I see some on the right criticizing @VP for "comparing" 1/6 to 9/11. First, she wasn't comparing them, she was saying they were notable dates in history. Second, even if she were comparing them, it's a useful comparison. While 9/11 was horrific and should not be minimized...
...the threat posed to the U.S. by Trump, Trumpists and the far right is much greater than that ever posed by Al Qaeda. I've said it before and say it again. thedailybeast.com/the-maga-movem…
Fox didn't much like it when I said it then. So, let me try a different tactic. George W. Bush compared the two when he said, "There Is little cultural overlap between violent extremists abroad and violent extremists at home. But in their disdain for pluralism...
In their disregard for human life, in their determination to defile national symbols, they are children pf the same foul spirit." He's not alone in making the comparison the Trump-y right can't stand.
George Will said last spring that the 1/6 insurrection should be ‘burned into the American mind as firmly as 9/11, because it was that scale of a shock to the system.’”
You know why people on the right and left say this? Because it's true. And that's exactly why what @VP said in her powerful remarks (preceding @POTUS's important address this morning) was the right thing to say...and why it was so galling to Trump apologists.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Powerful remarks from @POTUS & @VP. Credit to the president for the directness with which he characterized the role of his immediate predecessor. But as with Garland yesterday, the enduring measure of their performances shall not be in their words but in their actions.
It is not enough to call for defending voting rights. The speech would have been better had he directly put the weight of his office and his personal reputation behind the fight for the legislation that will soon be before the Senate.
It is not enough to say we are a nation of laws. Rather, we must see the enforcement of those laws. It is not enough to say we will defend democracy. Our leaders must say and demonstrate how they will do it.
Merrick Garland clearly understands and clearly articulated the threats American democracy faces. He framed them in his speech today in the context of the values and ideals we should hope for in our attorney general and Department of Justice.
Though his delivery was dry and revealed him again to be at his very core a jurist, his contempt was clear for those behind the 1/6 attack, behind the escalating threats of violence to American officials at every level, behind attacks on voting rights.
Indeed, his unhappiness with Supreme Court decisions (like Shelby) diluting the Voting Rights Act was palpable. It was also clear he understands the expectations of those who seek punishment not for the mob on 1/6 but for those who instigated, planned & paid for the attack.
Agree with this. Making corporations and billionaires pay taxes should be a central priority of Biden this year. So should standing up to Big Tech (including anti-trust legislation). People believe Biden cares about the average person. They need to know he will fight for them.
If I were making Biden's New Year's resolutions (after a very good first year in office), I would suggest he resolve not just to be strong but to communicate his strength--and note that the best way to communicate strength is to be strong.
Related: Every day this year, Biden needs to send the message that the November elections are not just "the midterms." They represent an existential choice for our democracy pitting Dems vs. a GOP that seeks to gut our system and disenfranchise tens of millions of Americans.
2022 begins with a strong likelihood that democracy in America will be significantly weakened by year's end--through voting restrictions, a right wing dominated Supreme Court that is becoming ever more radicalized and politicized, and likely GOP wins in November.
Should DoJ not hold coup plotters accountable, not act in the few weeks that remain to pursue the Mueller obstruction charges against Trump, that will compound the crisis by increasing Trump's sense of impunity.
Roe will die this year. Common sense gun restrictions will be limited. The ability of the executive branch to manage everything from pandemics to the climate crisis may well be weakened.
I feel your contempt & loathing for Manchin. He's earned it. I've been seething all morning. It's far from the first time he has me feeling this way. But justified as our disgust & anger is, I'm not sure they're constructive. A thread on why hating him is right but not enough...
First, railing at what a heartless, corrupt, hypocritical, jackass Manchin is wont change anything. And if you're angry at him for the right reasons-which is seeking a better life for Americans in need, protecting democracy, etc.-the real issue isn't him. He's not going away.
He's part of a political reality for now in which just one intransigent, ignorant, greedy, yacht-residing, motherfucker of a "Democrat" can ally himself w/50 similarly craven, cold-hearted, power-hungry, one percent-serving, conscienceless Republicans to control our Senate.
Just finished a great special edition of @DeepStateRadio featuring a debate about the whether Big Tech may someday supplant the power of nation states and how. It features @ianbremmer and @stephenWalt.