Mike Martin MP 🔸 Profile picture
Jan 7, 2022 20 tweets 3 min read Read on X
There is an absolute disaster waiting to happen over the next twenty years. A thread on climate change and conflict.
I say waiting to happen ... I actually mean already happening, and going to get much much worse.

Let's look at the Sahel - it's the most obvious example of this dynamic, but there are others.
By Sahel, I mean all of it - basically the furthest western point to the furthers eastern on the continent of Africa, so from Senegal to Somalia.

This band passes through Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Sudan, Ethiopia, Eritrea to Somalia.
(Yes we can argue about which countries are in or out of the Sahel but this is a good starter for ten)
This is the region of Africa where the desert meets the jungle (via savannah), Islam meets Christianity, and herders meet settled farmers. It is a zone of transition.
And it is an area that has always been poor; and the governments have been pretty rubbish.

By some counts the countries along that band have had an average of 6 or 7 military coups/takeovers EACH since independence in the (roughly) 1960's
And so this hasn't always been the most peaceful place in the world, but it has been relatively stable.

But this has now changed.
Now - EVERY SINGLE one of the Sahel countries - from west to east - is engaged in some sort of conflict. And every single one of them is being exacerbated by desertification, water use, land use, agricultural collapse, flash flooding:

Basically the effects of Climate Change
(Some of these conflicts include: the Sahel conflict involving multiple countries, Boko Haram/ISWAP, Dafur, Sudan, Ethiopian civil war, Ethiopia/Sudan/Egypt Nile Crisis, various Somali conflicts, etc.)
Partly this is because of the aforementioned stuff - being poor with a rubbish government makes it hard to adapt to the tidal wave of changes that climate change brings
But there is another much simpler reason: the Sahel is warming at 1.5-2x the rate of the rest of the planet.

So a two-degree average rise (really this seems to be the best case scenario if we pull lots of rabbits out of lots of hats) means 3-4 degrees in the Sahel.
3-4 degrees is enough to collapse the already-fragile ecosystems.

To take the most extreme example, probably the worst ecological crisis in Africa is Lake Chad:

It has disappeared by over 90% since the 1960s. 30 million people rely on it for water.
And this kind of leads us to a/the conclusion ...

There are millions of people already fleeing these conflicts - 4 million from the Sahel, another 2 million from Lake Chad/Boko Haram, Dafur/Sudan, several million from Somalia. I dunno - let's say 10 million from the region.
What does this look like after twice the amount of warming that we have had now?

We are currently at 1.2 degrees of warming. What does it look like at 2 degrees of warming?
The Sahara is already expanding southwards into this zone by 500m PER YEAR. Does this rate increase?

Will Lake Chad exist in 2040? Where will those 40m go to feed themselves?
I have to say - I don't see the wholescale policy effort required for a crisis of this magnitude.

I mean finally we are slowly getting our act together on net zero, decarbonisation etc.
But Climate Change is already causing/exacerbating conflicts, and this will get much much worse, in just a few short years (say twenty or thirty).

What's the plan?
And as you cast your eye along the Sahel land, you do see lots of western countries involved - either through the UN, or on their own. But they seem to be doing one of two things - fighting Islamists (which seems to me to be like treating the symptoms rather than the causes) ...
... and stopping migrants from getting to Europe. This also seems a bit symptoms focussed if you ask me.
At the moment, the Sahel countries make up about 6% of world pop. By 2050, they will be about 10% of world pop (about 950m).

Where is the grand strategic plan when 10% of the world's population can't live in their own countries?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Martin MP 🔸

Mike Martin MP 🔸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThreshedThought

Nov 25
Let’s take a look at the economic side of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

A 🧵
Once wars go beyond a couple of months, they tend to become a battle of the economies—that is, who is will to turn a bigger part of their economy into a machine that produces arms and munitions.
Obviously, if you have two sides that are both willing to turn as much as possible of their economies over to the war, then the side with the bigger economy will tend to win (all other things being equal).
Read 36 tweets
Nov 18
The US has decided to allow Ukraine to use longer-range missiles in Russia.

This brings to a close a pretty feckless period of US policy towards Ukraine.

A 🧵
It’s quite hard to even work out what the White House is trying to do these days, apart from vainly responding to events.

Let’s dig into it.
This permissions - that Ukraine be allowed to use the longer range US supplied ATACAMS missiles (range 300km) inside Russia - is all of a piece with a series of decisions stretching right back to 2014.
Read 29 tweets
Nov 12
Trump and the UK Strategic Defence Review

A 🪡

(Will there be 🖍️s?)
In the aftermath of Trump’s reelection I tweeted that there were a few things that the UK needed to get onto pronto:
The question is: how well will the UK’s Strategic Defence Review (currently underway, due to report in April) tackle these issues?
Read 20 tweets
Oct 29
There is a lot going on in the news at the moment, but there is a story that is consistently being underreported: Russia.

A 🧵

(potentially with 🖍️)
And in the UK - we have to recognise that Russia, and her actions, are the NUMBER ONE strategic threat that we face.
(You wouldn’t know this from the House of Commons where a lot more time is spent debating the Middle East - which - although it is important, is an order of magnitude less important to the UK in strategic terms than the Russia story)
Read 24 tweets
Mar 7
Snuck into the budget is something that you won’t hear on the news … UK Defence Spending was cut.
Image
Image
We have a land war in Europe that is about the eastern boundary of Europe.
And the Conservative government - quite the worst government in living memory - for a bit of electioneering, cuts the defence budget.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31
The US has got a problem in the Middle East

A short thread
At a very basic level, the US has lost momentum. It is responding to events, rather than dictating them.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(