Fascinating thread with interesting details about a dramatic moment in history, possibly undercut by the preachy justification given in the last sentence of the first tweet.
Here's the thing: it's okay to laugh at the absurdity of death. It's human. It's helpful. It's necessary.
I have said -- and am proud of saying -- that it's only gallows humor if your own neck is on the line, otherwise you're just another heckler in the crowd, and such humiliation is part of a public execution.
But death, so far, that we have been able to tell, comes for us all.
Nobody reading this has to charge up a muddy hill into a munitions-based meatgrinder, but we are all living in an era of mass death and many of us are living under leaders who have made it clear they do expect us to walk into the line of fire for the glory and goals of others.
So we see something profound -- a moment of death, one death among ten thousands, recorded as a perfect three-dimensional snapshot -- coupled with a ludicrous caption describing the subject as "wounded", and something bubbles up, breaks the surface tension, and we laugh. Joke.
It's not an insult to M. Antoine Fauveau, lately a dairyman, the one among tens of thousands. It's not disrespectful to the dead of Waterloo. We aren't questioning his bravery. If we're laughing at somebody, it's the author of a Twitter caption.
I write this thread not to dunk on the professor or direct ire towards him and his thread, which I'm genuinely glad to have read.
My goal is to reassure anyone who read the thread and, feeling something for M. Fauveau, feels bad about having laughed or joked.
If his death brought even a single person in the 21st century even a single moment of relief, that bestows upon it a greater purpose than having been thrown against a cannon in pursuit of another man's doomed dream of empire, once upon a war.
The professor mentioned Monty Python, so I'll close with a quote from one of their songs:
"For life is quite absurd, and death's the final word. You must always face the curtain with a bow."
Or shorter and sweeter, from Ruggero Leoncavallo:
"Ridi, pagliaccio."
(LAUGH, clown!)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a thing: if you write an essay about your warm and complicated feelings about your husband, and it has a headline, lede, and deck about how awful he is and how much you hate him, AND the essay is behind a paywall?
Most people who see those things won't read the essay.
That "Oh, nobody is reading critically these days, readers are so stupid and gullible." take is missing the point. You can talk about how a savvy consumer should know better than to fall for false advertising, if you want, I guess, but this isn't a question of literacy.
Very possibly not.
And arguably the sardonic, self-deprecating (by way of family-deprecating) approach to the essay's intended point is valid, if a terrible idea given the current state of the art/the industry.
This was a cold-calling sales job, but it wasn't phrased to us or the customers as a sales job. We were the "scheduling" department. The sales reps were in the field. We were supposed to call someone and get whoever answered the phone to say "yes" to a visit from the sales rep.
The company was nominally a home-improvement company. Sold siding and windows and a few other things (gutters, maybe?) so that if we encountered somebody who didn't believe us when we told them they needed X, we would pivot to Y and then Z.
There's more than one cause of this (as there is for everything) but when I hear it phrased like that I can't help but think about how much we have relied on moralization and stigmatization in place of health education, in all aspects of life.
We've got a culture that largely gave up on teaching kids to like vegetables (and teaching parents how to help them do so) in favor of the message "No one likes eating vegetables, but you have to do it, because it's good for you."
Our compulsory physical education involves games but in a "You've got to play this sportsball because today we're playing this sportsball" way, with a lot of bullying and sanctioning of bullying, and adolescent anxiety multipliers built into the system.
So I started playing Control after watching the first of @JuliaLepetit's recent VODs. I'm not super far into it so please no spoilers, but I find that it's a game with a lot to say and I think by the time I'm done I'll have a lot to say about it.
It's fun to watch Julia play it because as a visual artist she keeps stopping to point out things that I would never notice, in particular how the game designers achieve the difficult trick of staging the big areas so that when you enter them you get a striking visual.
Which, you're probably thinking that's not a hard trick, games do it all the time, but I'm not talking about a micro-cutscene with strategic camera focusing and panning. What's trickier is doing it in free-roaming mode with the camera following the player's shoulder.
As somebody who reads a lot of books that aren't written for adults, including books written for a lower grade level than even the first Harry Potter was: they are right and they should say it.
I will also add that a big part of J.K. Rowling's clout lies in mass market appeal. While she wrote from a very narrow perspective, she wrote something that marketers knew how to position to sell to millions.
And a lot of what makes stronger writing stronger is a sharper focus.
And another thing about this kind of comparison is that Rowling's claim to fame is having written 7 books in a single continuing narrative. If R.L. Stine didn't compete at her level, it's unsurprising as he was playing a different game.
Rewatching She-Ra and the Princesses of Power and while remembering how good it was, I had forgotten how good it is.
Can't believe there are people who pretend with a straight face that the previous animated adaptation was better than this.
Yes, they're all different adaptations of the toy line(s), by different creators who each hold separate but overlapping sets of rights. I think it's amazing, like a "my cup runneth over" situation.
I guess to be more precise, Revelation is an adaptation of the previous adaptation (I think of it as "the sequel to an enhanced reimagining") and the He-Man and She-Ra cartoons are fresh adaptations of the toy line concepts.