We don't talk enough about how bat shit insane it is that monopolistic Silicon Valley corporations censor people in obedience to US government orders, up to and including censoring discussion of a wildly important historical figure who was assassinated by that same US government.
Medhurst literally just posted screenshots from this thread. Tell me what's in here that you think should be censored on US government orders and why that should not freak you the fuck out.
When I talk about censorship on social media I always get airheads bleating "Hurr, durr, it's not censorship, it's a private company enforcing their TOS." No it's censorship you idiot. It's just a job that's been outsourced by the government like everything else in neoliberalism.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

28 Dec 21
This is what happened in Syria, it's what happened in Libya, and it's what was on track to happen in Xinjiang before Beijing said "nah" and launched its crackdown. The west isn't mad at Beijing for committing a "genocide", it's mad at Beijing for preventing one.
The actual interest in Xinjiang has been about the fact that it is a key geostrategic region that the western empire would greatly benefit from balkanizing away from China so it can't fulfill the role planned for it in the Belt and Road Initiative.
Read 6 tweets
27 Dec 21
You can understand why the US political system refuses to bring Americans out of debt and impoverishment by imagining what would happen if it didn't. Ordinary people would use their new financial influence to create a system that serves them rather than a globe-spanning empire.
In a system where money equals power, people would begin using their new economic power to change political and economic realities for their benefit. They'd begin working to divert wasteful war machine spending to themselves. The oligarchs who control US politics can't have that.
Money is power and power is relative, so those with lots of money are incentivised to keep as much money as possible for themselves to maximize their power. If everyone a is king then nobody is a king.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec 21
The Assange Case Explained Simply

"The Assange issue is simple. What makes it seem complicated is the lies people have been fed by the media class whose job is to manipulate the public into consenting to the agendas of the US power alliance."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-assange-…
The Assange Case Explained Simply (Audio)

"One of the most common reasons I hear from people on their reluctance to wade into the Assange debate is that they don't understand it. It looks like a complicated issue to them, so they leave it to the experts."
soundcloud.com/going_rogue/th…
In reality, the complexity of this case is a complete illusion. It's very, very simple. It only looks complicated because many years of media distortion have made it appear so.
Read 14 tweets
15 Dec 21
Western concern trolling about China has nothing to do with "human rights". Every establishment China narrative is about the fact that it's in the western empire's interests for China to be weak and small while it's in China's interests for China to be big and strong. Thread.
Pretty much everything China gets slammed for by the imperial media is a response to western aggressions, whether you're talking about Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Taiwan, border disputes, sea navigation, or domestic authoritarianism. The US is the aggressor.
You'd have to be an absolute moron to believe the US and its allies give a shit about Muslims in Xinjiang after spending the last two decades butchering Muslims *by the millions* in the Middle East. It's because it's a geostrategically crucial region.
sbs.com.au/news/explainer…
Read 15 tweets
14 Dec 21
China is far, far better than the US. That doesn't mean China is awesome, it just means the US is far, far worse than anyone else in terms of tyranny and destructiveness. Working to destroy any population which disobeys you anywhere in the world makes you worse than anyone else.
The only reason nobody seems to recognize this in the west is because the US has such phenomenally excellent global narrative control. If it didn't, the entire world would've laughed when the butchers of the Middle East started pretending to care about Muslims in Xinjiang.
"China is more oppressive domestically, US is more oppressive abroad."

Nothing China is doing domestically is anywhere remotely as bad as what the US is doing abroad. Nothing China is doing rises to the level of the US killing millions and displacing tens of millions since 9/11.
Read 4 tweets
12 Dec 21
Very cute how The Guardian never uses the word "imperialism" except when it wants to criticize a nation the world's leading imperialist power doesn't like.
OH MY GOD
"was"????
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(