This is Khadijah Farmer. In 2008, she was ejected from a woman's toilet in New York because "she looked like a man".
Khadijah Farmer is not trans. She's a woman. I'm just wondering how people on my TL explain what happened to her.
This is Eloise Stonborough. She's not trans either. She's a woman. She's been 'confronted tens of times in public toilets'.
Including by a woman as she stood quietly in line to use a toilet in a park. “She stormed off in a huff when I refused to leave".
“One of the worst times was in an art gallery. A man started screaming that there was ‘a f**king man going into the toilet’ at the top of his voice, and started following me around the gallery once I’d left the toilet. I had to tell security so he could be escorted out".
There was even a confrontation at an Eddie Izzard gig, where Stonborough was driven from the toilets by a person who called her a “pervert”.
My TL is currently full of people who insist that 100% of women worldwide ALWAYS, in ALL circumstances, know when someone's a woman or not
So how do they explain these two cases? And they're not the only ones either.
Below, a thread from Quora. "How do I, as a biological female who gets mistaken for a man, cope with it? I hate myself every day. I'm hideous". 😢
One of (very many) things which frightens me about the discourse right now is the prospect of this happening to other women with stereotypically masculine features.
Who by the way, exist! And always have.
It reminds me a bit of when a frothing mob went after a paediatrician because they thought that was the longhand for 'paedo'.
I thought this movement included challenging traditional stereotypes? Not reinforcing them whenever it suits you to 'own' someone on the internet?
I even saw a woman rejoicing that Harwood had been "ripped a new one".
Ripped a new one? Rapey, dehumanising, misogynistic, pornified language? About THIS? And no-one commenting below that tweet even noticed. Extraordinary.
The thing about this entire debate is it concerns people - trans people - who are a minority. A small minority. And with regard to small minorities, language ALWAYS matters.
That's not 'tone policing'. Nobody would say that when describing any other small minority.
There are also minorities of men with stereotypically feminine features and minorities of women with stereotypically masculine features.
Shall we just pretend they don't exist? Shall we erase them in the way women everywhere are frightened of their lives and rights being erased?
A majority, a large majority, even an enormous majority is not magically 100%.
People who defy your stereotypes and generalisations exist. And a discourse like this harms and yes, absolutely, can certainly endanger them.
It's not OK.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Congratulations to the protesters, who should never have been prosecuted to begin with, Mr "terrorists hate our freedoms but I want protesters locked up".
Down with slavery apologists and down with those who've been rewriting history for centuries.
People like YOU.
Kelvin MacKenzie, by way of reminder:
- Cheerlead Thatcher's devastation of communities throughout the UK
The idea that JK Rowling is in any way an antisemite is offensive, preposterous, disgraceful nonsense.
But the idea that Jeremy Corbyn is in any way an antisemite was also offensive, preposterous, disgraceful nonsense, and she joined in with that.
Witchhunts are NEVER OK.
"Burn the witch! Burn the witch!" From a frothing, shameless mob in both cases.
Memo to everyone: someone is not an antisemite because of what happens to be YOUR political position and opinions. And if you had real humanity, you'd say so. In both cases and that of others too.
Do you know what Joanne and Jeremy have in common? They've both done a quite massive amount for vulnerable people.
For some reason, this never gets reported by their myriad haters: many of whom have never done a thing for vulnerable people in their entire lives.
11 years ago, I had the privilege of teaching a huge number of Indian and Bangladeshi students in their late teens and early 20s. Almost all of whom lived and breathed cricket in a manner I'd never come across before.
They all played cricket during lunch and in late afternoon.
I organised a live stream of the India-Pakistan and India-Sri Lanka World Cup semi and final, and a match between the Indian and Bangladeshi students.
Which I umpired and made a bit of a mess of.😳 Some of my decisions were so bad, the Indians were accusing me of matchfixing 🤣
The whole experience left me with a heck of a lot more respect for officials in all sports: it's a bloody hard job, believe me.
When you get a call wrong and KNOW you've got it wrong, then unless you're a narcissist, you start second guessing yourself. Which leads to chaos.
With the fourth ritual humiliation - ahem, I mean Fourth Test - just getting underway, here's a rundown of my ideal cricket team since I started following the game in the late 1980s.
CG Greenidge (West Indies)
MJ Slater (Australia)
IVA Richards (West Indies) (capt)
SR Tendulkar (India)
R Dravid (India)
SR Waugh (Australia)
AC Gilchrist (Australia) (wkt)
SK Warne (Australia)
MD Marshall (West Indies)
CEL Ambrose (West Indies)
W Younis (Pakistan)
2nd XI:
GA Gooch (England)
ST Jayasuriya (Sri Lanka)
RT Ponting (Australia)
KC Sangakkara (Sri Lanka) (capt) (wkt)
PA de Silva (Sri Lanka)
AL Logie (West Indies)
A Flintoff (England)
W Akram (Pakistan)
M Muralitharan (Sri Lanka)
AA Donald (South Africa)
GD McGrath (Australia)
See also, the loony right in Argentina. Which to its eternal shame, urged people not to take the vaccine because they were being "experimented on" - then harangued the government when the rollout and uptake weren't fast enough. 🙄🙄