My new oped in the @nytimes: "We must not succumb to despair or indifference. It won’t be easy, but there is a path forward if we begin acting now, together, to shore up our fragile election ecosystem." nytimes.com/2022/01/07/opi…
Let’s begin by reviewing some of the key problems. Those who administer elections have faced threats of violence and harassment. One in four election administrators say that they plan to retire before 2024.
Republican election and elected officials who stood up to Mr. Trump’s attempt to rig the 2020 vote count are being pushed out or challenged for their jobs in primaries by people embracing Mr. Trump’s false claims, like Representative Jody Hice.
If Mr. Hice is Georgia’s Secretary of State in 2024 and declares Mr. Trump the winner of the 2024 election after having embraced the lie that Mr. Trump won Georgia in 2020, which Democrats will accept that result?
Trumpist election administrators and Mr. Trump’s meddling in Republican primaries and gerrymandered Republican legislatures and congressional districts create dangerous electoral conditions.
The federal government so far has taken few steps to increase the odds of free and fair elections in 2024.
Congress has fallen down, too. House and Senate Republicans bear the greatest share of the blame. Some were just fine with Mr. Trump’s authoritarian tendencies. Others abhorred his actions, but have done nothing of substance to counteract these risks.
More surprisingly, Democratic House and Senate leaders have not acted as if the very survival of American democracy is at issue, even though leading global experts on democratic backsliding and transitions into authoritarianism have been sounding the alarm.
Here are the three principles that should guide action supporting democratic institutions and the rule of law going forward:
To begin with, Democrats should not try to go it alone in preserving free and fair elections. Some Democrats are willing to write off the possibility of finding Republican partners.
Flying solo is a big mistake. Democrats cannot stop the subversion of 2024 election results alone. Why believe that any legislation passed only by Democrats in 2022 would stop subversive Republican action in 2024?
A coalition with the minority of Republicans willing to stand up for the rule of law is the best way to try to erect barriers to a stolen election in 2024. Remember it took Republican election officials, elected officials, and judges to stand up against an attempted coup in 2020.
Reaching bipartisan compromise against election subversion will not stop Democrats from fixing voting rights or partisan gerrymanders on their own — the fate of those bills depend not on Republicans but on Democrats convincing Manchin and Sinema to modify the filibuster rules.
Republicans should not try to hold anti-election subversion hostage to Democrats giving up their voting agenda.
Second, because law alone won’t save American democracy, all sectors of society need to be mobilized in support of free and fair elections.
It is not just political parties that matter for assuring free and fair elections. It all of civil society: business groups, civic and professional organizations, labor unions and religious organizations all can help protect fair elections and the rule of law.
Civil society needs to oppose those who run for office or seek appointment to run elections while embracing Trump’s false claims of a stolen election. Loyalty to a person over election integrity should be disqualifying.
Finally, mass, peaceful organizing and protests may be necessary in 2024 and 2025.
What happens if a Democratic presidential candidate wins i Wisconsin in 2024 but the Wisconsin legislature stands ready to send in an alternative slate of electors for Mr. Trump or another Republican based on unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud or other irregularities?
These gerrymandered legislators may not respond to entreaties from Democrats, but they are more likely to respond to widespread public protests made up of people of good faith from across the political spectrum.
The hope of collective action is that there remains enough sanity in the center and commitment to the rule of law to prevent actions that would lead to an actual usurpation of the will of the people.
If the officially announced vote totals do not reflect the results of a fair election process, that should lead to nationwide peaceful protests and even general strikes.
If Republicans have embraced authoritarianism or have refused to confront it, and Democrats in Congress cannot or will not save us, we must save ourselves. <END>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rick Hasen

Rick Hasen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rickhasen

3 Jan
And the way to think about January 6 is not what it meant for then but about the lessons it teaches for election subversion next time, as i lay out in this @harvlrev Forum forthcoming article:

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
@HarvLRev Josh, you should spend time as I have talking to people like @LarryDiamond Steve Levitsky, Gretchen Helmke, who study how democracies become authoritarian countries. The danger signs are all here.
Read 4 tweets
28 Dec 21
I wrote five opeds and commentaries in 2021 about the risk of election subversion and what we need to do to help preserve American democracy from the risk of a stolen presidential election in 2024. It started with this pre-Jan 6 @theatlantic piece: theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
On January 11, I wrote @slate The Only Way to Save American Democracy Now slate.com/news-and-polit…
Then, in the @LATimes I wrote Election Law Can’t Protect American Democracy If Our Representatives are Lawless
latimes.com/opinion/story/…
Read 12 tweets
22 Oct 21
The headline here is John Eastman is backpedaling because he's losing and he was caught in still more lies in the National Review interview.
And Eastman's whole point is preposterous: he put "crazy" wrong theories in a legal memo from him to be distributed to others, without even noting that the arguments are weak or don't represent his own views? No respectable lawyer does that in giving legal advice.
And even now Eastman hedges, saying the issue of the VP's authority to unilaterally reject electoral votes is not "resolved." Absurd and dangerous.
Read 8 tweets
27 Sep 21
The risk of election subversion and a stolen election in 2024 became a national story last week, even though the issue isn't new (I wrote about the danger in @nytimes back in April).nytimes.com/2021/04/23/opi…
Here's why I think it's starting to resonate and where we go from here. /1
First, we had the release of the @costareports @realBobWoodward book peril, with revelations about the Eastman memo that literally directed VP Pence how he could simply steal the election for Trump. /2
This was followed by @CNN obtaining first a two page draft of the Eastman memo, and then Eastman himself (!) giving CNN a six page version that made him look even worse. /3
Read 22 tweets
23 Sep 21
I wrote @slate about how @Fedsoc is trying to play it both ways here. They won't confirm or deny if Eastman remains head of one of their practice groups, even as they continue to list him as a contributor. It's despicable. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Here's the relevant bit on @Fedsoc's relationship with John Eastman.
I've spoken at many @FedSoc events, and I'm listed as a "contributor" on their page. fedsoc.org/contributors/r…. They often bring a liberal onto their panels for a better discussion.But I won't ever speak at another FedSoc event again while Eastman remains a member in good standing.
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep 21
"There are thus dual slates of electors from 7 states."
What dangerous nonsense. Does Eastman really think the six page version helps his case?
Here's a lie from John Eastman in the longer memo, when he urges VP pence to just declare the winner based on a false claim of dual electors:
And here's Eastman admitting in his memo that the Supreme Court was never going to intervene to help Trump in the case---despite demanding that at Jan. 6 rally before the insurrection that injured over 100 law enforcement officers
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(