'est pourtant très exactement ce qui s'est passé 🤷‍♂️
C'est absolument sidérant que les gens trouvent ce scénario absurde, mais que par contre ils trouvent l'idée que ce qui se passe est le fruit d'un complot visant à "contrôler les populations" (peu importe que ça ne veuille à peu près rien dire) pour servir "Big Pharma", qui
Read 6 tweets
30 Dec 21
Amazingly, not only is this wrong, but it's literally the opposite of the correct inference 🤦‍♂️
If antibodies from vaccination or prior infection can't neutralize Omicron well, but vaccinated and previously infected people are still protected against severe disease, then it should obviously *increase* your credence that T-cells play a role in protecting against disease...
Of course, it also shows that T-cells won't prevent you from testing positive or even having symptoms, but nobody expected them to do that 🤷‍♂️It's amazing the nonsense "zero COVID" folks will peddle to support this policy even when they should know better.
Read 10 tweets
28 Dec 21
Audience capture is one hell of a drug.
The most amazing part is that he probably believes that nonsense at this point. It’s the same as with virtue signaling and more generally any case where someone says something because it’s in their interest: it actually produces genuine belief pretty quickly.
It’s very difficult psychologically to spend your life going around saying things you know to be false, so pretty soon you start believing your own nonsense. This is also why politicians are not nearly as cynical as people generally assume.
Read 5 tweets
23 Dec 21
C'est étrange mais je n'ai pas le souvenir que, quand Fillon avait fait une visite très médiatique à Niamey en décembre 2016, votre ministère s'était fendu d'un communiqué pour dire que c'était contraire aux règles 🤔 Vous ne nous prendriez pas un peu pour des cons par hasard ?
Fillon avait carrément débarqué avec Jeudy dans ses bagages pour qu'il couvre sa visite dans Paris Match, mais les mecs veulent nous faire croire que Zemmour a violé une règle dont tout le monde ignorait l'existence jusqu'à aujourd'hui (parce qu'elle n'a jamais existé), mdr.
Ce qui s'est passé c'est que Macron avait tranquillement commencé à s'empiffrer de foie gras quand il s'est aperçu que Zemmour était en train de faire une opération de com à Abidjan et qu'il a passé un savon à Parly qui a envoyé Grandjean inventer cette histoire de toute pièce 🤷‍♂️
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(