In geopolitics, things don't happen because "it is good if they happen". Things happen if it is the interest of some actor.

For example, while US policy makers might see Africa's prosperity as a "good thing", it is not where US interests lie. It is simply not their business.
US interests in Africa are related to containing China, ensuring that nobody launches a terrorist attack on US interests/citizens from here and securing access to key minerals / airfields /ports.

Will a prosperous Africa help US contain China? Neither here nor there.
Washington knows that trade with China will be a major driver of African prosperity - so African prosperity isn't a priority to them the same way prosperity of Asian tigers was.

What are the geopolitical benefits to the US if Africa's GDP doubles? Not really significant.
Fintech is an area of geopolitical significance to Washington in Africa - for the simple reason they don't want the Chinese to dominate Fintech in Africa;

So a lot of US money is pouring in there, and CIA is working behind the scenes to make things happen.
Is a prosperous Africa in Europe's strategic interests?

Yes and no. Growing per capita income will lead to more migration to Europe (up till $6,000 - 7,000/capita), so European policy makers aren't excited about a prosperous Africa.

Migration and security are top concerns.
Then we consider what happens within Africa. Consider Nigeria, Nigeria's politics of "stomach infrastructure" cannot work with a growing middle class.

So, Nigerian policy makers have like zero motivation to create a prosperous Nigeria. They see no "benefit" in it.
So at the end of the day, you need to understand that nobody really wants to you be prosperous.

The odds are stacked against you.

So if you want to prosper, you must fight for it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Onye Nkuzi

Onye Nkuzi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cchukudebelu

6 Jan
"We see that the crisis of decolonization is not just a matter of the decolonized. During the Cold War, Western countries obsessed about African countries becoming satellites of the Soviet Union. Much more recently, we have seen a replay of this moral panic involving China".
"What this really betrays, though, is a dread of losing the continent as a Western satellite, and no European former colonial power has clung to its neocolonial privileges as tightly as France, which still sees the retention of influence in Africa as key to its grandeur".
Read 4 tweets
5 Jan
The British and French told the Americans there was no way they could rebuild their economies after World War2 without exploiting their colonies.

But Washington insisted they must let go of their colonies; that was the motivation for the Marshall Plan & other initiatives
US also opened its markets to former European colonial powers.

There was no way a small, poor European nation like Netherlands could prosper without colonies, it was all they had done for 300 years prior to the Second World War.
When the US opened it markets to everyone from Germany, to Netherlands, to Japan - these countries had another route to prosperity, which did not involving seizing and exploiting territory overseas.
Read 4 tweets
19 Aug 21
The Obasanjo Administration was not focused on rent seeking, that wasn't the point of its reforms.

The Buhari Regime's "intellectual foundations" are the same minds that gave us "import licenses" in the 1970s.

Rent seeking - and nothing else.
Lagos-based Nigerians in their 20s and 30s by 2015, had it easy. All they knew, throughout their working lives, was a government committed to some degree of "economic freedom".

They (wrongly) assumed that trajectory was sacrosanct. They failed to do due diligence.
They (wrongly) believed that an open GSM licensing process and financial sector reforms, was the natural order in Nigeria.

They didn't know that if Abacha had lived a bit longer, he would have simply handed over GSM licenses to his Lebanese friends.
Read 4 tweets
18 Aug 21
This is Generalissimo Chiang Kai Shek, Americans nicknamed him "Cash My Cheque", due to the Kuomintang's penchant for corruption.

One of the selling points of Mao's Communists was they were not as corrupt as the Kuomintang.
Lee Kwan Yew wrote that he developed zero tolerance for corruption, after seeing how the Kuomintang's reputation for corruption damaged their image among overseas Chinese - and made Communism attractive.

But this never stopped the US from cultivating corrupt patrons.
A similar story was repeated in South Vietnam. The US State Department talks a good game about "democracy, human rights & transparency", but when the chips are down - they will cultivate the most corrupt local patrons.

Has anyone forgotten Fidel and Imelda Marcos?
Read 5 tweets
18 Aug 21
To read certain American geopolitical analysts, is to read fantasy fiction;

They assume that Modern China has learned no lessons from Qing China, the Japanese invasion, the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution - and they are doomed to repeat the same mistakes.
Anyone who claimed that Modern Britain reacts exactly the same way to the outside world as Victorian Britain, would be rightfully, laughed out of the room.

But quite a few US geopolitical analysts insist that Modern China will behave exactly like Qing China.
Then there's always a cliched discussion of China's internal geography - the assumption being that it hasn't changed for thousands of years - even when China now has 146,000 km of rail & 161,000 km of highways - which it didn't have during the Qing Dynasty.
Read 4 tweets
17 Aug 21
The US did not build Germany and Japan's institutions post World War 2. Germany and Japan were already advanced industrial nations, with competent bureaucrats - US helped rebuild infrastructure and helped with reorientation, but the Germans & Japanese did the rebuilding.
Germany and Japan's institutions weren't rebuilt from scratch, both nations understood how to collect taxes, provide social services/education, maintain infrastructure and run an effective bureaucracy - long before World War 2, which was remarkably brief.
This is a lot different from Afghanistan, and much of Africa, where similar institutions never existed, in any meaningful sense - and there is a serious lack of competent bureaucrats.

So the German and Japanese example doesn't apply to much of the developing world.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(