Best wishes for 2022 everyone! 🎉

As we enter the new year, I wanted to share a bit of LP perspective.

We all know the venture market was on 🔥 in 2021, but how is that actually manifesting and what does that mean for how the proverbial table is being set for 2022?
Here’s what us LPs are seeing and some of the questions LPs are asking themselves going into 2022.

#OpenLP
1 - The average capital called in the 1st year of a fund is accelerating rapidly.

In 2021, our portfolio averaged 33% in terms of capital called in a fund’s first year, which implies an initial investment period well below two years.
This is new.

And what that means for LPs/venture industry still remains to be seen.

Open questions abound on the value of time diversity in a portfolio vs not ‘playing the game on the field’.

Classic article on this topic from @bgurley: abovethecrowd.com/2014/01/24/on-…
Another interesting question (that @Lux_Capital touches on in their excellent quarterly LP letter)...

What if LPs get indigestion??? I haven’t seen many signs of this yet, but given the pace of fundraising it's something we are keeping an eye out for.

2 - Future LP indigestion notwithstanding, there are still mountains of dry powder ready to pour into venture in 2022 ($900B to be exact, says the @WSJ).

So it's hard to see any near term slow down in startup fundraising or competition for term sheets.

wsj.com/articles/the-9…
3 - Why? Because money seeking alpha has been looking to venture thanks to some recent pretty eye popping returns.

More here on recent fund vintage performance benchmarks:

Lots of reasons for this… the rapid digitization of industries thanks in no small part to year 2 of the pandemic, a robust public market (IPO and to a lesser extent SPACs), M&A, crypto driving fast valuation/liquidity, low interest rates (for now)… just to name a few.
4 - And about that IPO market… despite an EoY pullback on tech stocks, 2021 saw 55 software IPOs with at least a $175M market cap (excluding SPACs).
This trounces what we’ve seen in the past.

And (along with IPOs in 2020 coming off lock up in 2021) created significant amounts of liquidity for LPs, GPs, and entrepreneurs alike.
Liquidity is a critical component of the venture market.

It keeps everything moving forward by providing (among other things) the $$$ LPs use to re-invest in venture funds.
5 - Which brings us back to where LPs put their $$$ in 2021 and what that might tell us about this upcoming year and the choices LPs may make.
While the final numbers are still being true’d up, all signs point to $100BN+ being raised by venture funds in 2021, making it *the most money raised by US venture funds in a single year.*

Ever.

Wow.
Of this $100BN+...

Capital continues to concentrate into fewer funds overall thanks to outsized funds (funds that raise $1BN+). 2021 had many… about 20 $1BN+ funds raised.

Not surprisingly then, established funds continue to make up the majority of funds that raised in 2021.
Not all funds raised were mega funds, however.

2021 saw the continued rise of solo GPs, rolling funds, syndicate funds, and funds focused on new (er) themes like underrepresented founders, crypto, climate, and impact-oriented funds.

More here: bit.ly/34f3Eku
6 - All of this makes for a fascinating set of questions in front of LPs for 2022. No one knows if all will continue to be “up and to the right,” but the importance and power of tech-enabled companies is undeniable.

Big picture question: Where will LPs choose to invest in 2022?
Will they re-invest in existing managers that have produced strong returns despite (or because of?) ever increasing fund sizes?

Or will LPs look to access new markets/networks/perspectives/go-to-market strategies... (and smaller funds sizes)... by focusing on emerging managers?
And how real will LP indigestion become?

It could very well slow down fundraising for some, if not all, funds.

Many important questions still swirling about in today’s juiced up venture market… Hello 2022!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elizabeth Clarkson

Elizabeth Clarkson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Beezer232

2 Nov 21
Hey GPs - In the last few weeks I’ve had multiple asks about emerging manager benchmarks/what we are seeing for 2019 (and other recent) vintages.

So here’s a quick 🧵 breaking down what we see in the case of 2019 venture funds and the greater LP context…

#OpenLP
Key point: 2019 funds, emerging or otherwise, are *really* new.

Stating the obvious here, but it’s worth reiterating.

In the olden days of venture, asking about benchmarks on funds <2 years old wasn’t a thing.
Cambridge specifically caveats that “research shows that most funds take at least six years to settle into their final quartile ranking.”

But what the heck...welcome to 2021! 😂
Read 18 tweets
1 Mar 21
Lots of ink is spilled parsing differences b/w pre-seed vs seed vs early stage (etc…) investing. But some truths hold across all stages of venture investing! @alexiskold digs in here: startuphacks.vc/blog/7-truths-… #OpenLP
Truth 1. Venture outcomes are driven by a power law.

Power law is an immutable law of the universe, and that extends to #VC too. Most startups fail, but the biggest winners, when they happen, tend to be huge.

VC’s NEED 🦄’s (and decacorns!) to succeed.
Truth 2. Your Fund Size is Your Strategy

A fund's portfolio construction will depend on how much capital is under management.

This is why funds often specialize at a specific stage of investing (ie. <$50M fund = pre-seed/seed, $150-$300M fund = seed/series A, etc...).
Read 8 tweets
25 Feb 21
The great debate in #VC “follow-on/pro-rata investing” vs “multiples on dollar invested” continues... #OpenLP -->
.@fintechjunkie wrote a fantastic thread detailing the power of concentrating #vc’s capital into its best companies.
.@dunkhippo33 gave great insights into the power of multiples not ownership for smaller funds.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(