And I will say, I experienced 2.5 years of that at my first firm. The physical consequences were shocking - the list of ailments that working so much under stress caused *me* (maybe not you, I get it) was extreme.
Psychologically less extreme, but I was (as I have said many times before) extremely befuddled by being so miserable at a job and I thought I must have done something wrong.
Anyway, if you are an M&A associate billing 400 hours or whatever other nonsense, and you are suffering, let me repeat my admonition. Stop... Doing.... It. Now. ASAP. Not next year.
If you have to talk fast because otherwise you might lose your 10 minutes of sleep, stop. Don’t do that.
What are you gonna do with the $15 million or whatever you make before keeling over. Buy a nice mausoleum for yourself? Nah man.
Again, some people do this fine and love the financial rewards. That’s fine with me. But it’s mostly not worth it.
And to wrap back around to my first tweet, a big firm M&A practice is not going to change if you are very sad or something. You can't negotiate with an angry Cave Ogre. You just leave the cave.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK, I'm going to be somewhat livetweeting the Fifth Circuit oral argument in the #SB8 remand.
To recap, what is going on? #SB8 is Texas's unusual private enforcement abortion ban. 1/
The Supreme Court said that the abortion providers could sue, but only certain Texas licensing officials, based on their understanding of Texas State law. The Court remanded to the Fifth Circuit, presumably(?) to send to the district court to adjudicate those claims /2
But Texas jumped in, and told the Fifth Circuit that Texas law doesn't really allow this licensing officials to enforce anything, as Justice Thomas had suggested. So Texas asked the Fifth Circuit to send the case to the Texas Supreme Court to answer that question instead. /3
I know less than zero about international law, but I happened on this opinion granting a preliminary injunction in Armenia v Azerbaijan that I found of interest. 1/
A lot of it is familiar to me as an American lawyer. The factors are almost the same as what we would think about. But the subject matter is so different — is the destruction of cultural patrimony irreparable harm, for example? /2
Have to say I loved this part of the injunction! I wish you could just order people not to be a pain in the butt.
Ok, this story is amazing. He went to the Sun and Sand Hotel pool in Bombay with some Indian friends. They were going to let him in, but they said the Indians couldn’t come in because it was whites only. Dad started shouting.