There is an absolute disaster waiting to happen over the next twenty years. A thread on climate change and conflict.
I say waiting to happen ... I actually mean already happening, and going to get much much worse.
Let's look at the Sahel - it's the most obvious example of this dynamic, but there are others.
By Sahel, I mean all of it - basically the furthest western point to the furthers eastern on the continent of Africa, so from Senegal to Somalia.
This band passes through Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Sudan, Ethiopia, Eritrea to Somalia.
(Yes we can argue about which countries are in or out of the Sahel but this is a good starter for ten)
This is the region of Africa where the desert meets the jungle (via savannah), Islam meets Christianity, and herders meet settled farmers. It is a zone of transition.
And it is an area that has always been poor; and the governments have been pretty rubbish.
By some counts the countries along that band have had an average of 6 or 7 military coups/takeovers EACH since independence in the (roughly) 1960's
And so this hasn't always been the most peaceful place in the world, but it has been relatively stable.
But this has now changed.
Now - EVERY SINGLE one of the Sahel countries - from west to east - is engaged in some sort of conflict. And every single one of them is being exacerbated by desertification, water use, land use, agricultural collapse, flash flooding:
Basically the effects of Climate Change
(Some of these conflicts include: the Sahel conflict involving multiple countries, Boko Haram/ISWAP, Dafur, Sudan, Ethiopian civil war, Ethiopia/Sudan/Egypt Nile Crisis, various Somali conflicts, etc.)
Partly this is because of the aforementioned stuff - being poor with a rubbish government makes it hard to adapt to the tidal wave of changes that climate change brings
But there is another much simpler reason: the Sahel is warming at 1.5-2x the rate of the rest of the planet.
So a two-degree average rise (really this seems to be the best case scenario if we pull lots of rabbits out of lots of hats) means 3-4 degrees in the Sahel.
3-4 degrees is enough to collapse the already-fragile ecosystems.
To take the most extreme example, probably the worst ecological crisis in Africa is Lake Chad:
It has disappeared by over 90% since the 1960s. 30 million people rely on it for water.
And this kind of leads us to a/the conclusion ...
There are millions of people already fleeing these conflicts - 4 million from the Sahel, another 2 million from Lake Chad/Boko Haram, Dafur/Sudan, several million from Somalia. I dunno - let's say 10 million from the region.
What does this look like after twice the amount of warming that we have had now?
We are currently at 1.2 degrees of warming. What does it look like at 2 degrees of warming?
The Sahara is already expanding southwards into this zone by 500m PER YEAR. Does this rate increase?
Will Lake Chad exist in 2040? Where will those 40m go to feed themselves?
I have to say - I don't see the wholescale policy effort required for a crisis of this magnitude.
I mean finally we are slowly getting our act together on net zero, decarbonisation etc.
But Climate Change is already causing/exacerbating conflicts, and this will get much much worse, in just a few short years (say twenty or thirty).
What's the plan?
And as you cast your eye along the Sahel land, you do see lots of western countries involved - either through the UN, or on their own. But they seem to be doing one of two things - fighting Islamists (which seems to me to be like treating the symptoms rather than the causes) ...
... and stopping migrants from getting to Europe. This also seems a bit symptoms focussed if you ask me.
At the moment, the Sahel countries make up about 6% of world pop. By 2050, they will be about 10% of world pop (about 950m).
Where is the grand strategic plan when 10% of the world's population can't live in their own countries?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The new US administration is a revolutionary administration. It seeks to upend the current world order and usher in governments around Europe that are closer to its worldview.
PM Starmer has announced that he would consider sending UK troops to Ukraine as part of the Ukraine peace deal.
I realise that he did this in order to try and galvanise other European countries into action, as well as to try and hold onto whatever ability the UK has to bridge between the US and Europe.
Reflections on Day 1 of the Munich Security Conference
A 🧵
We went into the MSC in the context of the comments this week from the US Secretary of Defence announcing that:
- The US would talk with Russia about ending Ukraine War, without Ukraine
- Ukraine would not end up in NATO
- European troops would have to guarantee the detail without US support.
And most importantly, Pete Hesgeth announced that the US was no longer the primary security guarantor of European security because they were too busy elsewhere (i.e. China).
The US has effectively said that it is scaling back its appetite to be the security guarantor in Europe - a role it has played for the almost exactly 80 years since the end of World War 2.
They also have said that they will be bringing and end to the Ukraine war through direct US-Russian negotiations, and that the US will be uninvolved with any of the security guarantees afterwards - Europe is on its own.
It’s been an exhausting 3 weeks listening to President Trump’s executive orders.
Are there any patterns?
Trump’s thought processes: he is 💯 a New York property developer. You see it in how he throws ideas out to see if they stick (or to watch how people respond them them), so as to guide his next steps.
How did the collapse of British military power lead to the latest Donald Trump outburst on Greenland?
A 🧵 (with some 🖍️)
Trump said yesterday that he wouldn’t rule out military force to bring Greenland under US control. Greenland is the largest island in the world and in a critical strategic position - of which more later
Of course - Greenland isn’t as big as this map suggests - which looks like it does as the map projection enlarges territory closer to the poles. But it is still pretty big, and pretty important.