The hot new trend in GOP circles -- banning books -- is a reminder that reactionaries never give up. They never abandon any tactic or target. Every time the rest of us think "well, that's settled" we're eventually proven wrong. popular.info/p/the-war-on-l…
For instance, outside the swamps, most people think the battle over gay marriage is basically done. The reactionaries have moved on, right? They're off being cruel to trans people now.
My prediction: nope. If reactionaries get enough power, it will come back. They never quit.
When your worldview is based on hierarchy & rigid categories, the very existence of difference feels like a threat, whether it materially intersects with your life or not. They know all those gay people are out marrying one another & on some level it will always chafe.
A lot of people think that the basic structure of the modern US state, as established in the early 20th century, is secure. After all it's been in place almost 100 years! But nope. Reactionaries are *still* working to go back to pre-Lochner days. Always will.
If there's one lesson of recent US politics (well, the entire history of US politics) it's that no advance -- in democracy, decency, tolerance, compassion -- is ever secure. There's no plateau or finish line. Every advance is being actively defended, or actively eroded.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This whole thread is a painful demonstration of how badly some people misunderstand the threat of reactionary backlash (in general, not just in the US). But this point in particular is important & worth dwelling on.
To view "they believed Trump" as exculpatory is to miss how this dynamic -- familiar in every reactionary backlash ever -- works. Of *course* they convinced one another of a lie that would justify their violence. That's the whole game! That's the two-step.
First you tell one another lies -- about the looming threat posed by the immigrants, the professors, the lib elites -- and then you commit violence based on those lies. Then, afterward, if called to account, you use your belief in the lies to justify your violence.
The story of the last 30 years of Dem politics: Dems use austerity policy to respond to Republican "tax & spend" critiques, only to find that a) those policies don't work & b) Republican critiques only escalated. Lose-lose.
Adding: it feels like Dems this round learned their lesson & support a better approach, as evidenced by their passage of the CTC & the subsequent halving of child poverty. They've figured out how to actually slash poverty, cheaply! And now ... Manchin won't let them. 😒
Dems will have accomplished a ton from 20-22, esp. if they can get some form of the BBB across the finish line. The painful part is that they were sooo close, collectively, to really really going for it, FDR-style, & were stopped (or at least impeded) by a tiny handful of jerks.
I never see TV ads except when I'm watching football w/ the 18yo. These car commercials, y'all ... such a sweaty, try-hard, over-compensating masculinity. It inspires intense fremdschämen for the entire country.
Some of these trucks make me lol now -- the grills have gotten so high, the entire thing so hulking, as to be wildly impractical. These things are not for "work." They're designed to be intimidating, to make sad suburban dudes feel tough at the expense of others' safety.
Despite how they might make their owners feel, giant modern trucks are less safe for others on the road *and for their drivers*. They make the roads less safe for everyone. usatoday.com/story/money/ca…
Interesting discussion of the shift from ownership to everything-as-a-service. I used to be very bullish on this trend, but of course like everything else it's evolving into a dystopian corporate shitscheme. gizmodo.com/in-2030-you-wo…
I'll say this: if hardware is simply going to become a temporary delivery vehicle for software services, quickly deprecated, then hardware manufacturers should have strict take-back requirements.
In other words, if Sonos software is going to stop supporting older Sonos speakers, then Sonos should be required by law to accept the return of those speakers, and be responsible for their disposal/recycling.
Wow, the tepid defenses of this show make me even less excited to see it than the scathing review. They sound very, very similar to people's reactions when I pointed out what a monstrous, unholy puddle of shitbarf Episode IV was. "Oh, it was fine." No, it wasn't.
AAAAHHHH I mean Episode IX! Obviously IV is an all-time classic. Worst typo ever.
Good thread, but this is the main & most irritating thing: the pretense among cancel-culture warriors that they are simply applying content-neutral principles ... yet somehow this leads them to devote 98% of their energy to small liberal arts colleges.
Today & throughout history, it is fundamentalists & reactionaries & defenders of existing unequal systems that do the bulk of the censoring, because they don't want reigning dogma challenged. This is Politics 101. History 101. Psychology 101. There is something truly surreal ...
... about the fact that a bunch of people are pretending otherwise. It makes sense though, because what narrative better serves the powers-that-be than the notion that trans people, POC, professors, & students are the real source of suppressive power? Of course they elevate it.