Here's a thing I keep thinking about: I keep getting told things like we can't shame people into getting vaccines, that people need an end to mask requirements and other restrictions as a reward, etc.
But we got whole towns of people to agree that mowing a lawn is necessary?
"Americans just aren't willing to accept sacrifice or inconvenience or discomfort or hard work for the sake of community."
But... lawns. Decades of people tending them. Watering them. Cutting them. Seeding them. Sodding them. Occasionally painting them.
Women started shaving sundry body hair and people of all genders started wearing antiperspirant deodorant because of advertising campaigns.
Alka Seltzer doubled a sale of its same basic product people had been taking 1 of by writing a jingle to tell the same people to take two.
But it couldn't affect property values until after people cared about it? Like, there's not a state of nature in which a lawn not kept to Suburban Americana Standards lowers property values, thereby teaching us the harsh lesson of tending to them?
And I know that part of the puzzle here is that there wasn't a well-funded, well-organized, and utterly ruthless counter-lobby that was willing to go scorched earth in reflexive opposition to any of these campaigns of propaganda and/or social pressure.
Like, I don't believe that Alka-Seltzer's "take two/Plop, plop, fizz, fizz" campaign would work if they did it today and the Tucker Carlsons of the world decided it was worthwhile to pretend that Big Seltzer was a communist front.
But that just makes all the "You have to understand, human nature, we can't shame people into this, they wouldn't trust an informational campaign, you can lead a horse to water," etc., stuff seem insincere and punch-pulling to me.
The problem, in short, isn't human nature. The problem remains Republican obstructionism.
And to be clear, I know that I personally have no power to shame people into getting vaccines. I'm working on convincing the reflexes that connect to my typing fingers of that. I just question the idea that society as a whole has no power to shape behaviors and attitudes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a thing: if you write an essay about your warm and complicated feelings about your husband, and it has a headline, lede, and deck about how awful he is and how much you hate him, AND the essay is behind a paywall?
Most people who see those things won't read the essay.
That "Oh, nobody is reading critically these days, readers are so stupid and gullible." take is missing the point. You can talk about how a savvy consumer should know better than to fall for false advertising, if you want, I guess, but this isn't a question of literacy.
Very possibly not.
And arguably the sardonic, self-deprecating (by way of family-deprecating) approach to the essay's intended point is valid, if a terrible idea given the current state of the art/the industry.
This was a cold-calling sales job, but it wasn't phrased to us or the customers as a sales job. We were the "scheduling" department. The sales reps were in the field. We were supposed to call someone and get whoever answered the phone to say "yes" to a visit from the sales rep.
The company was nominally a home-improvement company. Sold siding and windows and a few other things (gutters, maybe?) so that if we encountered somebody who didn't believe us when we told them they needed X, we would pivot to Y and then Z.
There's more than one cause of this (as there is for everything) but when I hear it phrased like that I can't help but think about how much we have relied on moralization and stigmatization in place of health education, in all aspects of life.
We've got a culture that largely gave up on teaching kids to like vegetables (and teaching parents how to help them do so) in favor of the message "No one likes eating vegetables, but you have to do it, because it's good for you."
Our compulsory physical education involves games but in a "You've got to play this sportsball because today we're playing this sportsball" way, with a lot of bullying and sanctioning of bullying, and adolescent anxiety multipliers built into the system.
So I started playing Control after watching the first of @JuliaLepetit's recent VODs. I'm not super far into it so please no spoilers, but I find that it's a game with a lot to say and I think by the time I'm done I'll have a lot to say about it.
It's fun to watch Julia play it because as a visual artist she keeps stopping to point out things that I would never notice, in particular how the game designers achieve the difficult trick of staging the big areas so that when you enter them you get a striking visual.
Which, you're probably thinking that's not a hard trick, games do it all the time, but I'm not talking about a micro-cutscene with strategic camera focusing and panning. What's trickier is doing it in free-roaming mode with the camera following the player's shoulder.
As somebody who reads a lot of books that aren't written for adults, including books written for a lower grade level than even the first Harry Potter was: they are right and they should say it.
I will also add that a big part of J.K. Rowling's clout lies in mass market appeal. While she wrote from a very narrow perspective, she wrote something that marketers knew how to position to sell to millions.
And a lot of what makes stronger writing stronger is a sharper focus.
And another thing about this kind of comparison is that Rowling's claim to fame is having written 7 books in a single continuing narrative. If R.L. Stine didn't compete at her level, it's unsurprising as he was playing a different game.
Rewatching She-Ra and the Princesses of Power and while remembering how good it was, I had forgotten how good it is.
Can't believe there are people who pretend with a straight face that the previous animated adaptation was better than this.
Yes, they're all different adaptations of the toy line(s), by different creators who each hold separate but overlapping sets of rights. I think it's amazing, like a "my cup runneth over" situation.
I guess to be more precise, Revelation is an adaptation of the previous adaptation (I think of it as "the sequel to an enhanced reimagining") and the He-Man and She-Ra cartoons are fresh adaptations of the toy line concepts.