Thread by @babuyagu

Similar to the Pogba situation.... I think sunk cost fallacy comes into play sometimes with players.

Is it better right now to right off Keita and take a huge hit selling him/letting his deal run out?

Or do we invest more into another deal hoping he can now get and stay fit.

https://twitter.com/UncleCastle/status/1479173820749475843

My argument on him would be this - we never get back what we paid.

Also, to get a player of his quality would cost FAR in excess of what we get selling.

So an incentivised contract which various clauses kicking in is he plays x minutes or y goals+assists would be great.

Giving him a 50m starting midfielder contract now is difficult to justify though. And if he is holding out for that then we likely will move him on.

Seems to like it here though and I think he will be open to something that suits both parties.

There is also the problem of transition.

How many players are we already needing to replace in the summer? Milner, Ox, Origi all look like they will be leaving at a minimum. Maybe Taki too. At what point is that just too much upheaval and too many players Klopp has to take his

time win and bed them in slowly?

I can really go either way on this and see pros and cons no matter what we do.

I would be really concerned at the quantity and quality of players needing to arrive in the summer if he is another on the way out.