A large part of the totally-unsubstantiated theory that the FBI actually incited the Jan. 6 riot started with people not understanding how to read charging documents and making assumptions about their misunderstanding. And it's gone downhill from there.
https://twitter.com/ArthurDelaneyHP/status/1479178316414619648
Guys, there were federal agents in the crowd on Jan. 6. We know because one of them, a DEA agent, was prosecuted.
Here he is showing his creds.
He was with his brother, an FBI agent, who was investigated but not charged. He even went on Tucker Carlson's show to talk about it.
Here he is showing his creds.
He was with his brother, an FBI agent, who was investigated but not charged. He even went on Tucker Carlson's show to talk about it.
Here's the story. The DEA learned one of its agents was at the Capitol (with his weapon) because he was group-texting pics to a bunch of other agents. reuters.com/article/us-usa…
The DEA agent, Mark Ibrahim, said he went to the Capitol at the request of a friend, who was asked by the FBI to document the day.
The friend told investigators that wasn't true and that Ibrahim went there to use the rally to launch a "political podcast and cigar brand."
The friend told investigators that wasn't true and that Ibrahim went there to use the rally to launch a "political podcast and cigar brand."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
