The economy added 6.4 million jobs in 2021, a 4.5 percent increase in jobs. that makes 2021 the seventh fastest year for job creation since the aftermath of World War II.
The unemployment rose very rapidly in March & April 2020 but then it has fallen rapidly ever since. Cumulatively the unemployment rate was 6.5 point-years above it's pre-recession value. That is about typical for postwar recessions and much better than the financial crisis.
The unemployment rate is falling much faster than forecast. Now is well below what the Survey of Professional Forecasters expected in every forecast they have made since the pandemic hit. BUT, labor force participation would likely be worse than what they would have forecasted.
Employment rates are still down relative to pre-pandemic for most age-sex groups. A larger fraction of men than women have stopped working with larger employment declines for the prime-age population than for younger people (whose employment has gone up) or retirement age.
Overall employment is 2.7 million workers short of what CBO forecast prior to the pandemic while jobs (based on surveying employers) are 4.4 million short. This indicates that there is still work to do. FIN.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Overall the jobs report is reassuring. A healthy 142K jobs added, average weekly hours increased, participation stayed the same, and most importantly the unemployment rate fell back to 4.2%.
Pace of job growth (adjusting for benchmark revision) mostly unchanged over last year.
Here's the unemployment rate. It is what most people were watching most closely because of difficulties measuring monthly jobs and knowing what numbers for them are hot or cold. It broke from four increases in a row to tick down as the surge in temporary layoffs receded a little.
Reason to be cautious as the Sahm rule is still triggered. I don't find the mitigating arguments fully persuasive (e.g., the increase is due to labor supply not demand or hiring down not firing up). But more important, may simply be like other recession indicators-very imperfect.
1. Do not tax the normal return to capital, instead tax consumption.
2. IF you're taxing capital gains, better to tax a broader base & lower rate with more neutrality, so tax accruals.
I come back to this below, the Platonic ideal may not be achievable in practice. And the "standard" theory may be wrong because it leaves out important considerations. But still, worth taking seriously.
On the second, the argument is that FOR A GIVEN LEVEL OF CAPITAL TAXATION it is better to have a broader base and a lower rate. A [10%] capital gains tax on accrued gains leads to less distortions than a 23.8% tax on realized gains.
Moreover, the relatively little core inflation we've had in the last three months was more than entirely shelter. If you take shelter out then the annual rates are:
The big news in this morning's job release is the unemployment rate up to 4.3% while job growth slows to 114K, wage growth slows and average weekly hours fall. The only contra-indicator was labor force participation up 0.1pp.
The Sahm recession indicator has triggered. This is a variant of a rule Goldman Sachs economists developed--and was the basis for the fiscal stimulus calls that many of us were making in late 2007 and early 2008 when there was a similar run-up of unemployment.
There are stories now about the unemployment rate increase being inflows of immigrants. And we're not seeing increase in layoffs that are more reassuring than the past. But it is still unnerving to see what has been a reliable signal in the past get triggered.
Here are the full set of numbers I'll be discussing in this thread.
Before I go any further, here is actual inflation (including food and energy). It was basically non-existent in May and June as sharp falls in energy prices nearly offset all the other price increases (food price growth was moderate).