Anthony Bradley Profile picture
Jan 5, 2022 15 tweets 4 min read Read on X
The main cause of the vitriol against Du Mez et al is that the TGC, SBC, DG, 9 Marks, Acts 29, Calvinist etc. world never saw itself as a sociological object of critique. There is now an entire academic world focussed on their failures & Reformed men are losing their minds.
The TGC/DG/etc. world is a Christian culture lacking epistemic humility and discourages self-critique. Internal critics are called “anti-gospel.” They built an entire platform based on critiquing *everyone* but themselves & taught an entire generation of pastors to do the same.
Modern white Calvinists, in their arrogance, conflated their religious culture with “the gospel” itself. To critique their religious culture is somehow equivalent to critiquing Jesus, the gospel, the Bible, etc. It’s unreal!
So now their hyper-critical chickens are coming home to roost by army of PhDs who are equipped with analytical tools exposing them every side. Calvinist culture missed Jesus’ point about the speck in the eye. They cheered like sports fans when someone said, “Farewell, Rob Bell.”
In their blindness, they believed themselves to be united theologically when, in fact, American evangelicalism (Puritans to Edwards to the present) was always first and foremost a sociological coalition cloaked in theological language about “the gospel,” “inerrancy,” etc.
Because evangelicalism has always been a sociological coalition, not a biblical nor theological one, it’s entire American history was in direct opposition to racial freedom for blacks & black Christians from slavery through Jim Crow.
In the 1950s, they abandoned the cities (esp. adjacent to black neighborhoods) and built institutions in the suburbs, built by the government, to support white middle-class thriving. It reinforced their arrogance about being right. They’ve always believed themselves to be right.
So, when you teach your children that “all Christians are wrong *except for us*,” and an army of scholars pull the low hanging bad fruit of errors throughout your history, your prideful, and sadly immature, response will be “counter-attack and defend the tribe.”
I remember this back in 2004 when white Calvinists started calling me, “Nigger,” “Anferny,” etc. when I started critiquing them. I’m not sure where all these scholars were back then but I could have told them what to expect. That world will not change. Ever. It’s a fool’s errand.
I’ve seen it over the years & the response to Du Mez, Jones, Perry, Coley, et al is not surprising. Critiquing white evangelicalism will never change white evangelicalism. If that were true, we wouldn’t be here today. Black theologians had these critiques, in print, 100+ yrs ago.
So now, because their chickens are coming home to roost, they are only left to play their victim card and whine like pre-schoolers. They are fragile. As soon as *their* plank in the eye is pointed out, they pout and say, “Stop hurting us.” They coddled themselves & their kids. Image
The teams are set. “White evangelicalism” is about to get a bunch white scholars tenure. White Calvinism will feed off the perceived attacks and circle their wagons. Articles & counter-articles. Books & counter books. Conferences & counter-conferences. This will last for years.
At the end of the day it’s same debates between Graham, Niebuhr, and Tillich 2.0. What will be accomplished? Not much, as history shows. It’s why I returned to family & public policy issues. I’ve already experienced these topics bearing little to no fruit. amazon.com/Aliens-Promise…
If you’re a racial minority, don’t feel like you have to make “white evangelicalism” your life project. There are more important issues to address & the attention feeds their narcissism. The devil is active in lots of other spheres. You’re free to focus on many of those as well.
For minorities, these intramural debates are lively but eventually you’ll get bored and/or discouraged (trust me!). “As far as the curse is found” means that we need people’s thoughtful energies to address race & Christianity issues but much, much, much, much, MUCH, more!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anthony Bradley

Anthony Bradley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drantbradley

Apr 11
Evangelicals don't have an elite problem. They have a formation problem. They raise bubble-wrapped cubicle boys and then complain about them later becoming passive men. Raised for passivity, destined for people-pleasing. Image
Aaron Renn (@aaron_renn) is right that evangelicals are missing from the commanding heights of American culture. No Big Tech, major finance, elite universities. But diagnosis misses this: The problem isn't weak institutions. It's what evangelical culture reliably produces.
Spend time in conservative Christian communities and a pattern emerges. Boys are raised to be responsible, polite, and safe. Failure is moralized. Ambition is redirected. Stability is celebrated. That's not formation for leadership. That's not formation for entreprenuers.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 4
🧵New research just dropped and it challenges almost everything the culture wants you to believe about boys who grow up with violent fathers. Image
The headline finding is the one nobody wants to say out loud: Most boys who watch their fathers be violent do NOT become violent themselves. The intergenerational transmission story is far more complicated than the experts admit.
Boys across four countries were interviewed. They were not passive victims absorbing dad's behavior. They were moral agents making real decisions under terrible pressure.
Read 11 tweets
Sep 8, 2025
We tell teenage boys: "Volunteer. Join that club. Lead that project. It'll look great on your college application." This is one of the most damaging pieces of advice we can give them. It's creating a generation of young men who are accomplished and adrift. Here's why: 🧵 Image
This advice instrumentalizes virtue. It turns service, leadership, and hard work into mere tools for personal gain (careerism). The goal is no longer the good work itself, but the line it adds to a resume. This creates a deep and hollow "purpose-void."
True masculine virtue isn't found in curating a perfect resume. It's found in becoming a man who confronts chaos and solves problems. The meaning comes from the work itself—the intrinsic good of bringing order and overcoming challenges, not the narcissistic validation it brings.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 10, 2025
Karen Horney has been my biggest influence in psychology.
She explained why “nice guys” burn out, why some become tyrants, and why others vanish into isolation. All of it comes from the same root. A quick guide 🧵 Image
Horney (1885–1952) was a German psychoanalyst who broke from Freud. Forget Oedipus complexes—she said the real driver of human misery is deeper: Basic Anxiety.
Once you get this, people’s behavior starts making scary sense.
Basic Anxiety = feeling small, alone, and unsafe in a hostile world. Usually formed in childhood when love feels conditional. You can have a PhD, six figures, a family… and still live with it every day.
Read 12 tweets
Aug 6, 2025
I’m old. At my church growing up, youth ministry was sex-segregated and led by the fathers (mostly in suits). Only the youth choir and Sunday School were co-ed. I didn’t see the wisdom in that—until I wrote my book on fatherhood. Here’s why, backed by research: Image
Black boys in America don’t just need mentors.
They thrive socially, economically, spiritually, etc. with deeply invested older Black men—especially fathers—who build trust with their family, speak into their identity, and walk with them as extended family.
A recent study found that Black youth don’t just benefit from one-on-one mentorship.
They thrive when mentors:
• bond with the boy’s family
• operate like extended family
• stay for the long haul
• and model what manhood looks like
Read 14 tweets
Aug 1, 2025
We raised GenZ/GenAlpha boys to be sweet, self-effacing "nice guys" that all the moms like. Now they’re terrified of rejection, addicted to video games, paralyzed by fear--a reaction again the narcissism of millennials. Let me explain how we created a generation of doormats. Image
To fix “toxic masculinity,” we overcorrected.
We taught boys:
– never to take up space
– never to be assertive
– never to want anything strongly
– always to be soft, sensitive, agreeable
Now we have 20-year-olds who won't ask girls out or grow up. Don't blame video games.
What we called “humility” was actually training in self-erasure. What we called “niceness” was often neurotic people-pleasing. We taught boys that being liked by everyone is the highest good. Especially by women and teachers.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(