My discussion with Ban Ki Moon on @MLCleaningUp, covered a lot of ground - lessons from the pandemic, energy access, climate change, human rights, the Olympics - and it contained some real bombshells. IN this thread, just some of the highlights... 1/17 cleaningup.live/p/ep70-eh/
"We are suffering this pandemic because the world's leaders have forgotten past experiences. I sincerely hope that when we get over this pandemic, political leaders remember what we have been suffering, and don’t repeat the same foolish mistakes." 2/17
"I telephoned Tedros at the WHO and said you may not be able to handle this crisis alone. Then President Trump withdrew membership from the WHO rather than supporting it, and that was the beginning of the problems for the international community." 3/17
"Energy access is crucial, especially now when schools are closing. Even before the pandemic, many children had no light to do homework for work. This is exactly what I experienced: we didn't have electricity, I had to study under dim candlelight." 4/17
"One of the most reproduced images [from COP21 in Paris] is everyone holding hands, and everyone was dancing, everybody was excited. That was one of the very few moments when the whole world was united for our planet and for future generations." 5/17
Were you pleased or disappointed by COP26? "Half and half. The UK Government officials led by @AlokSharma_RDG and many foreign ministers invested time and energy... but in the end there were some positive and some disappointing developments." 6/17
"I was happy to see an obvious presence at COP26 of US, including President Biden and Special Envoy John Kerry. While there is clearly political will, it is disappointing that the US did not enter negotiations with financial stamina to back this up." 7/17
It was [also] a positive surprise to see the US and China creating their Glasgow declaration on enhancing climate action in the 2020s, which sets a good example and shows dedication from the two countries towards combating climate action. 8/17
"Without Chinese support and working together between Presidents Obama and Xi, the Paris [Agreement] would not have been possible. At the G20 Summit in Haungzou, September 2016, President Xi Jinping took an initiative [which resulted in ratification]" 9/17
"The Paris climate change became effective on 4 of November 2016, 2016. Suppose it had not happened: 2 months [later] President Trump came into power, and he withdrew from the Paris Climate Change Agreement. I'm still sighing a deep sigh of relief!" 10/17
"The matter of cooperation between China and United States is something which I asked and urged them - to work on these global issues first rather than confronting on political or security issues. I think first should come first." 11/17
"Climate change is approaching much, much faster [than expected]. Therefore, I'm urging political leaders: use your wisdom and think about the future of humanity and our planet earth. Let's work on that first – then let's talk about human rights." 12/17
"Let there be no misunderstanding, I don't want it to be said that I'm not paying attention to human rights. I'm going to the [Beijing Winter Olympics] because I am the chairman of the Ethics Commission of the IOC, I have to be there." 13/17
"Let us work together... that's our moral responsibility. I do not have any political and legal responsibility now, but I'm going to continue until we can declare that we have done something to make this a sustainable world." 14/17
It was an extraordinary conversation, ranging from the world's flawed response to Covid-19, through energy access, why he believes climate action is more urgent than human rights, and the Olympics. You can read the highlights, edited for clarity. 15/17 cleaningup.live/p/ep70-eh/
You can also watch my whole conversation with Ban Ki Moon on YouTube. If you do, please click on the like button and leave a comment - whether you agree that climate action is more urgent than human rights or not. Could there be a bigger question?
16/17
And, of course, you can listen to the conversation on your favourite podcast platform, which is what most of our audience does. Again, please remember to like it and leave a comment or a review. It really helps others find @CleaningUp 17/17 cleaningup.live/ep70-ban-ki-mo…
PS: My conversation with Ban Ki Moon was the 70th episode of @MLCleaningUp. Check out our back catalogue, which features Tony Blair, Tony Abbott, Fatih Birol, Ernie Moniz, Steven Chu, Johan Rockström, Christiana Figueres and many more climate rock stars! cleaningup.live
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you really want to know about blue hydrogen, whether it is inevitably incompatible with net zero or whether it is within the laws of physics and engineering - and the wit of humans - to do it right, here's a new paper, written by 16 researchers. 1/4 chemrxiv.org/engage/api-gat…
It says "our main conclusion is that, if the above requirements [limits on CO2 and methane emissions] are met, blue hydrogen can be close to green hydrogen in terms of impacts on climate change and can thus play an important and complementary role" on the road to net zero. 2/4
In fact, the new paper says almost exactly what I was saying before #bluehydrogengate blew up: "I've got nothing against blue hydrogen, as long as there are no fugitive [methane] emissions and [it has] 100% capture, or high-90s per cent capture.” 3/4 rechargenews.com/energy-transit…
So, my lovelies, I just dropped Version 4 of the Clean Hydrogen Ladder! For anyone new to all this, the ladder is my attempt to put use cases for clean hydrogen into some sort of merit order, because not all use cases are equally likely to succeed. 1/10
By way of background, the ladder is intended to debunk the naive view of clean hydrogen as the Swiss Army Knife of the future net zero economy. Just because you could *technically* do something with clean hydrogen, it doesn't mean you will. Thanks for the image idea, Paul! 2/10
This time round, I have written up the Clean Hydrogen Ladder on LinkedIn, so you can see some of my thinking. In the piece I go through the various types of sector where hydrogen might, or might not, play a role. 3/10 linkedin.com/pulse/clean-hy…
My latest for @BloombergNEF: Climate action - It's The Trade, Stupid. Why free trade and fixing the WTO are more important than carbon border adjustments. about.bnef.com/blog/liebreich…
Although dealing with carbon leakage is certainly an important question, it is not the most important question. What is critical is to unleash trade to play its full role in support of climate action. about.bnef.com/blog/liebreich…
How can trade accelerate the uptake of clean technologies? How can it help poorer countries leapfrog to low-carbon solutions? How can it help decarbonize corporate supply chains? These questions will decide the speed, fairness and success of the global net-zero transition.
OK folks, you want zero-emissions construction, forestry and farming machines? The future may be hydrogen, but not as you know it. I spent yesterday with Lord Bamford and his team at @JCBmachines's secret test quarry near Uttoxeter. This puppy burns hydrogen in a thermal engine!
Engineers at @JCBmachines have developed a range of battery machines, which work great if they are not in constant use and have a grid connection. For off-grid, continuous use they tried fuel cells, but found them complex and expensive. Et voila, they developed a hydrogen engine!
I was well impressed. I'm a mech engineer with a thing for fluid dynamics and thermodynamics. The first ever IC engine ran on hydrogen in 1807, but solving all its problems (hotspots producing NOx, steam removal, reliability, etc) is hard. If @JCBmachines has done it, it's a BFD!
This thread by @herdyshepherd1 has been getting a lot of airplay. I'm not a farmer but I have worked on trade and sustainability for over a decade, and I'm an advisor to the Board of Trade. Although I am a huge fan of James's books, I disagree with him on a number of counts. 1/13
2/13. First, it's easy to rebut some of the claims James makes, or at least show that they are not relevant to the trade deal just struck with Australia. And for the record, I find mulesing a repellent practice that has no place in the 21st century.
3/13. Let me also say that I think James and I would agree 100% on the need not just for there to be a competitive farming sector, but one that can contribute fully to the UK's environmental targets, including net zero emissions by 2050 and still be economically successful.
ICYMI because of the launch of Biden's $2tr Infrastructure Plan, the other big news this week was the JRC report on nuclear power which gave it the green light under Do No Significant Harm, clearing it for inclusion in the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy: ec.europa.eu/info/sites/inf…
It's not that nuclear power is a climate silver bullet, as silly ecomodernist bros endlessly and boringly claim. In fact, the current generation of nuclear plants has been tested pretty much to economic disruption, as I wrote in this piece in July 2019. about.bnef.com/blog/liebreich…
The point is that nuclear power is still the largest single producer of near zero-carbon electricity in the EU, responsible for over 25% of all power. At the very least, prolonging the life of existing, safe nuclear plants must be considered a sustainable activity.